Modeling of the process approach to the life cycle of measuring instruments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.231225

Keywords:

process approach, life cycle, quality system, measuring instrument, set model

Abstract

The problem of increasing the reliability and competitiveness of products in all sectors of the national economy can be solved only on the basis of obtaining complete and reliable measurement information. This is facilitated by modern measuring instruments (MI), which are complex hardware and software systems. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that modern MI need an effective assessment of their quality at all stages of the life cycle (LC). This requires the development of appropriate assessment methods both at the stage of production and operation of MI.

The expediency of using the process approach to MI LC stages and its advantages over the functional approach were proved. The process approach allows more effective assessment of MI quality indicators at different LC stages and is compatible with the construction of modern quality management systems.

Mathematical modeling was carried out, a set process model of the MI LC was developed and its representation as a process V-model was carried out. This allows studying the interaction of processes of all MI LC stages and performing process quality management at all MI LC stages.

Mathematical modeling was carried out, a set process model of evaluation of quality indicators of MI LC stages was developed and its representation as a process V-model was carried out. This allows evaluating quality indicators of the MI and its components throughout the MI LC.

Recommendations for the use of international standards were formulated, in particular for project management planning, measurement processes, system requirements throughout the MI LC, risk analysis and management at the LC stages. This should help increase efficiency in achieving the planned results at all stages of the MI LC

Author Biographies

Oleh Velychko, State Enterprise “All-Ukrainian State Scientific and Production Centre for Standardization, Metrology, Certification and Protection of Consumer” (SE “Ukrmetrteststandard”)

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Director

Scientific and Production Institute of Electromagnetic Measurements

Oleh Hrabovskyi, State University of Intellectual Technologies and Communications

PhD, Associate Professor, Dean

Faculty of Metrology, Automation and Electronics

Tetyana Gordiyenko, State University of Intellectual Technologies and Communications

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Standardization, Conformity Assessment and Educational Measurements

Serhii Volkov, State University of Intellectual Technologies and Communications

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Automated Systems and Information and Measurement Technologies

