Evaluating image encryption algorithms for the hyperchaotic system and fibonacci q-matrix, secure internet of things, and advanced encryption standard

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.265862

Keywords:

Fibonacci Q-matrix in hyperchaotic, secure internet of things, AES

Abstract

In the era of information technology, users had to send millions of images back and forth daily. It's crucial to secure these photos. It is important to secure image content using digital image encryption. Using secret keys, digital images are transformed into noisy images in image encryption techniques, and the same keys are needed to restore the images to their original form. The majority of image encryption methods rely on two processes: confusion and diffusion. However, previous studies didn’t compare recent techniques in the image encryption field.This research presents an evaluation of three types of image encryption algorithms includinga Fibonacci Q-matrix in hyperchaotic, Secure Internet of Things (SIT), and AES techniques. The Fibonacci Q-matrix in the hyperchaotic technique makes use of a six-dimension hyperchaotic system's randomly generated numbers and confuses the original image to dilute the permuted image. The objectives here areto analyze the image encryption process for the Fibonacci Q-matrix in hyperchaotic, Secure Internet of Things (SIT), and Advanced Encryption Standard (AES), and compare their encryption robustness. The discussed image encryption techniques were examined through histograms, entropy, Unified Average Changing Intensity (UACI), Number of Pixels Change Rate (NPCR), and correlation coefficients. Since the values of the Chi-squared test were less than (293) for the Hyperchaotic System & Fibonacci Q-matrix method, this indicates that this technique has a uniform distribution and is more efficient. The obtained results provide important confirmation that the image encryption using Fibonacci Q-matrix in hyperchaotic algorithm performed better than both the AES and SIT based on the image values of UACI and NPCR.

Author Biographies

Sabreen Ali Hussein, University of Babylon

Master of Computer Science

Department of Mathematics and Computer

College of Basic Education

Aseel Hamoud Hamza, University of Babylon

Masterof Computer Science

College of Law

Suhad Al-Shoukry, AL- Furat Al-Awsat Technical University

Lecturer of Communication Engineering

Department of Computer system Techniques

AL-Najaf Technical Institute

Musaddak Maher Abdul Zahra, Al-Mustaqbal University College

PhD student

Department of Computer Techniques Engineering

Ali Saleem Abu Nouwar, Faculty of Technical Engineering Mesallata

MSc Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Sarah Ali Abdulkareem, Al-Turath University College

