Identification of crack width behavior of one-way reinforced concrete slab structure at different steel reinforcement area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.309874Keywords:
flexural member, crack width, one-way slab, reinforced concrete, steel areaAbstract
An evaluation study of crack limit states based on design codes and prior research is presented in this publication. Its main goal is to connect research findings to common design codes. Researchers continue to face a difficult dilemma when it comes to reinforced concrete structure fractures, particularly in one-way slab constructions where there is still significant damage and corrosion in the reinforcement because of cracks. Practitioners will find it easier to construct these structures and solve the slab durability issue if the proper formula is discovered. One can overcome reinforced concrete. A method for estimating the maximum fracture width formula in one-way reinforced concrete slabs with varying steel areas is suggested based on this research. Slabs use a variety of steel areas, including 1000 mm2, 1200 mm2, and 1400 mm2.The test specimens are the same length of 2 meters and have a slab width of 0.6 meters with steel reinforcement. Findings from a literature review of research codes and prediction formulas from earlier studies, namely wmax(prop)=1.5*10-2fsAs-0.4, indicate that the maximum crack width is not significantly influenced by steel area (As). Overall, the findings from the two methods used in this analysis match the suggested formula and the observed experimental testing. This data indicates that the maximum fracture width has been greatly lowered by increasing the steel Area (As) of the reinforced concrete slab, leading to the determination of the experimental formula, As a result, a unique approximation formula has been developed to assess the impact of steel area parameters for pure slabs on the maximum crack width formula for one-way reinforced concrete slabs. This crack width formula is only applicable to one-way slabs in practice.
Supporting Agency
- Thank you to LPPM Universitas Brawijaya for providing all support, thus assisting the completion of this research.
References
- Kanavaris, F., Coelho, M., Ferreira, N., Azenha, M., Andrade, C. (2023). A review on the effects of cracking and crack width on corrosion of reinforcement in concrete. Structural Concrete, 24 (6), 7272–7294. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202300227
- Kridaningrat, B. B. B., Soehardjono, A., Wisnumurti, W., Nuralinah, D. (2024). Identifying the effect of thickness on crack width in one-way reinforced concrete slab structures. Applied Mechanics, 2 (7 (128)), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.302795
- Pérez Caldentey, A., García, R., Gribniak, V., Rimkus, A. (2020). Tension versus flexure: Reasons to modify the formulation of MC 2010 for cracking. Structural Concrete, 21(5), 2101–2123. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202000279
- Tue, N. V., Fehling, E., Schlicke, D., Krenn, C. (2021). Crack width verification and minimum reinforcement according to EC 2: Current model with specifications in Germany and Austria vs proposal for revision. Civil Engineering Design, 3 (5-6), 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/cend.202100045
- Gribniak, V., Pérez Caldentey, A., Kaklauskas, G., Rimkus, A., Sokolov, A. (2016). Effect of arrangement of tensile reinforcement on flexural stiffness and cracking. Engineering Structures, 124, 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.026
- Naotunna, C. N., Samarakoon, S. M. S. M. K., Fosså, K. T. (2021). Experimental investigation of crack width variation along the concrete cover depth in reinforced concrete specimens with ribbed bars and smooth bars. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 15, e00593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00593
- Soehardjono, A., Wibowo, A., Nuralinah, D., Aditya, C. (2023). Identifying the influence of reinforcement ratio on crack behaviour of rigid pavement. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (7 (125)), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.290035
- De Maio, U., Greco, F., Leonetti, L., Nevone Blasi, P., Pranno, A. (2022). A cohesive fracture model for predicting crack spacing and crack width in reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Failure Analysis, 139, 106452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106452
- Lapi, M., Orlando, M., Spinelli, P. (2018). A review of literature and code formulations for cracking in R/C members. Structural Concrete, 19 (5), 1481–1503. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201700248
- Kaklauskas, G., Sokolov, A. (2021). Crack Analysis of Tensile and Bending RC Members. Proceedings of the 3rd RILEM Spring Convention and Conference (RSCC2020), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76547-7_21
- Naotunna, C. N., Samarakoon, S. M. K., Fosså, K. T. (2020). Experimental and theoretical behavior of crack spacing of specimens subjected to axial tension and bending. Structural Concrete, 22 (2), 775–792. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900587
- Gribniak, V., Rimkus, A., Pérez Caldentey, A., Sokolov, A. (2020). Cracking of concrete prisms reinforced with multiple bars in tension–the cover effect. Engineering Structures, 220, 110979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110979
- Basteskår, M., Engen, M., Kanstad, T., Fosså, K. T. (2019). A review of literature and code requirements for the crack width limitations for design of concrete structures in serviceability limit states. Structural Concrete, 20 (2), 678–688. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201800183
- Goszczyńska, B., Trąmpczyński, W., Tworzewska, J. (2021). Analysis of Crack Width Development in Reinforced Concrete Beams. Materials, 14 (11), 3043. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14113043
- Soehardjono, A., Aditya, C. (2021). Analysis of the effect of slab thickness on crack width in rigid pavement slabs. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, 2, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2021.001693
- Suseno, H., Soehardjono, A., Wardana, I. N. G., Rachmansyah, A. (2018). Performance of lightweight concrete one-way slabs using medium-K basaltic andesite pumice and scoria. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 19 (4), 473–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-018-0047-y
- Ikehata, S., Ishiguro, H., Nakano, T., Nakamura, H. (2020). Experimental evaluation of punching shear capacity of reinforced concrete slabs with horizontal crack due to compression rebar corrosion. Structural Concrete, 21 (3), 890–904. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900438
- Chang, S., Yang, M., Sun, Y., Liu, K. (2019). Calculation Method of Early-Age Crack Width in Reinforced Concrete Bridge through a Nonlinear FEA Model. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 23 (7), 3088–3096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-2129-0
- Sheikhnasiri, A. (2024). Comparative Study of Numerical Methods for Predicting Crack Propagation in Reinforced Concrete Hollow Core Slabs. Journal of Civil Engineering Researchers, 6 (1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.61186/jcer.6.1.42
- -05/318R-05: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary.
- AS 3600. Concrete structures (2009). Austrailan Standard.
- Standard specifications for concrete structures-2007, design (2007). Tokyo: Japan Society of Civil Engineers. JSCE Guidelines for Concrete No. 15. Available at: https://www.jsce-int.org/system/files/JGC15_Standard_Specifications_Design_1.0.pdf
- Walraven, J. C., van der Horst, A. Q. C. (2013). FIB model code for concrete structures 2010. International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib).
- EN 1992-1-1 (2004) (English): Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures - Part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings [Authority: The European Union Per Regulation 305/2011, Directive 98/34/EC, Directive 2004/18/EC]. Available at: https://www.phd.eng.br/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/en.1992.1.1.2004.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Wisnumurti Wisnumurti, Bhondana Bayu Brahmana Kridaningrat, Agoes Soehardjono, Devi Nuralinah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.