Estimation of transport accessibility of the Capital Economic Region

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.98118

Keywords:

transport accessibility, transport planning, transport network, road

Abstract

The methodology for estimation of potential transport accessibility of the region, which requires merely open data, was identified. The choice of the Capital Economic Region as the region for estimation of transport accessibility was validated. The study solved the problem of adapting the foreign approach to calculation of potential transport accessibility of the Capital Economic Region.

The highlight of the given research is the application of Euclidean distance between the cities (nodes) and the total of activity types available in the destination node as the initial data for estimating transport accessibility.

The proposed methodology of potential road transport accessibility estimation of the region enables revealing of the potential deficiencies in the transport infrastructure of the region. This is provided by the special feature of the methodology which is based on the suggested equation for calculation of transport accessibility and the scale developed in the paper. The scale contains seven levels of potential transport accessibility of the Capital Economic Region and it enables quantitative evaluation of the transport accessibility values for the given city (node) in relation to the set of other cities (nodes). Thus, the degree of spatial separation of the cities related to the regional center can be defined.

The given methodology can be applied for other regions of Ukraine to evaluate current efficiency of the road transportation network. It is recommended to devise a new scale for evaluating potential transport accessibility while applying the proposed methodology to another region. Other possible applications of the methodology include urban planning, transport planning, creating and / or developing regional transport systems.

Author Biographies

Olena Matiychyk, National Aviation University Kosmonavta Komarova ave., 1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03058

Senior Lecturer

Department of Air Transportation

Andriі Babenko, National Aviation University Kosmonavta Komarova ave., 1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03058

PhD

Center of Advanced Technologies

Peter Yanovsky, National Aviation University Kosmonavta Komarova ave., 1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03058

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Air Transportation

Liudmyla Sulyma, National Aviation University Kosmonavta Komarova ave., 1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03058

