Comparison of deep learning-based models for detection of diseased trees using an image compression algorithm

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.314148

Keywords:

YOLO model, image compression, computer vision, forest management, deep learning

Abstract

The object of the research is the application of deep learning algorithms using an improved mathematical lossless image compression method for recognizing and identifying dead trees in aerospace images.

The main problem that has been solved is the archiving of images due to their large volume on disk and the possibility of their further processing by deep learning methods such as convolutional and capsule neural networks, which have shown high efficiency and accuracy in image recognition and classification tasks using the proposed new image compression method.

The article presents a comparative analysis of the performance of three YOLO (You Only Look Once) models with different types of architectures, such as YOLOv5, YOLOv7 and YOLOv8, to assess the effectiveness of their work for the task of recognizing aerospace tree images obtained from satellites, drones, and aircrafts.

Comprehensive analysis of YOLO models presents that model YOLO v8 turned out to be most effective with a positive accuracy of 88.2 %, a recall of 77.4 %, and a mAP50 score of 87.2 %. Moreover, the average detection time was only 0.052 seconds for each image, even though the model size remains very small – 21.5 MB. These results suggest a much better usage of time and precise identification of dead trees, and classified targets with high efficiency.

From the research, there is significant prospects of global forest management especially on forest reduction and protection of ecosystems through accurate assessment on the health of forestry. The proposed approach is universal and can be used in real life conditions, providing a good compromise of the speed, accuracy and resources required for forest monitoring and management

