Justification of the method for determining the reliability of the operator of a mobile fire fighting installation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.281009

Keywords:

fire installation operator, operator reliability, parameter variations, dynamic parameters, test impact

Abstract

The object of research is the operator of a mobile fire installation; the subject of research is the operator’s characteristics, particularly his reliability. The method of determining the reliability of a mobile fire installation operator as a functional element of a dynamic system is substantiated. Operator failure is interpreted as the output of its frequency characteristics beyond permissible limits. Analytical dependences for variations of the operator’s frequency characteristics on variations of its parameters – transmission coefficient, delay time, and time constant are constructed. The amplitude and phase reliability of the operator of a mobile fire installation are determined using the Laplace functions, the arguments of which are the permissible values of variations in the frequency characteristics of the operator and variations of its parameters. Determination of variations of operator parameters is carried out by the instrumental method using the operator’s activity monitoring system. The test effect on the operator of a mobile fire installation is carried out in the form of a rectangular pulse that formalizes the change in the position of the combustion cell at a priori a given distance over a priori predetermined time. A signal characterizing the operator’s response to the test impact is determined using the Laplace integral transform. Measuring the parameters of this signal allows you to determine the variations in operator parameters that are used to determine its reliability. It is shown that for variations of operator parameters, the values of which are 10.0 % with RMS deviations of 3.3 %, with a probability of 0.8715 the amplitude-frequency and phase-frequency characteristics at the time of its control will not differ from their nominal values by more than 5.0 %. The requirements regarding the reliability of the operator’s activity control system are determined

Author Biographies

Yuriy Abramov, National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Chief Researcher

Research Center

Oleksii Basmanov, National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Chief Researcher

Scientific Department on Problems of Civil Defense, Technogenic and Ecological Safety

Vitaliy Sobyna, National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Logistics and Technical Support of Rescue Operations

Vladimir Kohanenko, National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor, Lecturer

