Predicting robotic platform missions using a kernel activation network with an asymmetric kernel

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.340833

Keywords:

functional prediction, factor interaction, asymmetric kernel, neural network, robotic platform

Abstract

This study considers those processes predicting the functional efficiency of robotic platforms that affect the optimization of their mission planning. Given the growing demand for autonomous mobile systems, a critical task is to ensure high efficiency of their dynamics under different loads, terrains, and speeds, which requires reliable tools for decision-making even before physical launch.

To solve the task, a method based on a customized Kernel Activation Network (KAN) was devised and programmatically implemented to predict the functional efficiency of the platform. The results demonstrate a significant increase in accuracy: KAN achieves an MSE of 0.00055727 on synthetic data and 0.00041720 on the experimental sample, while other architectures demonstrate 0.00105989 and higher.

The key innovation of KAN is the use of an asymmetric chi-square kernel in parallel with the Gaussian kernel, as well as the integration of input estimates that take into account the triple interaction of factors. This explains the network's ability to effectively capture complex nonlinear dependences between numerous platform parameters (rolling resistance, aerodynamic drag, climbing force, etc.) and environmental conditions. The use of an asymmetric kernel significantly simplifies the network architecture, allowing for high accuracy at lower computational complexity.

In practice, the results serve as an additional tool for optimizing mission planning of robotic platforms. This makes it possible to optimize equipment selection, construct strategic logistics routes, and increase the safety and reliability of autonomous systems under actual conditions. The achieved Technology Readiness Level is 4

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Laktionov, National University "Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic"

PhD

Department of Automation, Electronics and Telecommunications

Alina Yanko, National University "Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic"

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Computer and Information Technologies and Systems

Bohdan Boriak, National University "Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic"

PhD

Department of Automation, Electronics and Telecommunications

Oleksii Mykhailichenko, National University "Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic"

