Cleaning-in-place station decomposition for object-oriented control

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.343204

Keywords:

Abstract

This study considers a CIP station used for automated cleaning of process equipment in the food industry. The task addressed relates to the lack of a formalized methodology for decomposing a CIP station that would enable the construction of object-oriented control models in accordance with international standards.

The result of this study is the devised methodology for CIP station decomposition based on the principles of IEC 61512, which includes the identification of the levels of process cell, process units, equipment modules, as well as control modules. It has been shown that this approach allows for a structured representation of the equipment and its functions, enabling the integration of technological steps with the equipment of the CIP station.

The results are attributed to the fact that the CIP cleaning process has a hierarchical structure and procedural repeatability, which allows it to be formalized as a set of interrelated levels – from the process cell to individual equipment modules. This feature ensures consistency between the process logic and the physical structure of the equipment, which enhances the efficiency of control. A distinctive feature of the results is the combination of hardware hierarchy with information models, which differentiates the proposed solution from conventional descriptive approaches. This not only improves the flexibility and scalability of control systems but also creates conditions for building libraries of reusable software objects.

The results could be practically implemented at industrial enterprises in the food, pharmaceutical, and chemical industries where CIP stations are used. They could be integrated into current SCADA/PLC systems using AutomationML and OPC UA standards, ensuring compatibility with MES/ERP levels of control. This improves the efficiency of equipment operation while reducing the costs for designing and maintaining automation systems

Author Biographies

Volodymyr Polupan, National University of Food Technologies

PhD

Department of Automation and Computer Technologies of Control Systems named after Prof. A. P. Ladanyuk

Oleksandr Pupena, National University of Food Technologies

PhD

Department of Automation and Computer Technologies of Control Systems named after Prof. A. P. Ladanyuk

Roman Mirkevych, National University of Food Technologies

PhD

Department of Automation and Computer Technologies of Control Systems named after Prof. A. P. Ladanyuk

Oleh Klymenko, National University of Food Technologies

PhD

Department of Automation and Computer Technologies of Control Systems named after Prof. A. P. Ladanyuk

Oleksii Mirkevych, National University of Food Technologies

PhD Student

Department of Automation and Computer Technologies of Control Systems named after Prof. A. P. Ladanyuk

References

  1. Memisi, N., Moracanin, S. V., Milijasevic, M., Babic, J., Djukic, D. (2015). CIP Cleaning Processes in the Dairy Industry. Procedia Food Science, 5, 184–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2015.09.052
  2. Jin, G., Jiang, Z., Sun, Y., Liu, Z., Liu, S., Wu, F. (2025). Intelligent clean-in-place (CIP) system in beverage (healthy water) cleaner production. Food Control, 168, 110877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2024.110877
  3. Belei, O., Shtaier, L., Stasіuk, R., Mirzojeva, A. (2023). Design of the human-machine interface for the cleaning-in-place system in the dairy industry. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (2 (123)), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.282695
  4. Obermeier, M., Braun, S., Vogel-Heuser, B. (2015). A Model-Driven Approach on Object-Oriented PLC Programming for Manufacturing Systems with Regard to Usability. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 11 (3), 790–800. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2014.2346133
  5. Pupena, О., Elperin, I., Mirkevych, R. (2017). Modern standards of integrated management and ways of their implementation in Ukraine. Scientific Works of NUFT, 23 (1), 25–41. Available at: https://elibrary.nuft.edu.ua/library/DocDescription?doc_id=355445
  6. Рupena, A., Elperin, I., Mirkevich, R., Klymenko, O. (2017). Computer integrated manufacturing: overview of modern standards. Automation of Technological and Business Processes, 8 (3), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.15673/atbp.v8i3.571
  7. Stenger, F., Schmalz, D., Bieringer, T., Brodhagen, A., Dreiser, C., Schweiger, A. (2016). Flexible Chemical Production by Modularization and Standardization: Status Quo and Future Trends. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 88 (9), 1217–1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201650240
  8. Parant, A., Gellot, F., Zander, D., Carré-Ménétrier, V., Philippot, A. (2023). Model-based engineering for designing cyber-physical systems from product specifications. Computers in Industry, 145, 103808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103808
  9. Busboom, A. (2024). Automated generation of OPC UA information models – A review and outlook. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 39, 100602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2024.100602
  10. Henßen, R., Schleipen, M. (2014). Interoperability between OPC UA and AutomationML. Procedia CIRP, 25, 297–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.10.042
  11. IEC 61512-1: BATCH Control Part 1: Models and Terminology (2013). International Electrotechnical Commission. Available at: https://interoperable-europe.ec.europa.eu/collection/ict-standards-procurement/solution/iec-61512-11997-batch-control-part-1-models-and-terminology/distribution/iec-61512-11997-batch-control-part-1-models-and-terminology
  12. Méndez, C. A., Cerdá, J., Grossmann, I. E., Harjunkoski, I., Fahl, M. (2006). State-of-the-art review of optimization methods for short-term scheduling of batch processes. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 30 (6-7), 913–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2006.02.008
  13. Alvarado, J., Vegetti, M., Gonnet, S. (2025). Asset Administration Shell Submodel for Representing the Procedural Part of ISA-88 Recipes. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 23 (1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/tla.2025.10810401
  14. Garcia, A., Oregui, X., Arrieta, U., Valverde, I. (2022). Methodology and Tools to Integrate Industry 4.0 CPS into Process Design and Management: ISA-88 Use Case. Information, 13 (5), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13050226
  15. Munoz, E., Capon-Garcia, E., Puigjaner, L. (2017). ANSI/ISA 88-95 Standards Based-Approach for Improved Integration of Recipes and Operational Tasks Supported by Knowledge Management. 27th European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering, 2335–2340. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-63965-3.50391-3
  16. Unver, H. O. (2012). An ISA-95-based manufacturing intelligence system in support of lean initiatives. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 65 (5-8), 853–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4223-z
  17. De Minicis, M., Giordano, F., Poli, F., Schiraldi, M. M. (2014). Recipe Development Process Re-Design with ANSI/ISA-88 Batch Control Standard in the Pharmaceutical Industry. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 6. https://doi.org/10.5772/59025
Cleaning-in-place station decomposition for object-oriented control

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Polupan, V., Pupena, O., Mirkevych, R., Klymenko, O., & Mirkevych, O. (2025). Cleaning-in-place station decomposition for object-oriented control. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(3 (138), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.343204

Issue

Section

Control processes