Fuzzy optimization of heterogeneous smart city server networks under uncertainty in mountainous terrain

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2026.360833

Keywords:

fuzzy inference systems, heterogeneous networks, resource allocation, energy resource optimization, fault tolerance, computing network in a smart city

Abstract

The object of this study is a heterogeneous smart city server network consisting of distributed computing nodes and based on processing data streams from multiple sources. This article examines the efficiency, reliability, and adaptability of a heterogeneous smart city server network under conditions of uncertainty, dynamic load, and information insecurity. A comparative analysis of modern methods for managing information resources in heterogeneous server networks applied to smart city infrastructure is provided.

The advantages and feasibility of using a fuzzy optimization method to improve the efficiency of a heterogeneous smart city server network are substantiated. Based on measurement data from vision, transport, and energy supply sensors, a network architecture for the server infrastructure of the Shusha smart city system, located in the Karabakh region of Azerbaijan, is proposed.

To solve this problem, the advantages of a fuzzy optimization model are substantiated, and it is found that this model can improve the performance of the Shusha smart city heterogeneous server network under uncertainty. To address this problem, a new method for stage-by-stage fuzzy modeling of energy loads arising from influencing meteorological parameters and potential failures was proposed. Unlike traditional deterministic and stochastic optimization methods, the applied fuzzy optimization method allowed for a more detailed study of external factors in the Shusha smart city system, uncertainty regarding the grid power supply, operational reliability, and the criticality of network performance parameters. The results obtained during the study show that processing time is reduced by up to 30%, and fault tolerance of the entire system is increased. This method ensures efficiency and practical application for the development and operation of a heterogeneous server in the Shusha smart city system

