Assessing the possibility of using a variable-length launch vehicle with a polymer body for orbiting payload

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.306225

Keywords:

launch vehicle, variable length, polymer body, aerodynamic characteristics, suborbital trajectory

Abstract

The object of this study was the motion of an ultralight class variable-length launch vehicle made of a polymer body along the active phase of the trajectory. The work considers the solution to the problem of designing low-cost means of delivery to orbit, namely to the assessment of the possibility of removing the payload by a carrier rocket with a polymer body of variable length beyond the dense atmosphere of the Earth. For this purpose, ballistic projection of the trajectory of the launch vehicle was carried out taking into account overloading; its aerodynamic characteristics and peculiarities of aerothermodynamic processes occurring during flight in the atmospheric phase of the trajectory were determined. The closeness (up to 10 %) of the obtained results with known experimental data is shown. The influence of the aerodynamic force on the parameters of the launch vehicle motion was studied. A flight simulation was conducted, the results of which showed the fundamental possibility of launching a CubeSat 24U class payload using a launch vehicle with a polymer body of variable length to a suborbital trajectory with an altitude of about 300 km. At the same time, the effective longitudinal overload on the body of the launch vehicle does not exceed 4 units, and the temperature on the surface of the body does not exceed 300 K. A feature of the research is the use of a multidisciplinary approach, which implies taking into account the interrelationship of aerodynamic, thermodynamic, and ballistic processes. The established motion parameters, aerodynamic characteristics, and the surface heating temperature of the launch vehicle body are key values for further research on the design and analysis of a launch vehicle with a polymer body of variable length. These data could be used to calculate the mechanical and thermal loads acting on the structure of the launch vehicle during flight

Author Biographies

Aleksandr Golubek, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Cyber Security and Computer-Integrated Technologies

Serhii Aleksieienko, Dnipro University of Technology

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology and Materials Science

Mykola Dron, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Rocket and Space and Innovative Technologies

Andrii Dreus, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Fluid Mechanics and Energy and Mass Transfer

