Determining the fire extinguishing efficiency of compressed air foam with modified additive NH4H2PO4

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.345244

Keywords:

compressed air foam, modified additives, fire-extinguishing properties, class A fires, water

Abstract

This study examines the fire extinguishing efficiency of aqueous fire extinguishing agents such as compressed air foam with a modified NH4H2PO4 additive, compressed air foam of standard composition, water, and gel-forming composition.

The principal hypothesis assumes that compressed air foam with a modified NH4H2PO4 additive has more effective fire extinguishing properties when extinguishing class A fires in comparison with compressed air foam of standard composition, water, and gel-forming compositions.

The task addressed was predetermined by the lack of scientifically substantiated comparative data on the fire extinguishing efficiency of aqueous fire extinguishing agents when extinguishing standardized model fires of class 1A: compressed air foam with a modified NH4H2PO4 additive, compressed air foam of standard composition, water, and gel-forming composition.

When using all of the above fire extinguishing agents, successful elimination of combustion was observed. However, the lowest time and mass spent on extinguishing were established precisely for CAF with MA NH4H2PO4. The mass spent on extinguishing the fire by the CAF with NH4H2PO4 is 7% less than the mass of the CAF of standard composition and 52% less than the mass of water. For compressed air foam with MA NH4H2PO4, the extinguishing time was recorded to be 10% less than the time required to extinguish the fire by the CAF of standard composition and 51% less than the time of extinguishing with water.

The extinguishing efficiency indicators of the CAF with MA NH4H2PO4, CAF of standard composition, GFC, and water were compared with each other. As a result, the indicator for CAF with MA NH4H2PO4 is Іе.e = 16.5 m2/kg∙s; for CAF of standard composition, Іе.e = 14.03 m2/kg∙s; for GFC, Іе.e = 11.9 m2/kg∙s; for water, Іе.e = 3.94 m2/kg∙s.

The results emphasize that the use of MA in the composition of CAF, in particular NH4H2PO4, increases its fire-extinguishing properties when extinguishing class A fires. It has been proven that the fire-extinguishing efficiency of CAF with MA content is 15% higher compared to CAF of standard composition. Compared to GFC, the efficiency is 28% higher; compared to water, 77% higher.

Author Biographies

Stanislav Shakhov, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Associate Professor

Department of Engineering and Rescue Machinery

Stanislav Vynohradov, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Engineering and Rescue Machinery

Dmytry Hryschenko, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

Department of Engineering and Rescue Machinery

Andrii Melnychenko, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), Associate Professor

Department of Organization and Conduct of Emergency Rescue Operations

Evgen Grinchenko, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs

PhD, Associate Professor

Research Laboratory on the Problems of Information Technologies and Combating Crime in Cyberspace

Liudmyla Knaub, Military Academy (Odesa)

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Engineering Mechanics

Nataliia Maslich, Military Academy (Odesa)

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Engineering Mechanics

Tetiana Mohylianets, Military Academy (Odesa)

PhD

Department of Engineering Mechanics

Volodymyr Pinder, Lviv State University of Life Safety

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Vehicle Operation and Fire-Rescue Techniques

Yuriy Pavlyuk, Lviv State University of Life Safety

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Operation of Vehicles and Fire and Rescue Equipment