Author Biographies

Javanshir Mammadov, Sumgait State University

Doctor of Technical Sciences

Department of Automation and Mechanic

Esmira Mehbaliyeva, Sumgait State University

PhD

Department of Mathematic and Informatics

References

  1. Harchol-Balter, M. (2013). Performance Modeling and Design of Computer Systems. Cambridge University Press, 541. Available at: https://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/27503/frontmatter/9781107027503_frontmatter.pdf
  2. Goren, G., Vargaftik, S., Moses, Y. (2021). Stochastic Coordination in Heterogeneous Load Balancing Systems. Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1145/3465084.3467923
  3. Zhang, C., Patras, P., Haddadi, H. (2019). Deep Learning in Mobile and Wireless Networking: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 21 (3), 2224–2287. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2019.2904897
  4. Zadeh, L. A. (2015). Fuzzy logic – a personal perspective. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 281, 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2015.05.009
  5. Bibri, S. E., Krogstie, J. (2017). Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016
  6. Ebadifard, F., Babamir, S. M. (2018). APSO‐based task scheduling algorithm improved using a load‐balancing technique for the cloud computing environment. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 30 (12). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.4368
  7. Cai, T., Liu, M., Xia, Y. (2021). Individual Data Protected Integrative Regression Analysis of High-Dimensional Heterogeneous Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 117 (540), 2105–2119. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2021.1904958
  8. Mellal, M. A., Al-Dahidi, S., Williams, E. J. (2020). System reliability optimization with heterogeneous components using hosted cuckoo optimization algorithm. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 203, 107110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107110
  9. Martinez, L., Herrera, F. (2000). A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 8 (6), 746–752. https://doi.org/10.1109/91.890332
  10. Mutua, P. W., Mbuthia, M. (2020). Intelligent Multi-coloured Lighting System Design with Fuzzy Logic Controller. APTIKOM Journal on Computer Science and Information Technologies, 1 (3), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.34306/csit.v1i3.58
  11. Wu, H., Xu, Z. (2020). Fuzzy Logic in Decision Support: Methods, Applications and Future Trends. International Journal Of Computers Communications & Control, 16 (1). https://doi.org/10.15837/ijccc.2021.1.4044
  12. Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G. (2010). The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54 (15), 2787–2805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010
  13. Ross, T. J. (2010). Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications. John Wiley & Sons. Available at: https://pzs.dstu.dp.ua/logic/bibl/engineering.pdf
  14. Gou, Y., Zhang, T., Yang, T., Liu, J., Song, S., Cui, J.-H. (2023). A Deep MARL-Based Power-Management Strategy for Improving the Fair Reuse of UWSNs. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 10 (7), 6507–6522. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2022.3226953
  15. Tan, W. W., Chua, T. W. (2007). Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic Systems: Introduction and New Directions (Mendel, J.M.; 2001) [book review]. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 2 (1), 72–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/mci.2007.357196
  16. Su, Y., Liwang, M., Gao, Z., Huang, L., Du, X., Guizani, M. (2021). Optimal Cooperative Relaying and Power Control for IoUT Networks With Reinforcement Learning. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8 (2), 791–801. https://doi.org/10.1109/jiot.2020.3008178
  17. Lim, C., Cho, G.-H., Kim, J. (2021). Understanding the linkages of smart-city technologies and applications: Key lessons from a text mining approach and a call for future research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120893
  18. Alam, T. (2021). Cloud-Based IoT Applications and Their Roles in Smart Cities. Smart Cities, 4 (3), 1196–1219. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities4030064
  19. Islam, K. Y., Ahmad, I., Habibi, D., Jin, J., Waqas, M. (2022). Lifetime Maximization in Underwater Wireless Communication Networks. IEEE Sensors Journal, 22 (15), 15549–15560. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2022.3186032
  20. Gubbi, J., Buyya, R., Marusic, S., Palaniswami, M. (2013). Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29 (7), 1645–1660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2013.01.010
  21. Garg, S. K., Versteeg, S., Buyya, R. (2013). A framework for ranking of cloud computing services. Future Generation Computer Systems, 29 (4), 1012–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2012.06.006
  22. Alhashimi, H. F., Hindia, M. N., Dimyati, K., Hanafi, E. B., Alden, F. Z., Qamar, F., Nguyen, Q. N. (2025). Survey on AI-Enabled Resource Management for 6G Heterogeneous Networks: Recent Research, Challenges, and Future Trends. Computers, Materials & Continua, 83 (3), 3585–3622. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.062867
  23. Gupta, P., Ding, B., Guan, C., Ding, D. (2024). Generative AI: A systematic review using topic modelling techniques. Data and Information Management, 8 (2), 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dim.2024.100066
  24. Ahmed, M., Naser Mahmood, A., Hu, J. (2016). A survey of network anomaly detection techniques. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 60, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2015.11.016
  25. Soft Computing and Optimization (2022). Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6406-0
  26. Mao, Y., You, C., Zhang, J., Huang, K., Letaief, K. B. (2017). A Survey on Mobile Edge Computing: The Communication Perspective. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19 (4), 2322–2358. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2017.2745201
  27. Sun, G., Guan, X., Yi, X., Zhou, Z. (2018). An innovative TOPSIS approach based on hesitant fuzzy correlation coefficient and its applications. Applied Soft Computing, 68, 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.004
  28. Cuervo, E., Balasubramanian, A., Cho, D.-k., Wolman, A., Saroiu, S., Chandra, R., Bahl, P. (2010). MAUI. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1145/1814433.1814441
  29. Karimzadeh-Farshbafan, M., Shah-Mansouri, V., Niyato, D. (2020). Reliability Aware Service Placement Using a Viterbi-Based Algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, 17 (1), 622–636. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsm.2019.2959818
  30. Ullah, I., Arishi, A., Singh, S. K., Alharbi, F., Ibrahim, A. H., Islam, M. et al. (2025). Autonomous network management for 6G communication: A comprehensive survey. Digital Communications and Networks, 11 (6), 1917–1940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcan.2025.07.001
Fuzzy optimization of heterogeneous smart city server networks under uncertainty in mountainous terrain

Downloads

Published

2026-06-26

How to Cite

Mammadov, J., & Mehbaliyeva, E. (2026). Fuzzy optimization of heterogeneous smart city server networks under uncertainty in mountainous terrain. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(4 (141), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2026.360833

Issue

Section

Mathematics and Cybernetics - applied aspects