References

  1. Yemets, V., Sanin, F., Dzhur, Y., Masliany, M., Kostritsyn, O., Minteev, G. (2009). Single-stage small satellite launcher with combustible tank of polyethylene. Acta Astronautica, 64 (1), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2008.06.015
  2. Yemets, V., Sanin, F., Masliany, M., Kostritsyn, O., Minteev, G. (2010). Is the combustible inertial pico launch vehicle feasible? JBIS - Journal of the British Interplanetary Society, 63 (7), 249–259.
  3. Yemets, V., Harkness, P., Dron’, M., Pashkov, A., Worrall, K., Middleton, M. (2018). Autophage Engines: Toward a Throttleable Solid Motor. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 55 (4), 984–992. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.a34153
  4. Dron, M. M., Dubovyk, L. H., Holubek, O. V., Dreus, A. Yu., Yemets, A. V., Pashkov, A. V. (2019). Systemy vidvodu kosmichnykh obiektiv z nyzkykh navkolozemnykh orbit. Dnipro: LIRA, 218.
  5. Yemets, V., Dron, M., Pashkov, A., Dreus, A., Kositsyna, Ye., Yemets, M. et al. (2020). Method to preset G-load profile of launch vehicles. Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC.
  6. Yemets, V., Dron’, M., Pashkov, A. (2020). Autophage Engines: Method to Preset Gravity Load of Solid Rockets. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 57 (2), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.a34597
  7. Yemets, V., Dron, M., Dreus, A., Pashkov, A., Yemets, M. (2021). Heat flows in the gasification chamber of the polymer propelled autophage launch vehicle. Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress.
  8. Dreus, A., Yemets, V., Dron, M., Yemets, M., Golubek, A. (2021). A simulation of the thermal environment of a plastic body of a new type of launch vehicle at the atmospheric phase of the trajectory. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 94 (4), 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1108/aeat-04-2021-0100
  9. Dreus, А. Yu., Dron, М. М., Dubovik, L. G., Strembovsky, V. V. (2023). Assessment of the possibility of using polymers in the bodies of promising launch vehicles based on the heat resistance factor. Space Science and Technology, 29 (6), 03–12. https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2023.06.003
  10. Kondratiev, A. V. (2020). A concept of optimization of structural and technological parameters of polymer composite rocket units considering the character of their production. Space Science and Technology, 26 (6), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2020.06.005
  11. Kondratiev, A. V., Kovalenko, V. O. (2019). Optimization of design parameters of the main composite fairing of the launch vehicle under simultaneous force and thermal loading. Science and Technology, 25 (4), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.15407/knit2019.04.003
  12. Kondratiev, A., Potapov, O., Tsaritsynskyi, A., Nabokina, T. (2021). Optimal Design of Composite Shelled Sandwich Structures with a Honeycomb Filler. Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing IV, 546–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77719-7_54
  13. Kositsyna, O. S., Dron’, M. M., Yemets, V. V. (2020). The environmental impact assessment of emission from space launches: the promising propellants components selection. Journal of Chemistry and Technologies, 28 (2), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.15421/082020
  14. Kositsyna, O., Varlan, K., Dron, M., Kulyk, O. (2021). Determining energetic characteristics and selecting environmentally friendly components for solid rocket propellants at the early stages of design. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (6 (114)), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.247233
  15. Wang, L., He, G. Y., Wang, Q., Chen, L. S. (2020). An Engineering Method for Computing the Aerodynamics Performance of Hypersonic Vehicle. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 816 (1), 012006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/816/1/012006
  16. Yang, Z., Wang, S., Gao, Z. (2022). Studies on effects of wall temperature variation on heat transfer in hypersonic laminar boundary layer. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 190, 122790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2022.122790
  17. Zhao, M. (2021). Prediction and Validation Technologies of Aerodynamic Force and Heat for Hypersonic Vehicle Design. In Springer Aerospace Technology. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6526-1
  18. Dillenius, M. F. E., Nielsen, J. N. (1979). Computer Programs for Calculating Pressure Distributions Including Vortex Effects on Supersonic Monoplane or Cruciform Wing-Body-Tail Combinations with Round or Elliptical Bodies. NASA. Available at: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19810018506
  19. Cengizci, S., Uğur, Ö., Takizawa, K., Tezduyar, T. (2020). A Streamline-Upwind/Petrov-Galerkin Formulation For Supersonic and Hypersonic Flow Simulations. The 20th Biennial Computational Techniques and Applications Conference (CTAC2020). Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11511/94032
  20. Li, J., Jiang, D., Geng, X., Chen, J. (2021). Kinetic comparative study on aerodynamic characteristics of hypersonic reentry vehicle from near-continuous flow to free molecular flow. Advances in Aerodynamics, 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42774-021-00063-0
  21. Huang, T., He, G., Wang, Q. (2022). Calculation of Aerodynamic Characteristics of Hypersonic Vehicles Based on the Surface Element Method. Advances in Aerospace Science and Technology, 07 (02), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.4236/aast.2022.72007
  22. Furudate, M. A. (2022). MC-New: A Program to Calculate Newtonian Aerodynamic Coefficients Based on Monte-Carlo Integration. Aerospace, 9 (6), 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9060330
  23. Thomas, P. D., Vinokur, M., Bastianon, R. A., Conti, R. J. (1972). Numerical Solution for Three-Dimensional Inviscid Supersonic Flow. AIAA Journal, 10 (7), 887–894. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.50241
  24. Hussein, A. K, Khan, W. A., Sivasankaran, S., Mohammed, H. A., Adegun, I. K. (2013). Numerical simulation of three-dimensional supersonic flow around an aerodynamic bump. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 3 (7), 656–666.
  25. Marchenay, Y., Olazabal Loumé, M., Chedevergne, F. (2022). Hypersonic Turbulent Flow Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Simulations with Roughness and Blowing Effects. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 59 (5), 1686–1696. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.a35339
  26. Sofair, I. (1995). Improved Method for Calculating Exact Geodetic Latitude and Altitude. Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada294568
  27. Bin, Y., Huang, G., Kunz, R., Yang, X. I. A. (2024). Constrained Recalibration of Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Models. AIAA Journal, 62 (4), 1434–1446. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j063407
  28. Prihod'ko, A. A. (2008). Komp'yuternye tehnologii v aerogidrodinamike i teplomassoobmene. Kyiv: NAUKOVA DUMKA, 380.
  29. Prykhodko, O. A., Alekseyenko, S. V. (2014). Numerical simulation of the process of airfoil icing in the presence of large supercooled water drops. Technical Physics Letters, 40 (10), 864–867. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063785014100125
  30. Prikhod’ko, A. A., Alekseenko, S. V. (2014). Numerical Simulation of the Processes of Icing on Airfoils with Formation of a “Barrier” Ice. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics, 87 (3), 598–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-014-1050-0
  31. Alekseyenko, S., Dreus, A., Dron, M., Brazaluk, O. (2022). Numerical Study of Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Pointed Plate of Variable Elongation in Subsonic and Supersonic Gas Flow. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 96 (2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.37934/arfmts.96.2.8897
  32. Gutiérrez, R., Llorente, E., Ragni, D., Aranguren, P. (2022). Study on k−ω−Shear Stress Transport Corrections Applied to Airfoil Leading-Edge Roughness Under RANS Framework. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 144 (4). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052925
  33. Adanta, D., Fattah, I. M. R., Muhammad, N. M. (2020). Comparison of standard k-epsilon and SST k-omega turbulence model for breastshot waterwheel simulation. Journal of Mechanical Science and Engineering, 7 (2), 039–044. https://doi.org/10.36706/jmse.v7i2.44
  34. Costa, L. M. F., Montiel, J. E. S., Corrêa, L., Lofrano, F. C., Nakao, O. S., Kurokawa, F. A. (2022). Influence of standard k-ε, SST κ-ω and LES turbulence models on the numerical assessment of a suspension bridge deck aerodynamic behavior. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 44 (8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-022-03653-1
  35. Maurício Araújo, A., Antônio Coutinho Silva, A., Leal dos Santos, C., Corte Real Fernandes, E., Menezes, E., José Arruda Moura Rocha, G. et al. (2017). An assessment of different turbulence models on a CFD simulation of air flow past a S814 airfoil. Procceedings of the 24th ABCM International Congress of Mechanicl Engineering. https://doi.org/10.26678/abcm.cobem2017.cob17-0306
  36. Robinson, D., Hassan, H. (1996). A two-equation turbulence closure model for wall bounded and free shear flows. Fluid Dynamics Conference. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1996-2057
  37. Petrov, K. P. (1998). Aerodinamika tel prosteyshih form. Moscow: Fizmatlit, 428.
  38. Meng, Y., Yan, L., Huang, W., Tong, X. (2020). Numerical Investigation of the Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Missile. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 887 (1), 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/887/1/012001
  39. Bayley, D. J., Hartfield, R. J., Burkhalter, J. E., Jenkins, R. M. (2008). Design Optimization of a Space Launch Vehicle Using a Genetic Algorithm. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 45 (4), 733–740. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.35318
Assessing the possibility of using a variable-length launch vehicle with a polymer body for orbiting payload

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Golubek, A., Aleksieienko, S., Dron, M., & Dreus, A. (2024). Assessing the possibility of using a variable-length launch vehicle with a polymer body for orbiting payload. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(7 (129), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.306225

Issue

Section

Applied mechanics