Department of Logistics and Technical Support of Rescue Operations

Valerii Kolomiiets, National University of Civil Defence of Ukraine

Lecturer

Department of Logistics and Technical Support of Rescue Operations

References

  1. Paris Firefighters Used This Remote-Controlled Robot to Extinguish the Notre Dame Blaze. Available at: https://spectrum.ieee.org/colossus-the-firefighting-robot-that-helped-save-notre-dame#toggle-gdpr
  2. Firefighter Drones – How Drones are Being Used for Helping Fire Departments. Available at: https://dronenodes.com/firefighter-drones/
  3. Villani, V., Czerniak, J. N., Sabattini, L., Mertens, A., Fantuzzi, C. (2019). Measurement and classification of human characteristics and capabilities during interaction tasks. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, 10 (1), 182–192. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0016
  4. Shneiderman, B. (2020). Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36 (6), 495–504. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118
  5. Barosz, P., Gołda, G., Kampa, A. (2020). Efficiency Analysis of Manufacturing Line with Industrial Robots and Human Operators. Applied Sciences, 10 (8), 2862. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app10082862
  6. Angelopoulou, A., Mykoniatis, K., Boyapati, N. R. (2020). Industry 4.0: The use of simulation for human reliability assessment. Procedia Manufacturing, 42, 296–301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.094
  7. Hou, L.-X., Liu, R., Liu, H.-C., Jiang, S. (2021). Two decades on human reliability analysis: A bibliometric analysis and literature review. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 151, 107969. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107969
  8. Park, J., Arigi, A. M., Kim, J. (2019). A comparison of the quantification aspects of human reliability analysis methods in nuclear power plants. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 133, 297–312. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2019.05.031
  9. Deng, X., Jiang, W. (2018). Dependence assessment in human reliability analysis using an evidential network approach extended by belief rules and uncertainty measures. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 117, 183–193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2018.03.028
  10. Abaei, M. M., Abbassi, R., Garaniya, V., Arzaghi, E., Bahoo Toroody, A. (2019). A dynamic human reliability model for marine and offshore operations in harsh environments. Ocean Engineering, 173, 90–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2018.12.032
  11. Ung, S.-T. (2019). Evaluation of human error contribution to oil tanker collision using fault tree analysis and modified fuzzy Bayesian Network based CREAM. Ocean Engineering, 179, 159–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.03.031
  12. Yang, Z., Abujaafar, K. M., Qu, Z., Wang, J., Nazir, S., Wan, C. (2019). Use of evidential reasoning for eliciting bayesian subjective probabilities in human reliability analysis: A maritime case. Ocean Engineering, 186, 106095. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.05.077
  13. Erdem, P., Akyuz, E. (2021). An interval type-2 fuzzy SLIM approach to predict human error in maritime transportation. Ocean Engineering, 232, 109161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109161
  14. Alvarenga, M. A. B., Frutuoso e Melo, P. F. (2019). A review of the cognitive basis for human reliability analysis. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 117, 103050. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2019.103050
  15. Abrishami, S., Khakzad, N., Hosseini, S. M., van Gelder, P. (2020). BN-SLIM: A Bayesian Network methodology for human reliability assessment based on Success Likelihood Index Method (SLIM). Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 193, 106647. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106647
  16. Mkrtchyan, L., Podofillini, L., Dang, V. N. (2015). Bayesian belief networks for human reliability analysis: A review of applications and gaps. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 139, 1–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.02.006
  17. Groth, K. M., Smith, R., Moradi, R. (2019). A hybrid algorithm for developing third generation HRA methods using simulator data, causal models, and cognitive science. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 191, 106507. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.106507
  18. Abramov, Y., Basmanov, O., Krivtsova, V., Sobyna, V., Sokolov, D. (2021). Developing a method for determining the dynamic parameters of the operator of a mobile fire engine based on a Segway. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (3 (111)), 58–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.233365
  19. Abramov, Yu. O., Sobyna, V. O., Tyshchenko, Ye. O., Khyzhniak, A. A. (2017). Pat. No. 124928 UA. Mobilna pozhezhna ustanovka. No. u201711464; declareted: 23.11.2017; published: 25.04.2018, Bul. No. 8. Available at: https://base.uipv.org/searchINV/search.php?action=viewdetails&IdClaim=246543
  20. Amin, A. A., Hasan, K. M. (2019). A review of Fault Tolerant Control Systems: Advancements and applications. Measurement, 143, 58–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.083
  21. Abramov, Y., Basmanov, O., Sobyna, V., Sokolov, D., Rahimov, S. (2022). Developing a method for determining the time parameters of a mobile fire extinguisher operator. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (2 (120)), 93–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.266825
  22. Abramov, Y., Basmanov, O., Sobyna, V., Kovalov, O., Feshchenko, A. (2023). Justification of the method for determining the dynamic parameters of the mobile fire fighting installation operator. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (2 (121)), 72–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.272318
  23. Abramov, Yu. O., Sobyna, V. O., Zakora, O. V., Feshchenko, A. B., Kravchenko, Ye. O. (2020). Pat. No. 146173 UA. Sposib kontroliu diyalnosti operatora mobilnoi pozhezhnoi ustanovky. No. u202006308, declareted: 29.09.2020; published: 10.01.2021, Bul. No. 3. Available at: https://base.uipv.org/searchINV/search.php?action=viewdetails&IdClaim=273989
Justification of the method for determining the reliability of the operator of a mobile fire fighting installation

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Abramov, Y., Basmanov, O., Sobyna, V., Kohanenko, V., & Kolomiiets, V. (2023). Justification of the method for determining the reliability of the operator of a mobile fire fighting installation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(3 (123), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.281009

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (123) (2023): Control processes

Section

Control processes

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Yuriy Abramov, Oleksii Basmanov, Vitaliy Sobyna, Vladimir Kohanenko, Valerii Kolomiiets

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.