References

  1. Dubinin, D., Korytchenko, K., Lisnyak, A., Hrytsyna, I., Trigub, V. (2018). Improving the installation for fire extinguishing with finely­dispersed water. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (10 (92)), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.127865
  2. Ostapov, K., Kirichenko, I., Senchykhin, Y., Syrovyi, V., Vorontsova, D., Belikov, A. et al. (2019). Improvement of the installation with an extended barrel of cranked type used for fire extinguishing by gel-forming compositions. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (10 (100)), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.174592
  3. Shakhov, S., Vinogradov, S., Grishenko, D. (2023). Analysis of ways to increase the efficiency of compressed air foam for extinguishing solid materials. Municipal Economy of Cities, 1 (175), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.33042/2522-1809-2023-1-175-151-159
  4. Shakhov, S., Vinogradov, S., Gruschenko, D. (2023). Analysis of the experience of using modifiing additives and their physico-chemical properties for further application in the composition of compressed air foam. Fire Safety, 42, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.32447/20786662.42.2023.10
  5. Shakhov, S., Vynohradov, S., Kodryk, A., Titenko, O., Melnychenko, A., Hryschenko, D. et al. (2024). Influence of modified additives on the properties of compressed air foam. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (6 (130)), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.310371
  6. Shakhov, S., Vynohradov, S., Hryschenko, D., Savchenko, A., Grinchenko, E., Knaub, L. et al. (2025). Determining the effect of modified additives on the fire-extinguishing properties of compressed air foam. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (10 (134)), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.325930
  7. Rappsilber, T., Krüger, S. (2018). Design fires with mixed-material burning cribs to determine the extinguishing effects of compressed air foams. Fire Safety Journal, 98, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2018.03.004
  8. Rappsilber, T., Below, P., Krüger, S. (2019). Wood crib fire tests to evaluate the influence of extinguishing media and jet type on extinguishing performance at close range. Fire Safety Journal, 106, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.04.014
  9. Shakhov, S., Vinogradov, S. (2020). Fire extinguishing efficiency of compressed air foam, water and gel forming agents in a standard class A test fire. Safety & Fire Technology, 55 (1), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.12845/sft.55.1.2020.10
  10. Huang, C., Dai, Z., Jiang, Z., Chen, Y., Zhong, M. (2024). Wood stack fire tests to evaluate the influence of extinguishing medium and driving pressure on fire extinguishing efficacy of forest trees. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 49, 102464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102464
  11. Wu, C., Jing, L., Pan, Y., Zhao, J. (2025). Development and Experimental Evaluation of a Tree Model Test System for Fire Extinguishing Agents. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 3121 (1), 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3121/1/012042
  12. Kim, T.-S., Park, T.-H., Park, J.-H., Yang, J.-H., Han, D.-H., Lee, B.-C., Kwon, J.-S. (2024). Thermal characteristics of fire extinguishing agents in compartment fire suppression. Science Progress, 107 (3). https://doi.org/10.1177/00368504241263435
  13. Park, T.-H., Kim, T.-S., Park, J.-H., Yang, J.-H., Lee, B.-C., Kim, T.-D. et al. (2023). Experiments on the Application of Class A and B Fires to Derive the Optimum Air Ratio of Compressed Air Foam Systems. Fire Science and Engineering, 37 (4), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.7731/kifse.95785771
  14. Yang, J.-H., Kim, T.-S., Park, T.-H., Kwon, J.-S. (2025). Effectiveness of Surface Pre-Application of Compressed Air Foam in Delaying Combustion Spread to Adjacent Buildings. Fire, 8 (9), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire8090359
  15. Weinschenk, C. G., Madrzykowski, D. M., Stakes, K., Willi, J. M. (2017). Examination of Compressed Air Foam (CAF) for interior fire fighting. National Institute of Standards and Technology. https://doi.org/10.6028/nist.tn.1927
  16. Thomitzek, A., Ondruch, J., Chudová, D., Kučera, P. (2015). Effects Of Compressed Air Foam Application On Heat Conditions In Fire Within A Closed Space. TRANSACTIONS of the VŠB – Technical University of Ostrava, Safety Engineering Series, 10 (2), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/tvsbses-2015-0009
  17. Savchenko, О. V., Kireev, О. О., Ostroverx, O. O. (2011). Determination of Fire-fighting ability is optimized nogo-quantitative composition of the gel-forming system CaCl2 – Na2O·2,95 SiO2 – Н2О on the standard model fire. Problemy pozharnoy bezopasnosti, 29, 149–155. Available at: http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/3316
Determining the fire extinguishing efficiency of compressed air foam with modified additive NH4H2PO4

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Shakhov, S., Vynohradov, S., Hryschenko, D., Melnychenko, A., Grinchenko, E., Knaub, L., Maslich, N., Mohylianets, T., Pinder, V., & Pavlyuk, Y. (2025). Determining the fire extinguishing efficiency of compressed air foam with modified additive NH4H2PO4. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(10 (138), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.345244