Analysis of admissibility of central tendency measures to estimate aviation operator progress

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.37795

Keywords:

flight safety, aviation operators, training models, operator's permanent personal characteristics

Abstract

Human role in ensuring flight safety in the system " flight crew – aircraft – medium – air traffic service unit" is considered. The possibility of the training process modeling using stochastic models is shown. The components of the stationary stochastic model of the aviation operator training process were determined. Eleven central tendency measures: arithmetic mean, geometric mean, harmonic mean, three previous measures using weight coefficients, median, mode, Tukey's test, trimmed mean, Winsorized mean and implementation of so-called "bottleneck planning" as potential indicators of aviation operator's permanent personal characteristics were examined.

For each of the potential indicators of permanent personal characteristics, their mathematical properties were analyzed and compared with the requirements arising from the application features. The necessity to synthesize a single parameter, which will be based on the requirements of the real process was substantiated.

Author Biography

Сергій Павлович Борсук, National aviation university Prosp. Kosmonavta Komarova 1, Kiev, Ukraine, 03058

Associate professor, Candidate of technical science

Institute of distant and ultramural education

References

  1. Strelkov, Y. К. (2001). Injenernaya I professiobalnaya psihologiya. Moscow: Vyshshaya shkola, 360.
  2. ICAO. (2001). Rukovodstvo po upravleniyu bezopasnostyu polyotov (RUBP): Doc. ICAO 9859 – AN / 474. Kanada, 300.
  3. Zade, L.; Moyseev, N. N., Orlovskii, S. A. (Eds.) (1976). Onyatie lingvisticheskoy peremennoy I ego primenenie k prinyatiyu priblijennih resheniy. Moscow: Mir. 165.
  4. Reva, A. N., Tymishwv, K. M. (2007). Chelovecheskiy factor I bezopasnost polyotov (proaktivnoe issledovani vliyaniya) Almati, 242.
  5. Reva, A. N., Borsuk, S. P., Mirzoev, B. M., Kamishin, V. V. (2013). Splayn-model formirovaniya professionalnih navikov u aviatsionnih operatorov. Baki, 89–97.
  6. Reva, O. M. (2000). Mikropodhod v modeli professionalnoy pidgotovki ta prognozuvannya tehniki pilotuvannya. Kirovograd, DLAU, 170‑188.
  7. Ventsel, E. S. (1969). Teoriya veroyatnostey. Moscow: Nauka, 576.
  8. Borsuk, S. P. (2013). Stohastichna model viyavlennya momentu pripinennya trenuvan aviatsiybih operatoriv. Kharkiv, 208–215.
  9. Borsuk, S. P. (2013). Skladovi stohastichnih pokaznikiv navchenosti dlya chotiryoh rejkimiv robori aviatsiynogo operatora. Iskusstvenniy intellek, 2 (60), 100–108.
  10. Sheffe, G. (1980). Dispersionniy analiz. Nauka, 512.
  11. Prohorov, S. S., Grafkin, V. V. (2010). Strukturno-spektralniy analiz sluchaynih processov. Samara: SNC RAN, 128.
  12. Sizova, T. M. (2005). Statistika SpB, GUITMO, 80.
  13. Utkyna, V. F., Krjuchkova, Ju. V. (Eds.) (1988). Nadejnost I effektivnost v tehnike. Spravochbik v 10 t. T 3 Effektivnost tehnicheskih system. vMashinostroenie. 328.
  14. Peregudov, F. I., Tarasenko, F. P. (1989). Vvedenie v sistemniy analiz. Moscow: Vishshaya shkola, 367.
  15. Adler, Y. P., Markova, E. V., Granovskiy, Y. V. (1976). Planirovanie eksperimenta pri pioske optimalnih usloviy. Moscow: Nauka, 277.
  16. Reva, A. N., Vdovichenko, V. I., Borsuk, S. P. et al. (2013). Aktualnie napravleniya razrabotki proktivnih modeley resheniya “treugolnika riskov”. Kherson: ICAO HDMA, 334–338.
  17. Afifi, A., Eyzen, S. (1982). Statisticheskiy analiz: Podhod s ispolzovaniem EVM. Moscow: Mir, 488.
  18. Ayvazyan, S. A., Mhitaryan, V. S. (2001). Prikladnaya statistika, osnovi ekonometrii. Moscow: YUNITI-DANA, 656.
  19. Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F., Tukey, J. W. (2000). Understanding Robustand Exploratory Data Analysis. JohnWiley&Sons, 448.

Published

2015-02-27

How to Cite

Борсук, С. П. (2015). Analysis of admissibility of central tendency measures to estimate aviation operator progress. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(3(73), 49–52. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.37795

Issue

Section

Control processes