A method for importance and risk assessment of main pipeline facilities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.285862

Keywords:

pipeline system, object importance assessment, analytic hierarchy process, membership function

Abstract

The issues of creating a method for solving a multi-criteria task of the importance and risk (hazard) assessment of trunk pipeline objects (sections) are considered. The method is developed on the basis of the analytic hierarchy process. Each object (section) of trunk pipelines is characterized by a set of particular criteria that have their own scale of possible values of different physical nature and different dominance in determining the overall object importance. In this regard, there is a problem of transition from estimates by physical parameters to dimensionless assessment using some membership function. The study proposes an approach to automating the process of assessing objects by particular parameters in the analytic hierarchy process. For this purpose, a method is proposed that allows experts to be excluded from the process of filling in the paired comparison matrix based on the formation of a system of rules. Having a vector of criteria importance and guided by a system of rules, it is enough to specify the actual values of criteria for each alternative to compare objects. Based on this method, a model has been developed that allowed experimental studies to be carried out in the developed software. This method, as well as the developed importance assessment and decision-making software, is used in the automated system of electrochemical protection of main pipelines. The results of evaluating the importance of criteria for the task of risk assessment of gas pipeline sections are presented. The results obtained and their practical implementation in the management of main gas pipelines confirmed the effectiveness of the developed method. This allows you to make decisions in situations where it is necessary to carry out a multi-criteria selection of currently effective solutions and management strategies, assess risks, prioritize elements and coordinate actions for modernization or development

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Prokhorov, National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute"

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Computer Sciences and Information Technologies

Valeriy Prokhorov, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD, Senior Researcher

Problem Research Laboratory of the Research Department

Andriy Tevyashev, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Applied Mathematics

Alisher Khussanov, Mukhtar Auezov South Kazakhstan University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Technological Machines and Equipment

Zhakhongir Khussanov, Mukhtar Auezov South Kazakhstan University

PhD

Testing Regional Laboratory of Engineering Profile "Structural and Biochemical Materials"

Dilfuza Turdybekova, Mukhtar Auezov South Kazakhstan University

Department of Technological Machines and Equipment

References

  1. Dawood, T., Elwakil, E., Novoa, H. M., Delgado, J. F. G. (2020). Soft computing for modeling pipeline risk index under uncertainty. Engineering Failure Analysis, 117, 104949. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104949
  2. Saaty, T. L. (1988). What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process? Mathematical Models for Decision Support, 109–121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83555-1_5
  3. Wang, X., Duan, Q. (2019). Improved AHP–TOPSIS model for the comprehensive risk evaluation of oil and gas pipelines. Petroleum Science, 16 (6), 1479–1492. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-019-00365-5
  4. Hwang, C.-L., Lai, Y.-J., Liu, T.-Y. (1993). A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Computers & Operations Research, 20 (8), 889–899. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-v
  5. Yong, D. (2005). Plant location selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 28 (7-8), 839–844. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2436-5
  6. Leal, J. E. (2020). AHP-express: A simplified version of the analytical hierarchy process method. MethodsX, 7, 100748. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.11.021
  7. Ba, Z., Wang, Y., Fu, J., Liang, J. (2021). Corrosion Risk Assessment Model of Gas Pipeline Based on Improved AHP and Its Engineering Application. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 47 (9), 10961–10979. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05496-9
  8. Zhou, Y., Xu, Q., Zhou, Y. (2021). Research and application of natural gas pipeline assessment method in Location Class upgrading areas. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, 1 (3), 360–366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpse.2021.09.008
  9. Lu, L., Liang, W., Zhang, L., Zhang, H., Lu, Z., Shan, J. (2015). A comprehensive risk evaluation method for natural gas pipelines by combining a risk matrix with a bow-tie model. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 25, 124–133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.04.029
  10. Li, X., Su, H., Zhang, J., Yang, N. (2021). A Robustness Evaluation Method of Natural Gas Pipeline Network Based on Topological Structure Analysis. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.730999
  11. Bi, A., Huang, S., Sun, X. (2023). Risk Assessment of Oil and Gas Pipeline Based on Vague Set-Weighted Set Pair Analysis Method. Mathematics, 11 (2), 349. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/math11020349
  12. Zhang, H., Feng, Q., Yan, B., Zheng, X., Yang, Y., Chen, J. et al. (2023). State of the Art of Oil and Gas Pipeline Vulnerability Assessments. Energies, 16 (8), 3439. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083439
  13. Yuhui, Z., Shiyu, L., Lijing, Z., Gang, T. (2018). Natural Gas Pipeline Network Risk Assessment Based on FMECA-Fuzzy Comprehensive Analysis. 2018 IEEE International Conference of Safety Produce Informatization (IICSPI). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/iicspi.2018.8690464
  14. He, S., Xu, H., Zhang, J., Xue, P. (2023). Risk assessment of oil and gas pipelines hot work based on AHP-FCE. Petroleum, 9 (1), 94–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petlm.2022.03.006
  15. Sheng, K., Lai, X., Chen, Y., Jiang, J., Zhou, L. (2021). Risk Assessment of Urban Gas Pipeline Based on Different Unknown Measure Functions. Tehnicki Vjesnik - Technical Gazette, 28 (5), 1605–1614. doi: https://doi.org/10.17559/tv-20201021110548
  16. Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., Zioło, M. (2019). Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection. Omega, 86, 107–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004
  17. Perevozova, I., Daliak, N., Lisova, O., Naumov, D. (2019). Application Of The Harrington Function To Assess The Performance Of Oil And Gas Companies. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Strategies, Models and Technologies of Economic Systems Management (SMTESM 2019). doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/smtesm-19.2019.70
  18. Prokhorov, O., Prokhorov, V., Khussanov, A., Khussanov, Z., Kaldybayeva, B., Turdybekova, D. (2022). Complete Integrated Automation of the Electrochemical Corrosion Protection System of Pipelines Based on IoT and Big Data Analytics. Computation, 10 (7), 123. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/computation10070123
A method for importance and risk assessment of main pipeline facilities

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31

How to Cite

Prokhorov, O., Prokhorov, V., Tevyashev, A., Khussanov, A., Khussanov, Z., & Turdybekova, D. (2023). A method for importance and risk assessment of main pipeline facilities. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(3 (124), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.285862

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (124) (2023): Control processes

Section

Control processes

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Oleksandr Prokhorov, Valeriy Prokhorov, Andriy Tevyashev, Alisher Khussanov, Zhakhongir Khussanov, Dilfuza Turdybekova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.