Revealing the causes of delays at transit points along an intermodal grain supply chain

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.338166

Keywords:

agent simulation, intermodal transportation, excess cargo mass, optimal working fleet

Abstract

This study’s object is the transport and technological system of grain supply along international routes. The issue considered is the emergence of excess cargo weight at the junctions of various types of transport.

The study was conducted on the basis of a constructed simulation model built according to the agent and discrete-event principles. It covers both the maximum transportation volumes in one of the Ukraine’s oblasts in 2021 (880 thousand tons) and the forecasted indicators (1–1.5 million tons per year).

The application of the model has made it possible to determine the optimal parameters for the fleet of vehicles in a supply chain, guided by the system criterion – minimization of the average delivery time of one ton of grain. It was established that for transporting 1 million tons of grain per year, the optimal composition of the transport fleet should include 92 trucks and four railroad routes.

Patterns in the formation of excess cargo weight depending on the estimated composition of vehicles were also determined. With a planned transportation intensity of 1 million tons per year, reducing the number of trucks by 12 units could lead to the accumulation of 237 thousand tons of cargo mass at transit points. Reducing the number of railroad routes by one unit would lead to the accumulation of 544 thousand tons of cargo mass, which corresponds to USD 106 million.

The proposed model makes it possible to assess the consequences of delays in delivery, as well as the formation of excess cargo mass at transit logistics terminals and grain elevators

Author Biographies

Yurii Khomenko, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies

PhD Student

Department of Transport Service and Logistics

Andrii Okorokov, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Transport Service and Logistics

Viacheslav Matsiuk, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Technical Sciences

Department of Transport Technologies and Means of Agro-Industrial Complex

Iryna Zhuravel, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Transport Service and Logistics

Olena Pavlenko, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

Department of Transport Service and Logistics

References

  1. Namazov, M., Matsiuk, V., Bulgakova, I., Nikolaienko, I., Vernyhora, R. (2023). Agent-based simulation model of multimodal iron ore concentrate transportation. Naukovij Žurnal «Tehnìka Ta Energetika», 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.31548/machinery/1.2023.46
  2. Zhang, T., Feng, Q. (2024). Multidimensional Risk Assessment of China’s Grain Supply Chain with Entropy Weight TOPSIS Method. Procedia Computer Science, 242, 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.08.213
  3. Anufriyeva, T., Matsiuk, V., Shramenko, N., Ilchenko, N., Pryimuk, O., Lebid, V. (2023). Construction of a simulation model for the transportation of perishable goods along variable routes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (4 (122)), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.277948
  4. Matsiuk, V., Galan, O., Prokhorchenko, A., Tverdomed, V. (2021). An Agent-Based Simulation for Optimizing the Parameters of a Railway Transport System. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications. Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer. Volume I: Main Conference, PhD Symposium, and Posters. Available at: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3013/20210121.pdf
  5. Samsonkin, V., Goretskyi, O., Matsiuk, V., Myronenko, V., Boynik, A., Merkulov, V. (2019). Development of an approach for operative control over railway transport technological safety based on the identification of risks in the indicators of its operation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (3 (102)), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.184162
  6. Alam, M. F. B., Tushar, S. R., Ahmed, T., Karmaker, C. L., Bari, A. B. M. M., de Jesus Pacheco, D. A. et al. (2024). Analysis of the enablers to deal with the ripple effect in food grain supply chains under disruption: Implications for food security and sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, 270, 109179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109179
  7. Ekleme, G., Yercan, F. (2025). Assessment of the Black Sea Grain Initiative: Crisis Management via Maritime Transportation. Transport Policy, 163, 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.12.011
  8. Orozonova, A., Gapurbaeva, S., Kydykov, A., Prokopenko, O., Prause, G., Lytvynenko, S. (2022). Application of smart logistics technologies in the organization of multimodal cargo delivery. Transportation Research Procedia, 63, 1192–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2022.06.124
  9. Zagurskiy, O., Savchenko, L., Makhmudov, I., Matsiuk, V. (2022). Assessment of socio-ecological efficiency of transport and logistics activity. 21st International Scientific Conference Engineering for Rural Development Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.22616/erdev.2022.21.tf182
  10. Lv, B., Yang, B., Zhu, X., Li, J. (2019). Operational optimization of transit consolidation in multimodal transport. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 129, 454–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.02.001
  11. Owens, T. D., Seedah, D. P. K., Harrison, R. (2013). Modeling Rail Operating Costs for Multimodal Corridor Planning. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2374 (1), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.3141/2374-11
  12. Rahmani, S., Park, T.-H., Dishman, A. F., Lahann, J. (2013). Multimodal delivery of irinotecan from microparticles with two distinct compartments. Journal of Controlled Release, 172 (1), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2013.08.017
  13. Butko, T., Prokhorchenko, A., Golovko, T., Prokhorchenko, G. (2018). Development of the method for modeling the propagation of delays in non­cyclic train scheduling on the railroads with mixed traffic. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (91)), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.123141
  14. de Faria, C. H. F., Almeida, J. F. F., Pinto, L. R. (2024). Simulation–optimisation approach for sustainable planning of intermodal logistics in the Brazilian grain export industry. Decision Analytics Journal, 10, 100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100388
  15. Turpak, S., Gritsay, S., Ostroglyad, E. (2014). Development of micrologistics system of delivery of finished products of metallurgical enterprises by rail transport. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (3 (71)), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.28033
  16. Pavlenko, O., Shramenko, N., Muzylyov, D. (2020). Logistics Optimization of Agricultural Products Supply to the European Union Based on Modeling by Petri Nets. New Technologies, Development and Application III, 596–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46817-0_69
  17. Muzylyov, D., Shramenko, N. (2020). Mathematical Model of Reverse Loading Advisability for Trucks Considering Idle Times. New Technologies, Development and Application III, 612–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46817-0_71
  18. Khomenko, Y., Matsiuk, V., Okorokov, A., Gorobchenko, O. (2024). Development of a simulation model of grain delivery in global supply chains. Scientific Reports of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 20 (5), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.31548/dopovidi/5.2024.21
  19. Holmgren, J., Davidsson, P., Persson, J. A., Ramstedt, L. (2012). TAPAS: A multi-agent-based model for simulation of transport chains. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 23, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2011.12.011
  20. González-Cancelas, N., Vaca-Cabrero, J., Camarero-Orive, A. (2025). Multi-Agent System for Smart Roll-on/Roll-off Terminal Management: Orchestration and Communication Strategies for AI-Driven Optimization. Applied Sciences, 15 (11), 6079. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15116079
  21. Matsiuk, V., Ilchenko, N., Pryimuk, O., Kochubei, D., Prokhorchenko, A. (2022). Risk assessment of transport processes by agent-based simulation. AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0105913
  22. Archetti, C., Peirano, L., Speranza, M. G. (2022). Optimization in multimodal freight transportation problems: A Survey. European Journal of Operational Research, 299 (1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.07.031
  23. Medvediev, I., Muzylyov, D., Montewka, J. (2024). A model for agribusiness supply chain risk management using fuzzy logic. Case study: Grain route from Ukraine to Poland. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 190, 103691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103691
  24. Maiyar, L. M., Thakkar, J. J. (2019). Modelling and analysis of intermodal food grain transportation under hub disruption towards sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics, 217, 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.021
Revealing the causes of delays at transit points along an intermodal grain supply chain

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30

How to Cite

Khomenko, Y., Okorokov, A., Matsiuk, V., Zhuravel, I., & Pavlenko, O. (2025). Revealing the causes of delays at transit points along an intermodal grain supply chain. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(3 (136), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.338166

Issue

Section

Control processes