References

  1. Adizes, I. K. (2014). Managing Corporate Lifecycles. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 512.
  2. Sokolovskyi, S. A., Pavlov, S. P., Cherkashyna, M. V., Naumenko, M. O., Hrabovskyi, Ye. M. (2015). Upravlinnia yakistiu vyrobnytstva ta obcluhovuvannia. Kharkiv: NANHU, 264.
  3. Biletskyi, E. V., Yanushkevych, D. A., Shaikhlislamov, Z. R. (2015). Upravlinnia yakistiu produktsiyi ta posluh. Kharkiv: KhTEI, 222.
  4. Kalycheva, N. Ye., Bokhan, S. Ye. (2017). Napriamy zabezpechennia efektyvnoho rozvytku promyslovykh pidpryiemstv v suchasnykh umovakh. Naukovyi ohliad, 5 (37), 5–15.
  5. ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2015. Systems and software engineering. System life cycle processes (2015). ISO, 108.
  6. ISO/IEC/IEEE 24748-1:2018. Systems and software engineering. Life cycle management. Part 1: Guidelines for life cycle management (2018). ISO, 72.
  7. ISO/IEC/IEEE 24748-2:2018. Systems and software engineering. Life cycle management. Part 2: Guidelines for the application of ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288 (System life cycle processes) (2018). ISO, 64.
  8. ISO/IEC TR 24774:2010. Systems and software engineering. Life cycle management. Guidelines for process description (2010). ISO, 15.
  9. ISO 9000:2015. Quality management systems. Fundamentals and vocabulary (2015). ISO, 51.
  10. ISO 9001:2015. Quality management systems. Requirements (2015). ISO, 29.
  11. Directive 2014/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to the making available on the market of measuring instruments (recast). Official Journal of the European Union (2014). L96/149. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32014L0032
  12. ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207:2017. Systems and software engineering. Software life cycle processes (2017). ISO, 145.
  13. ISO/IEC/IEEE 24748-3:2020. Systems and software engineering. Life cycle management. Part 3: Guidelines for the application of ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207 (software life cycle processes) (2020). ISO, 66.
  14. Lisovodskaya, K., Shadrin, A. (2019). Protsessniy podhod v menedzhmente proektov Agile-kompanii. Standarty i kachestvo, 9, 76–80.
  15. Velychko, O., Gordiyenko, T., Hrabovskyi, O. (2018). Testing of measurement instrument software on the national level. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (9 (92)), 13–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.125994
  16. Velychko, O., Gaman, V., Gordiyenko, T., Hrabovskyi, O. (2019). Testing of measurement instrument software with the purpose of conformity assessment. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (9 (97)), 19–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.154352
  17. Shadrin, A. D. (2016). Sistemnaya inzheneriya v menedzhmente kachestva predpriyatiya. Standarty i kachestvo, 1, 58–61.
  18. Borysova, L. E. (2015). Process – functional approach in system management of modern telecommunication company. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Ser.: Ekonomichni nauky, 11 (2), 55–59.
  19. Novikova, O., Shadrin, A. (2014). Protsessniy podhod v energeticheskom menedzhmente. Standarty i kachestvo, 8, 70–73.
  20. Kalmykov, A. V. (2012). Upravlenie proektami informatsionnyh sistem na osnove dual-V modeli. Radioelektronni i kompiuterni systemy, 4, 193–200.
  21. Volkov, S. L., Kyselova, O. I. (2017). Dual-v protsesna model yakosti shtuchnoho obiektu. Metrolohiya ta prylady, 6, 62–65.
  22. Velychko, О. М., Hrabovskiy, O. V., Gordiyenko, T. B. (2019). Features of application of V-model in development and estimation of measuring instruments software. Collection of scientific works of the Odesa State Academy of Technical Regulation and Quality, 1 (14), 6–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.32684/2412-5288-2019-1-14-6-11
  23. Graessler, I., Hentze, J., Poehler, A. (2019). Self-organizing production systems: Implications for product design. Procedia CIRP, 79, 546–550. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.092
  24. Graessler, I., Hentze, J., Bruckmann, T. (2018). V-models for interdisciplinary systems engineering. Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference. doi: https://doi.org/10.21278/idc.2018.0333
  25. VDI 2206:2004. Design methodology for mechatronic systems. Guideline. The Association of German Engineers (VDI), Düsseldorf, 2004. 118 р.
  26. Gräßler, I., Hentze, J., Yang, X. (2016). Eleven Potentials for Mechatronic V-Model. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Production Engineering and Management, 257–268.
  27. Graessler, I. (2017). A new V-Model for interdisciplinary product engineering. 59th Ilmenau Scientific Colloquiu. Technische Universität Ilmenau.
  28. Graessler, I., Dattner, M., Bothen, M. (2018). Main Feature List as core success criteria of organizing Requirements Elicitation. R&D Management Conference 2018 “R&Designing Innovation: Transformational Challenges for Organizations and Society”, 16. doi: https://doi.org/10.31224/osf.io/grfcn
  29. Gräßler, I., Hentze, J. (2015). A V-model based comparison of Systems Engineering approaches. Proceedings of ECEC 2015/the 22nd European Concurrent Engineering Conference. Lisbon.
  30. Stephens, K. S. (Eds.) (2004). Juran, Quality, and a Century of Improvement: The Best on Quality Book Series of the International Academy for Quality. Vol. 15. ASQ Quality Press, 304.
  31. Volkov, S. L., Vavilov, E. V., Kolomiets, S. V. (2017). System model of process of the life cycle of artificial systems. Collection of scientific works of the Odesa State Academy of Technical Regulation and Quality, 1 (10), 84–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.32684/2412-5288-2017-1-10-84-87
  32. ISO/IEC 25010:2011. Systems and software engineering. Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and software quality models (2011). ISO, 34.
  33. ISO/IEC 25012:2008. Software engineering. Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE). Data quality model (2008). ISO, 13.
  34. ISO/IEC 25020:2019. Systems and software engineering. Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE). Quality measurement framework (2019). ISO, 27.
  35. ISO/IEC 25021:2012. Systems and software engineering. Systems and software Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE). Quality measure elements (2012). ISO, 37.
  36. ISO/IEC 25030:2019. Systems and software engineering. Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE). Quality requirements framework (2019). ISO, 46.
  37. Skopa, A., Volkov, S., Grabowski, О. (2013). Quality indicators and life cycles of protected information-measuring systems. Visnyk Skhidnoukrainskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Dalia, 15 (1), 192–198.
  38. ISO/IEC/IEEE 16326:2019. Systems and software engineering. Life cycle processes. Project management (2019). ISO, 29.
  39. ISO/IEC/IEEE 15939:2017. Systems and software engineering. Measurement process (2017). ISO, 39.
  40. ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018. Systems and software engineering. Life cycle processes. Requirements engineering (2018). ISO, 92.
  41. ISO 31000:2018. Risk management. Guidelines (2018). ISO, 16.
  42. ISO/IEC/IEEE 16085:2021. Systems and software engineering. Life cycle processes. Risk management (2021). ISO, 47.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Velychko, O., Hrabovskyi, O., Gordiyenko, T., & Volkov, S. (2021). Modeling of the process approach to the life cycle of measuring instruments. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(9(111), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.231225

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 9(111) (2021): Information and controlling system

Section

Information and controlling system

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Oleh Velychko, Oleh Hrabovskyi, Tetyana Gordiyenko, Serhii Volkov

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.