A mechanized assembly for erecting soil-cement barriers to protect agricultural lands from low-active waste during flood

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.313044

Keywords:

low-level radioactive waste, soil-cement, mechanized assembly, waterproof engineering barriers, immobilization

Abstract

The object of this study is the process of constructing a waterproof underground barrier from local soil using loess loam and medium-sized sand as an example. The values of waterproofing of soil cements on different types of soil and the norms of net labor consumption corresponding to them were obtained. The research solves the task of protecting agricultural lands in the areas of geological burials of low-level radioactive waste.

Configuration of a mechanized drilling mixing assembly for installing a waterproof barrier in the field has been proposed. Waterproofness of soil cement on clay and sandy soils was determined experimentally. The corresponding norms of the net consumption of time for manufacturing the barrier in these soils have been determined.

Units of the mechanized assembly are repairable, utilize widely available materials, parts, and mechanisms. As a result of studies on the labor intensity of the installation of soil cement, a net labor rate was established, which varies from 35 to 52 min/m3 depending on the type of soil. The corresponding values of waterproofness, which ranged from W6 to W14, were determined, which substantiates the possibility of effective functioning of soil-cement underground barriers. Options for the structural solution for impenetrable barriers have been offered. The values of the obtained net time rates are explained by the high degree of mechanization of the technological process and the use of local materials.

A distinctive feature of the results is the emphasis on the data collection on the time consumption of machines and mechanisms, the characteristics of local soils under production conditions, and the use of local materials. The assembly implies using affordable and repairable units that can be serviced right in the field. Given this, the manufacturability of the proposed process was defined, confirmed by time-keeping studies.

The realm of practical application of the reported results are sites within flat areas with sandy or loess bases. Barrier solutions are designed exclusively for geological waste storage facilities under the conditions of a high level of groundwater and the presence of a waterproof layer at the base

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Petrash, Poltava State Agrarian University

PhD

Department of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering

Vasyl Zotsenko, "FUNDAMENT BUD-3" LTD

Director

Ruslan Petrash, Poltava State Agrarian University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Construction and Vocational Education

Nataliia Popovych, Poltava State Agrarian University

PhD

Department of Construction and Vocational Education

Ilona Rozhko, Poltava State Agrarian University

PhD

Department of Breeding, Seed Production and Genetics

Karyna Danova, O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Occupational and Life Safety

Viktoriia Malysheva, O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv

PhD

Department of Occupational and Life Safety

Olha Nikitchenko, O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv

PhD

Department of Occupational and Life Safety

Mykola Moroz, O.M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv

PhD

Department of Occupational and Life Safety

Oleg Bogatov, Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University

PhD

Department of Metrology and Life Safety

References

  1. Hosan, Md. I. (2017). Radioactive Waste Classification, Management and Environment. Engineering International, 5 (2), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.18034/ei.v5i2.178
  2. Natarajan, V., Karunanidhi, M., Raja, B. (2020). A critical review on radioactive waste management through biological techniques. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27 (24), 29812–29823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08404-0
  3. Mir, B. A. (2017). Some Studies on Mechanical Behaviour of Cement Stabilized Dredged Soil from Flood Spill Channel of Jhelum River Srinagar. Contemporary Issues in Geoenvironmental Engineering, 386–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61612-4_32
  4. Hietala, M., Geysmans, R. (2020). Social sciences and radioactive waste management: acceptance, acceptability, and a persisting socio-technical divide. Journal of Risk Research, 25 (4), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1864010
  5. Al Nuaimi, A. H., Williams, L. G. (2022). Radioactive waste management in the UAE: Proposal for an inventory management system. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 146, 104140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104140
  6. Beaven, R. P., Stringfellow, A. M., Nicholls, R. J., Haigh, I. D., Kebede, A. S., Watts, J. (2020). Future challenges of coastal landfills exacerbated by sea level rise. Waste Management, 105, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.01.027
  7. Gupta, A., Arora, V. K., Biswas, S. (2017). Contaminated dredged soil stabilization using cement and bottom ash for use as highway subgrade fill. International Journal of Geo-Engineering, 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40703-017-0057-8
  8. Chen, Z., Feng, Q., Yue, R., Chen, Z., Moselhi, O., Soliman, A. et al. (2022). Construction, renovation, and demolition waste in landfill: a review of waste characteristics, environmental impacts, and mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (31), 46509–46526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20479-5
  9. Zotsenko, M. L., Petrash, S. S., Petrash, R. V., Petrash, O. V., Popovych, N. M. (2016). Normatyvni doslidzhennia burozmishuvalnoi tekhnolohiyi vyhotovlennia gruntotsementnykh pal. Naukovyi visnyk budivnytstva, 84 (2), 219–223. Available at: https://svc.kname.edu.ua/index.php/svc/article/view/1233
  10. Zotsenko, M. L., Mykhailovska, O. V., Sivitska, S. P. (2020). Construction Features Durable Storage of Toxic Waste in Boreholes. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Building Innovations, 325–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42939-3_33
  11. Stempkowska, A., Wójcik, Ł., Ostrowski, K. A., Gawenda, T. (2022). Low-Energy Clay–Cement Slurries Find Application as Waterproofing Membranes for Limiting the Migration of Contaminants—Case Studies in Poland. Energies, 16 (1), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16010230
  12. Du, X., Wu, Q., Ma, Q., Tian, Y., Zhang, J. (2023). Study on Strengthening and Waterproofing Mechanism of Calcium Lignosulfonate in Silty Soil Sites. Coatings, 13 (8), 1402. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13081402
  13. Wang, M., Yang, X., Zheng, K., Chen, R. (2024). Properties and Microstructure of a Cement-Based Capillary Crystalline Waterproofing Grouting Material. Buildings, 14 (5), 1439. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14051439
  14. Brasse, K., Tracz, T., Zdeb, T., Rychlewski, P. (2018). Influence of Soil-Cement Composition on its Selected Properties. MATEC Web of Conferences, 163, 06006. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201816306006
  15. Karpisz, I., Pyda, J., Cichy, L., Sobala, D. (2018). Study of the effect of cement amount on the soil-cement sample strength. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 365, 042061. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/365/4/042061
  16. Zotcenko, M. L., Petrash, S. S., Petrash, R. V., Petrash, O. V. (2015). Normative observations of deep soil mixing technology of soil-cement piles manufacturing. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats. Seriya: Haluzeve mashynobuduvannia, budivnytstvo, 3 (45), 212–217. Available at: https://reposit.nupp.edu.ua/handle/PoltNTU/5015
A mechanized assembly for erecting soil-cement barriers to protect agricultural lands from low-active waste during flood

Downloads

Published

2024-10-25

How to Cite

Petrash, O., Zotsenko, V., Petrash, R., Popovych, N., Rozhko, I., Danova, K., Malysheva, V., Nikitchenko, O., Moroz, M., & Bogatov, O. (2024). A mechanized assembly for erecting soil-cement barriers to protect agricultural lands from low-active waste during flood. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(10 (131), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.313044