Development of the combined method for evaluating and controlling the reliability indicator «probability of failure-free switching» of a radio technical complex

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.225484

Keywords:

assessment and control of fault-free operation, operation based on technical condition, radio-technical complex

Abstract

The operation of a radio-technical complex based on a technical condition is represented by cycles. Each cycle implies control over a limiting state in order to make timely and informed decisions on managing the operation of a radio-technical complex. That should resolve the task of assessing and monitoring the indicators of fault-free operation with the required accuracy and reliability based on operational observations and, if necessary, special tests that could minimize the cost of special tests.

Given the introduction for a radio-technical complex of the repeated application of a new indicator of fault-free operation «the probability of trouble-free switching», a combined method of its evaluation and control has been developed. This method is a set of known and developed criteria, models, methods, and schemes that determines the sequence of their application for joint evaluation and control of this indicator.

The criteria for verifying the uniformity of data on the operational observations and special tests for the fault-free operation of a radio-technical complex have been defined, as well as the corresponding models for assessing the one-sided lower confidence boundaries of the indicator under consideration, and the methods to control it.

The devised method makes it possible to derive estimates of the probability of trouble-free switching, as well as the magnitudes of the observed risks of decisions being made with acceptable accuracy and reliability.

The results of modeling the devised combined method helped obtain the accuracy and reliability of its estimates and the observed risks of controls carried out. Recommendations have been compiled for applying the method to address the challenges of joint assessment and control of the probability of trouble-free switching of the considered complexes

Author Biographies

Vadim Lukianchuk, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Senior Researcher, Head of Department

Research Department for the Development of the WME system of the Air Force Air Defense Forces of the Air Force Science Center

Boris Lanetskii, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Leading Researcher

Research Department for the Development of the WME system of the Air Force Air Defense Forces of the Air Force Science Center

Hennadii Khudov, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Radar Troops Tactic

Oleksii Zvieriev, Central Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor, Researcher