PhD Student

Department of Automation, Electronics and Telecommunications

References

  1. Yanko, A., Pedchenko, N., Kruk, O. (2024). Enhancing the protection of automated ground robotic platforms in the conditions of radio electronic warfare. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 6, 136–142. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2024-6/136
  2. Papadopoulos, C., Mitridis, D., Yakinthos, K. (2022). Conceptual Design of a Novel Unmanned Ground Effect Vehicle (UGEV) and Flow Control Integration Study. Drones, 6 (1), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones6010025
  3. Yanko, A., Krasnobayev, V., Martynenko, A. (2023). Influence of the number system in residual classes on the fault tolerance of the computer system. Radioelectronic and Computer Systems, 3, 159–172. https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2023.3.13
  4. Krasnobayev, V., Yanko, A., Kovalchuk, D. (2023). Control, Diagnostics and Error Correction in the Modular Number System. Computer Modeling and Intelligent Systems, 3392, 199–213. https://doi.org/10.32782/cmis/3392-17
  5. Trujillo, J.-C., Munguia, R., Grau, A. (2021). Aerial Cooperative SLAM for Ground Mobile Robot Path Planning. The 8th International Symposium on Sensor Science, 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/i3s2021dresden-10164
  6. Asiminari, G., Moysiadis, V., Kateris, D., Busato, P., Wu, C., Achillas, C. et al. (2024). Integrated Route-Planning System for Agricultural Robots. AgriEngineering, 6 (1), 657–677. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering6010039
  7. Yu, S., Hirche, M., Huang, Y., Chen, H., Allgöwer, F. (2021). Model predictive control for autonomous ground vehicles: a review. Autonomous Intelligent Systems, 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43684-021-00005-z
  8. Macaulay, M. O., Shafiee, M. (2022). Machine learning techniques for robotic and autonomous inspection of mechanical systems and civil infrastructure. Autonomous Intelligent Systems, 2 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43684-022-00025-3
  9. Rybczak, M., Popowniak, N., Lazarowska, A. (2024). A Survey of Machine Learning Approaches for Mobile Robot Control. Robotics, 13 (1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics13010012
  10. Golub, V., Bisyk, S., Golub, G., Tsyvenkova, N., Sedov, S., Nadykto, V. et al. (2025). Devising a method for categorizing combat wheeled vehicles using fuzzy cluster analysis. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (1 (134)), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.324546
  11. Laktionov, O., Yanko, A., Pedchenko, N. (2024). Identification of air targets using a hybrid clustering algorithm. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (4 (131)), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.314289
  12. Barus, E. S., Zarlis, M., Nasution, Z., Sutarman, S. (2025). Development of machine learning for forecasting optimization implemented in morphology plant growth. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (2 (135)), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.331745
  13. Harumy, H. F., Ginting, D. S., Manik, F. Y., Yel, M. B. (2025). Dominant disaster detection and prediction in coastal areas using neural network system to optimize disaster management in coastal areas. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (2 (134)), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.321966
  14. Laktionov, A. (2021). Improving the methods for determining the index of quality of subsystem element interaction. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (3 (114)), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.244929
  15. Bai, Y. (2022). RELU-Function and Derived Function Review. SHS Web of Conferences, 144, 02006. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214402006
  16. Bolohin, A., Bolohina, Y., Tymchuk, Y. (2025). Ranking of the technical condition of aircraft according to the diagnostic data of the glider design. System Research and Information Technologies, 2, 98–105. https://doi.org/10.20535/srit.2308-8893.2025.2.06
  17. Hryshchuk, O., Zagorodnyuk, S. (2025). Managing energy consumption in FPGA-based edge computing systems with soft-core CPUs. Journal of Edge Computing, 4 (1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.55056/jec.717
  18. Kumar Malik, M., Joshi, H., Swaroop, A. (2025). An Effective Hybrid HBA-MAO for Task Scheduling with a Hybrid Fault-Tolerant Approach in Cloud Environment. International Journal of Image, Graphics and Signal Processing, 17 (4), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijigsp.2025.04.05
  19. Sveshnikov, S., Bocharnikov, V., Mudrak, Y. (2024). Evaluation and choice of an anti-aircraft missile system under uncertain conditions based on fuzzy-integral calculus and hierarchical cluster analysis. Operations Research and Decisions, 34 (2). https://doi.org/10.37190/ord240209
  20. Lutsyk, Y., Parkhomenko, P., Demeniev, O., Alimov, D. (2023). Analysis of the defense planning system based on the capabilities taking into account the leading experience of NATO member states. Modern Economics, 41, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.31521/modecon.v41(2023)-11
  21. Manziuk, E. (2022). Intelligent information technology for obtaining trust decisions based on the ontology of trust in a human-centered approach. Computer Systems and Information Technologies, 1, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.31891/csit-2022-1-11
  22. Volkov, V., Taran, I., Volkova, T., Pavlenko, O., Berezhnaja, N. (2020). Determining the efficient management system for a specialized transport enterprise. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 4, 185–191. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-4/185
  23. Bazarnyi, S., Husak, Y., Voitko, T., Aliew, F., Yevseiev, S. (2025). Mathematical model of multi-domain interaction based on game theory. Advanced Information Systems, 9 (3), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2025.3.03
  24. Ponochovniy, Y., Bulba, E., Yanko, A., Hozbenko, E. (2018). Influence of diagnostics errors on safety: Indicators and requirements. 2018 IEEE 9th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1109/dessert.2018.8409098
  25. Yanko, A., Hlushko, A., Onyshchenko, S., Maslii, O. (2023). Economic cybersecurity of business in Ukraine: strategic directions and implementation mechanism. Economic and Cyber Security, 30–58. https://doi.org/10.15587/978-617-7319-98-5.ch2
  26. Jarema, R. (2018). 10 Steps to Choosing the Right Motors for Your Robotic Project. Husarion Blog, Medium. Available at: https://medium.com/husarion-blog/10-steps-to-choosing-the-right-motors-for-your-robotic-project-bf5c4b997407
  27. Larminie, J., Lowry, J. (2012). Electric Vehicle Technology Explained. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118361146
  28. MinMaxScaler. Scikit-learn developers. Available at: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.MinMaxScaler.html
  29. StandardScaler. Scikit-learn developers. Available at: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.preprocessing.StandardScaler.html
  30. Berrar, D. (2019). Cross-Validation. Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, 542–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-809633-8.20349-x
  31. BRouter-Web. BRouter. Available at: https://brouter.de/brouter-web
  32. torch. PyPI. Available at: https://pypi.org/project/torch/
  33. Netron. Netron developers. Available at: https://netron.app/
  34. Onyshchenko, S., Zhyvylo, Y., Hlushko, A., Bilko, S. (2024). Cyber risk management technology to strengthen the information security of the national economy. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 5, 136–142. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2024-5/136
Predicting robotic platform missions using a kernel activation network with an asymmetric kernel

Downloads

Published

2025-09-25

How to Cite

Laktionov, O., Yanko, A., Boriak, B., & Mykhailichenko, O. (2025). Predicting robotic platform missions using a kernel activation network with an asymmetric kernel. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(9 (137), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.340833

Issue

Section

Information and controlling system