Master in Computer Science

Department of Computer Science

Mohammed Hasan Ali, Imam Ja’afar Al-Sadiq University

Master in Computer Science

Computer Techniques Engineering Department

Faculty of Information Technology

Mustafa Musa Jaber, Dijlah University College

Computer Techniques Engineering Department

References

  1. Saddam, M. J., Ibrahim, A. A., Mohammed, A. H. (2020). A Lightweight Image Encryption And Blowfish Decryption For The Secure Internet Of Things. 2020 4th International Symposium on Multidisciplinary Studies and Innovative Technologies (ISMSIT). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ismsit50672.2020.9254366
  2. Mishra, Z., Acharya, B. (2020). High throughput and low area architectures of secure IoT algorithm for medical image encryption. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 53, 102533. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2020.102533
  3. Rabab, U. e, Ahmed, I., Aslam, M. I., Usman, M. (2018). FPGA Implementation of Secure Internet of Things (SIT) Algorithm for High Throughput Area Ratio. International Journal of Future Generation Communication and Networking, 11 (5), 63–72. doi: https://doi.org/10.14257/ijfgcn.2018.11.5.06
  4. Usman, M., Ahmed, I., Imran, M., Khan, S., Ali, U. (2017). SIT: A Lightweight Encryption Algorithm for Secure Internet of Things. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2017.080151
  5. Hosny, K. M., Kamal, S. T., Darwish, M. M., Papakostas, G. A. (2021). New Image Encryption Algorithm Using Hyperchaotic System and Fibonacci Q-Matrix. Electronics, 10 (9), 1066. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10091066
  6. Hosny, K. M., Kamal, S. T., Darwish, M. M. (2022). Novel encryption for color images using fractional-order hyperchaotic system. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 13 (2), 973–988. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03675-y
  7. Padole, M. (2013). Distributed computing for structured storage, retrieval and processing of DNA sequencing data. International Journal ofInternet and Web Technology, 38, 1113–1118.
  8. Tanougast, C., Dandache, A., Salah, M., Sadoudi, S. (2012). Hardware Design of Embedded Systems for Security Applications. Embedded Systems – High Performance Systems, Applications and Projects. doi: https://doi.org/10.5772/38649
  9. Gamido, H. V., Sison, A. M., Medina, R. P. (2018). Implementation of Modified AES as Image Encryption Scheme. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI), 6 (3). doi: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeei.v6i3.490
  10. Zhang, Y. (2018). Test and Verification of AES Used for Image Encryption. 3D Research, 9 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13319-017-0154-7
  11. Shariatzadeh, M., Rostami, M. J., Eftekhari, M. (2021). Proposing a novel Dynamic AES for image encryption using a chaotic map key management approach. Optik, 246, 167779. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.167779
  12. Gaur, P. (2021). AES Image Encryption (Advanced Encryption Standard). International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 9 (12), 1357–1363. doi: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.39542
  13. Vijayakumar, P., Chittoju, C. K., Bharadwaja, A. V., Tayade, P. P., Tamilselvi, M., Rajashree, R., Gao, X. Z. (2019). FPGA implementation of AES for image encryption and decryption. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8 (7), 807–812.
  14. Gamido, H. V., Sison, A. M., Medina, R. P. (2018). Modified AES for Text and Image Encryption. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 11 (3), 942. doi: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v11.i3.pp942-948
  15. Mohammed, A. B., Al-Mafrji, A. A. M., Yassen, M. S., Sabry, A. H. (2022). Developing plastic recycling classifier by deep learning and directed acyclic graph residual network. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (10 (116)), 42–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.254285
  16. Kaur, M., Singh, S., Kaur, M. (2021). Computational Image Encryption Techniques: A Comprehensive Review. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2021, 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5012496
  17. Zhang, X., Wang, L., Wang, Y., Niu, Y., Li, Y. (2020). An Image Encryption Algorithm Based on Hyperchaotic System and Variable-Step Josephus Problem. International Journal of Optics, 2020, 1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6102824
  18. Naim, M., Ali Pacha, A., Serief, C. (2021). A novel satellite image encryption algorithm based on hyperchaotic systems and Josephus problem. Advances in Space Research, 67 (7), 2077–2103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2021.01.018
  19. Wang, X., Su, Y., Luo, C., Nian, F., Teng, L. (2022). Color image encryption algorithm based on hyperchaotic system and improved quantum revolving gate. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81 (10), 13845–13865. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-022-12220-8
  20. Naim, M., Ali Pacha, A. (2021). New chaotic satellite image encryption by using some or all the rounds of the AES algorithm. Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, 1–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19393555.2021.1982082
  21. Han, F., Liao, X., Yang, B., Zhang, Y. (2017). A hybrid scheme for self-adaptive double color-image encryption. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 77 (11), 14285–14304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-017-5029-7
  22. Zhang, T., Li, S., Ge, R., Yuan, M., Ma, Y. (2016). A Novel 1D Hybrid Chaotic Map-Based Image Compression and Encryption Using Compressed Sensing and Fibonacci-Lucas Transform. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016, 1–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7683687
  23. Pan, C., Ye, G., Huang, X., Zhou, J. (2019). Novel Meaningful Image Encryption Based on Block Compressive Sensing. Security and Communication Networks, 2019, 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6572105
  24. Sun, S., Guo, Y., Wu, R. (2019). A Novel Image Encryption Scheme Based on 7D Hyperchaotic System and Row-column Simultaneous Swapping. IEEE Access, 7, 28539–28547. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2901870
  25. Chandramouli, R., Bapatla, S., Subbalakshmi, K. P., Uma, R. N. (2006). Battery power-aware encryption. ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, 9 (2), 162–180. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/1151414.1151417
Evaluating image encryption algorithms for the hyperchaotic system and fibonacci q-matrix, secure internet of things, and advanced encryption standard

Downloads

Published

2022-10-30

How to Cite

Hussein, S. A., Hamza, A. H., Al-Shoukry, S., Zahra, M. M. A., Nouwar, A. S. A., Abdulkareem, S. A., Ali, M. H., & Jaber, M. M. (2022). Evaluating image encryption algorithms for the hyperchaotic system and fibonacci q-matrix, secure internet of things, and advanced encryption standard. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(2(119), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.265862