Research Laboratory of Automation of Scientific Researches

Ivan Terebuha, Combat unit A0800

PhD

Volodymyr Kuprii, Combat unit A0105

PhD, Associate Professor, Deputy Head of Department

Department of Training Command

Kostyantyn Borysenko, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

Senior Lecturer

Department of Air Defense Weapons Land Forces

Artem Artemenko, Ivan Chernyakhovsky National Defense University of Ukraine

Senior Research

Department of Radio-Technical and Special Troops

Oleh Aristarkhov, Ivan Chernyakhovsky National Defense University of Ukraine

Adjunct

Department of Technical Support

Yulii Kondratenko, Ivan Chernyakhovsky National Defense University of Ukraine

Adjunct

The Center for Military and Strategic Studies

References

  1. Lanetskiy, B. M., Lukjanchuk, V. V., Artemenko, A. A. (2016). Complex evaluation of faultness and residual durability characteristics of the difficult technical systems that are exploites on the technical state. Generalities. Systemy obrobky informatsiyi, 2 (139), 40–43.
  2. Lanetskii, B., Lukyanchuk, V., Khudov, H., Fisun, M., Zvieriev, O., Terebuha, I. (2020). Developing the model of reliability of a complex technical system of repeated use with a complex operating mode. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (4 (107)), 55–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.214995
  3. Gnedenko, B. V., Belyaev, Yu. K., Solov'ev, A. D. (2017). Matematicheskie metody v teorii nadezhnosti. Osnovnye harakteristiki nadezhnosti i ih statisticheskiy analiz. Moscow: KD Librokom, 582.
  4. Ruban, I., Khudov, H., Lishchenko, V., Zvonko, A., Glukhov, S., Khizhnyak, I. et. al. (2020). The Calculating Effectiveness Increasing of Detecting Air Objects by Combining Surveillance Radars into The Coherent System. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8 (4), 1295–1301. doi: https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/58842020
  5. Barabash, O. V., Dakhno, N. B., Shevchenko, H. V., Majsak, T. V. (2017). Dynamic models of decision support systems for controlling UAV by two-step variational-gradient method. 2017 IEEE 4th International Conference Actual Problems of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Developments (APUAVD). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/apuavd.2017.8308787
  6. Khudov, H., Zvonko, A., Khizhnyak, I., Shulezko, V., Khlopiachyi, V., Chepurnyi, V., Yuzova, I. (2020). The Synthesis of the Optimal Decision Rule for Detecting an Object in a Joint Search and Detection of Objects by the Criterion of Maximum Likelihood. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8 (2), 520–524. doi: https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/40822020
  7. Belyaev, Yu. K. et. al.; Ushakov, I. A. (Ed.) (1985). Nadezhnost' tehnicheskih sistem. Moscow: Radio i svyaz', 608.
  8. Sudakov, R. S., Teskin, O. I. (Eds.) (1989). Nadezhnost' i effektivnost' v tehnike. Vol. 6: Eksperimental'naya otrabotka i ispytaniya. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 376.
  9. DSTU 2864-94. Industrial product dependability reliability. Experimental determinating and complinating. Basic principles.
  10. Grodzenskiy, S. Ya. (1981). Ratsional'nye plany ispytaniy promyshlennyh izdeliy na nadezhnost'. Moscow: Znanie, 57.
  11. Viktorova, V. S., Stepanyants, A. S. (2016). Modeli i metody rascheta nadezhnosti tehnicheskih sistem. Moscow: LENAND, 256.
  12. Kredentser, B. P. (2019). Raschet pokazateley nadezhnosti tehnicheskih sistem s izbytochnost'yu. Kyiv: Feniks, 520.
  13. Tobias, P. A., Trindade, D. (2012). Applied Reliability. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 600. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/b11787
  14. Kuzavkov, V., Khusainov, P., Vavrichen, O. (2017). Evaluation of the same type firmware network technical condition. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoi akademiyi Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Ser.: Viyskovi ta tekhnichni nauky, 3, 314–323.
  15. Zhang, W., Zhang, G., Ran, Y., Shao, Y. (2018). The full-state reliability model and evaluation technology of mechatronic product based on meta-action unit. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10 (5), 168781401877419. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018774191
  16. Peng, D., Zichun, N., Bin, H. (2018). A New Analytic Method of Cold Standby System Reliability Model with Priority. MATEC Web of Conferences, 175, 03060. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817503060
  17. Guo, J., Wang, X., Liang, J., Pang, H., Goncalves, J. (2018). Reliability Modeling and Evaluation of MMCs Under Different Redundancy Schemes. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 33 (5), 2087–2096. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.2017.2715664
  18. Ding, F., Sheng, L., Ao, Z. et. al. (2017). Research on reliability prediction method for traction power supply equipment based on continuous time Markov degradation process. Proc CSEE, 37, 1937–1945.
  19. Hou, K., Jia, H., Li, X., Xu, X., Mu, Y., Jiang, T., Yu, X. (2018). Impact‐increment based decoupled reliability assessment approach for composite generation and transmission systems. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 12 (3), 586–595. doi: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-gtd.2017.0745
  20. Peng, W., Shen, L., Shen, Y., Sun, Q. (2018). Reliability analysis of repairable systems with recurrent misuse-induced failures and normal-operation failures. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 171, 87–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.11.016
  21. Polovko, A. M., Gurov, S. V. (2006). Osnovy teorii nadezhnosti. Sankt-Peterburg: BHV-Peterburg, 702.
  22. Savchuk, V. P. (1989). Bayesovskie metody statisticheskogo otsenivaniya: Nadezhnost' tehnicheskih obektov. Moscow: Nauka. Gl. red. fiz.-mat. lit., 328.
  23. Teskin, O. I. (1981). Otsenka nadezhnosti sistem na etape eksperimental'noy otrabotki. Sbornik: Obrabotka rezul'tatov ispytaniy na nadezhnost'. Moscow: Znanie, 12–31.
  24. Khudov, H., Khizhnyak, I., Zots, F., Misiyuk, G., Serdiuk, O. (2020). The Bayes Rule of Decision Making in Joint Optimization of Search and Detection of Objects in Technical Systems. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8 (1), 7–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/02812020
  25. Khudov, H., Lishchenko, V., Lanetskii, B., Lukianchuk, V., Stetsiv, S., Kravchenko, I. (2020). The Coherent Signals Processing Method in the Multiradar System of the Same Type Two-coordinate Surveillance Radars with Mechanical Azimuthal Rotation. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8 (6), 2624–2630. doi: https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/66862020

Downloads

Published

2021-02-27

How to Cite

Lukianchuk, V., Lanetskii, B., Khudov, H., Zvieriev, O., Terebuha, I., Kuprii, V., Borysenko, K., Artemenko, A., Aristarkhov, O., & Kondratenko, Y. (2021). Development of the combined method for evaluating and controlling the reliability indicator «probability of failure-free switching» of a radio technical complex . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(9 (109), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.225484

Issue

Section

Information and controlling system