Author Biographies

Assiya Sarinova, Astana IT University

PhD

Department of Intelligent Systems and Cybersecurity

Leila Rzayeva, Astana IT University

PhD

Department of Intelligent Systems and Cybersecurity

Gulnara Abitova, Astana IT University

PhD

Department of Intelligent Systems and Cybersecurity

Alimzhan Yessenov, Astana IT University

MSc

Department of Intelligent Systems and Cybersecurity

Ansar Sansyzbayev, Astana IT University

MSc

Department of Intelligent Systems and Cybersecurity

Yerassyl Omirtay, Astana IT University

MSc

Department of Intelligent Systems and Cybersecurity

References

  1. Kumar, S., Chaudhuri, S., Banerjee, B., Ali, F. (2019). Onboard Hyperspectral Image Compression Using Compressed Sensing and Deep Learning. Computer Vision – ECCV 2018 Workshops, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11012-3_3
  2. Wenbin, W., Wu, Y., Li, J. (2018). The Hyper-spectral Image Compression Based on K-Means Clustering and Parallel Prediction Algorithm*. MATEC Web of Conferences, 173, 03071. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817303071
  3. Samah, N. A. A., Noor, N. R. M., Bakar, E. A., Desa, M. K. M. (2020). CCSDS-MHC on Raspberry Pi for Lossless Hyperspectral Image Compression. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 943 (1), 012004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/943/1/012004
  4. Sarinova, A., Zamyatin, A. (2020). Hyperspectral regression lossless compression algorithm of aerospace images. E3S Web of Conferences, 149, 02003. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202014902003
  5. Xue, J., Zhao, Y., Liao, W., Chan, J. C.-W. (2019). Nonlocal Tensor Sparse Representation and Low-Rank Regularization for Hyperspectral Image Compressive Sensing Reconstruction. Remote Sensing, 11 (2), 193. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11020193
  6. Fu, W., Li, S., Fang, L., Benediktsson, J. A. (2017). Adaptive Spectral–Spatial Compression of Hyperspectral Image With Sparse Representation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55 (2), 671–682. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2016.2613848
  7. Lee, S., Lee, E., Choi, H., Lee, C. (2005). Compression of hyperspectral images with 2D wavelet transform using adjacent information and SPIHT algorithm. Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2005. IGARSS ’05., 1, 117–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2005.1526118
  8. Cheng, K.-J., Dill, J. C. (2014). An Improved EZW Hyperspectral Image Compression. Journal of Computer and Communications, 02 (02), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2014.22006
  9. Shen, H., Pan, W. D., Wu, D. (2017). Predictive Lossless Compression of Regions of Interest in Hyperspectral Images With No-Data Regions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55 (1), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2016.2603527
  10. Kefalas, N., Theodoridis, G. (2019). Low-memory and high-performance architectures for the CCSDS 122.0-B-1 compression standard. Integration, 69, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vlsi.2018.03.004
  11. Davidson, R. L., Bridges, C. P. (2017). GPU accelerated multispectral EO imagery optimised CCSDS-123 lossless compression implementation. 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero.2017.7943817
  12. Ruiz, L., Torres, M., Gómez, A., Díaz, S., González, J. M., Cavas, F. (2020). Detection and Classification of Aircraft Fixation Elements during Manufacturing Processes Using a Convolutional Neural Network. Applied Sciences, 10 (19), 6856. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196856
  13. Belwalkar, A., Nath, A., Dikshit, O. (2018). Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images using variational autoencoder and convolution neural network. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII–5, 613–620. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-5-613-2018
  14. Maggiori, E., Plaza, A., Tarabalka, Y. (2017). Models for Hyperspectral Image Analysis: From Unmixing to Object-Based Classification. Mathematical Models for Remote Sensing Image Processing, 37–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66330-2_2
  15. Pouyanfar, S., Sadiq, S., Yan, Y., Tian, H., Tao, Y., Reyes, M. P. et al. (2018). A Survey on Deep Learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 51 (5), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234150
  16. Wang, Z., Zhou, Y., Li, G. (2019). Anomaly detection for machinery by using Big Data Real-Time processing and clustering technique. Proceedings of the 2019 3rd International Conference on Big Data Research, 5, 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3372454.3372480
  17. Du, H., Zhang, W., Guan, N., Yi, W. (2019). Scope-aware data cache analysis for OpenMP programs on multi-core processors. Journal of Systems Architecture, 98, 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysarc.2019.04.001
  18. Balakrishnan, S., Langerman, D., Gretok, E., George, A. D. (2018). Deep Learning for Hyperspectral Image Classification on Embedded Platforms. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Applications and Systems (IPAS), 12, 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1109/ipas.2018.8708899
  19. Ball, J. E., Wei, P. (2018). Deep Learning Hyperspectral Image Classification using Multiple Class-Based Denoising Autoencoders, Mixed Pixel Training Augmentation, and Morphological Operations. IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 740, 6903–6906. https://doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2018.8519368
  20. Abramov, N., Ardentov, A., Emeljanova, Ju., Talalaev, A., Fralenko, V., Shishkin, O. (2015). The architecture of the system for spacecraft state monitoring and forecasting. Program Systems: Theory and Applications, 6 (2), 85–99. https://doi.org/10.25209/2079-3316-2015-6-2-85-99
  21. Ghamisi, P., Yokoya, N., Li, J., Liao, W., Liu, S., Plaza, J. et al. (2017). Advances in Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: A Comprehensive Overview of the State of the Art. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 5 (4), 37–78. https://doi.org/10.1109/mgrs.2017.2762087
  22. Lu, B., Dao, P., Liu, J., He, Y., Shang, J. (2020). Recent Advances of Hyperspectral Imaging Technology and Applications in Agriculture. Remote Sensing, 12 (16), 2659. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12162659
  23. Sarinova, A., Rzayeva, L., Tendikov, N., Shayea, I. (2023). Simple Implementation of Terrain Classification Models via Fully Convolutional Neural Networks. 2023 10th International Conference on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM), 10, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/wincom59760.2023.10323012
  24. Sarinova, A., Dunayev, P., Bekbayeva, A., Mekhtiyev, A., Sarsikeyev, Y. (2022). Development of compression algorithms for hyperspectral aerospace images based on discrete orthogonal transformations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (2 (115)), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.251404
  25. Sarinova, A., Neftissov, A., Rzayeva, L., Yessenov, A., Kirichenko, L., Kazambayev, I. (2024). Development of an algorithm for compressing aerospace images for the subsequent recognition and identification of various objects. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (2 (129)), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.306973
Comparison of deep learning-based models for detection of diseased trees using an image compression algorithm

Downloads

Published

2024-10-30

How to Cite

Sarinova, A., Rzayeva, L., Abitova, G., Yessenov, A., Sansyzbayev, A., & Omirtay, Y. (2024). Comparison of deep learning-based models for detection of diseased trees using an image compression algorithm. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(2 (131), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.314148