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Air Transportation

References

  1. Matiychyk, O., Kryshkevych, K. (2013). Accessibility of transport systems in passenger transportation. Science-Based Technologies, 18 (2). doi: 10.18372/2310-5461.18.4984
  2. Yanovsky, P., Matiychyk, O. (2014). Іnfrastructure approach to measuring passenger transport accessibility. Railway Transport of Ukraine, 6 (109), 14–18.
  3. Yanovsky, P., Matiychyk, O. (2013). Otsinka dostupnosti pasazhirskogo transportu na regionalnomu rivni. Science-based technologies, 3 (19), 345–349.
  4. Dubel, V. (2014). Osoblyvosti ekologo-ekonomichnogo rozvytku regioniv Ukrayiny. Bullein of Donetsk National University. Series C. Economics and Law, 1, 52–56.
  5. Litman, T. (2012). Evaluating Accessibility for Transport Planning: Measuring People’s Ability to Reach Desired Goods and Activities. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 56.
  6. Yatskiv (Jackiva), I., Budilovich, E. (2017). Evaluating Riga Transport System Accessibility. Procedia Engineering, 178, 480–490. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.091
  7. Karou, S., Hull, A. (2014). Accessibility modelling: predicting the impact of planned transport infrastructure on accessibility patterns in Edinburgh, UK. Journal of Transport Geography, 35, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.002
  8. Guzman, L. A., Oviedo, D., Rivera, C. (2017). Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region. Journal of Transport Geography, 58, 236–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.12.016
  9. Wang, Y., Monzon, A., Ciommo, F. D. (2015). Assessing the accessibility impact of transport policy by a land-use and transport interaction model – The case of Madrid. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.03.005
  10. Zondag, B., de Bok, M., Geurs, K. T., Molenwijk, E. (2015). Accessibility modeling and evaluation: The TIGRIS XL land-use and transport interaction model for the Netherlands. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 115–125. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.06.001
  11. Monzon, A., Ortega, E., Lopez, E. (2013). Efficiency and spatial equity impacts of high-speed rail extensions in urban areas. Cities, 30, 18–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2011.11.002
  12. Kim, H., Sultana, S. (2015). The impacts of high-speed rail extensions on accessibility and spatial equity changes in South Korea from 2004 to 2018. Journal of Transport Geography, 45, 48–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.04.007
  13. Shaw, S.-L., Fang, Z., Lu, S., Tao, R. (2014). Impacts of high speed rail on railroad network accessibility in China. Journal of Transport Geography, 40, 112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.03.010
  14. Lopez, E., Monzon, A., Ortega, E., Mancebo Quintana, S. (2009). Assessment of Cross‐Border Spillover Effects of National Transport Infrastructure Plans: An Accessibility Approach. Transport Reviews, 29 (4), 515–536. doi: 10.1080/01441640802627974
  15. Zajac, A. P. (2016). City Accessible for Everyone – Improving Accessibility of Public Transport Using the Universal Design Concept. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 1270–1276. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.199
  16. Rotoli, F., Christidis, P., Vannacci, L., Lopez-Ruiz, H. G., Navajas, C. E., Ibanez, R. N. (2014). Potential Impacts on Accessibility and Consumer Surplus of Improvements of the European Railway System. Transportation Research Procedia, 3, 319–328. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.012
  17. Yamaguchi, K. (2007). Inter-regional air transport accessibility and macro-economic performance in Japan. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43 (3), 247–258. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2006.10.004
  18. Martinez, L. M., Viegas, J. M. (2013). A new approach to modelling distance-decay functions for accessibility assessment in transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 26, 87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.08.018
  19. Tranos, E., Reggiani, A., Nijkamp, P. (2013). Accessibility of cities in the digital economy. Cities, 30, 59–67. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2012.03.001
  20. Zadvornyj, Ju. V. (2011). Kriterii ocenki razvitija transportnoj infrastruktury regiona. Rossijskoe predprinimatel'stvo, 1 (175), 168–168.
  21. Melendez, J. H., Rietveld, P., Verhoef, P.(2007). On the change in surpluses equivalence: measuring benefits from transport infrastructure investments. European Transport, 36, 107–140.
  22. Johansson, B. (2007). Transport Infrastructure Inside and Across Urban Regions. OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers. doi: 10.1787/234705655722
  23. Mezentseva, N., Mezentsev, K. (2010). Ekonomichna i sotsialna geografIya Ukrainy. Kyiv: Vydavnycho-polihrafichnyy tsentr „Kyyivs'kyy universytet”, 239.
  24. Ischuk, S., Gladkуy, A. (2013). Kyivskiy stolychniy region: yogo mezhi, funktsiyita napryamy rozvitku. Economic and social geography, 1 (66), 21–31.
  25. Doroshenko, V., Dіdenko, K. (2005). Osnovni pokaznyky ta indikatory funktsionuvannya pasazhirskoyi avtotransportnoyi systemy. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, 35–36.
  26. Agasyants, A. (2010). Razvitie seti avtomobilnyih magistraley v krupneyshih gorodah. Transportno-gradostroitelnyie problemyi. Moscow: Published at ACB, 248.
  27. Morris, J. M., Dumble, P. L., Wigan, M. R. (1979). Accessibility indicators for transport planning. Transportation Research Part A: General, 13 (2), 91–109. doi: 10.1016/0191-2607(79)90012-8
  28. Schurmann, C., Talaat, A. (2000). Towards a European Peripherality Index Final Report. Report for General Directorate XVI Regional Policy of the European Commission. Institut fur Raumplanung Fakultat Raumplanung, Universitat Dortmund, 48.
  29. Spiekermann, K., Wegener, M., Kveton, V., Marada, M., Schurmann, C., Biosca, O. et. al. (2013). TRACC Transport Accessibility at Regional/Local Scale and Patterns in Europe. Applied Research 2013/1/10. ESPON, 164. Available at: http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/AppliedResearch/TRACC/TRACC_Interim_Report_210211.pdf

Downloads

Published

2017-04-29

How to Cite

Matiychyk, O., Babenko, A., Yanovsky, P., & Sulyma, L. (2017). Estimation of transport accessibility of the Capital Economic Region. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(3 (86), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.98118

Issue

Section

Control processes