Improving the efficiency of greenhouse control by using a Markov decision-making process model

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.338565

Keywords:

greenhouse microclimate, two-level optimization, stochastic Markov decision-making process, precision agriculture, control problem

Abstract

The object of this paper is the process of greenhouse control. The study solves the task of rational greenhouse control based on the Markov decision-making process taking into account two-level optimization. A random Markov decision-making process has been defined for the problem of greenhouse operation improvement.

A greenhouse control model was built, which makes it possible to determine rational microclimate parameters to grow agricultural crops. To validate the greenhouse control model, real data from an experiment on growing strawberries in a greenhouse complex were used.

Observations lasted from May 17 to June 8, 2025. Monitoring of microclimate parameters was carried out around the clock with an interval of 1 minute, which ensured high accuracy of the analysis. The experimental scenario included three irrigation circuits, a heating system, LED lighting, ventilation, and CO2 monitoring.

The proposed approach to greenhouse management based on the Markov decision-making process model demonstrates high practical value, especially in the context of growing sensitive crops such as strawberries. The simulation shows that the implementation of two-level optimization in autonomous greenhouse control systems could provide an increase in yield by 10.15%. At the same time, due to the significant volume of the greenhouse and the high thermal inertia of the structures, the actual values of the microclimate parameters deviate from the rational ones by 10–15%, as a result of which the calculated yield increase for the model built is about 7%.

Author Biographies

Andrii Biloshchytskyi, Astana IT University; Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Vice-Rector of the Science and Innovation

Department of Information Technology

Yurii Andrashko, Uzhhorod National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of System Analysis and Optimization Theory

Oleksandr Kuchanskyi, Astana IT University; Uzhhorod National University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Computational and Data Science

Department of Informative and Operating Systems and Technologies

Alexandr Neftissov, Astana IT University; Academy of Physical Education and Mass Sports

PhD, Associate Professor

Research and Innovation Center "Industry 4.0"

Myroslava Gladka, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv; National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Information Systems and Technologies

Department of Biomedical Cybernetics

Volodymyr Vatskel, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture

Senior Lecturer

Department of Information Technology

Sofiia Berdei, Refugee & Immigrant Services Northwest

Senior Specialist

References

  1. Sulser, T., Wiebe, K. D., Dunston, S., Cenacchi, N., Nin-Pratt, A., Mason-D’Croz, D. et al. (2021). Climate Change and hunger: Estimating costs of adaptation in the agrifood system. International Food Policy Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896294165
  2. Kazakhstan. Climate Change Knowledge Portal. Available at: https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org/country/kazakhstan/climate-data-historical
  3. Visser, S., Keesstra, S., Maas, G., de Cleen, M., Molenaar, C. (2019). Soil as a Basis to Create Enabling Conditions for Transitions Towards Sustainable Land Management as a Key to Achieve the SDGs by 2030. Sustainability, 11 (23), 6792. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236792
  4. Muhie, S. H. (2022). Novel approaches and practices to sustainable agriculture. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 10, 100446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100446
  5. Okolie, C. C., Danso-Abbeam, G., Groupson-Paul, O., Ogundeji, A. A. (2022). Climate-Smart Agriculture Amidst Climate Change to Enhance Agricultural Production: A Bibliometric Analysis. Land, 12 (1), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12010050
  6. Kazancoglu, Y., Lafci, C., Kumar, A., Luthra, S., Garza‐Reyes, J. A., Berberoglu, Y. (2023). The role of agri‐food 4.0 in climate‐smart farming for controlling climate change‐related risks: A business perspective analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33 (4), 2788–2802. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3629
  7. Zhang, N., Wang, M., Wang, N. (2002). Precision agriculture – a worldwide overview. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 36 (2-3), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-1699(02)00096-0
  8. Loures, L., Chamizo, A., Ferreira, P., Loures, A., Castanho, R., Panagopoulos, T. (2020). Assessing the Effectiveness of Precision Agriculture Management Systems in Mediterranean Small Farms. Sustainability, 12 (9), 3765. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093765
  9. Sparks, B. D. (2018). What Is the Current State of Labor in the Greenhouse Industry? Available at: https://www.greenhousegrower.com/management/what-is-the-current-state-of-labor-in-the-greenhouse-industry/
  10. Cao, X., Yao, Y., Li, L., Zhang, W., An, Z., Zhang, Z. et al. (2022). iGrow: A Smart Agriculture Solution to Autonomous Greenhouse Control. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 36 (11), 11837–11845. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i11.21440
  11. Badji, A., Benseddik, A., Bensaha, H., Boukhelifa, A., Hasrane, I. (2022). Design, technology, and management of greenhouse: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 373, 133753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133753
  12. Choab, N., Allouhi, A., El Maakoul, A., Kousksou, T., Saadeddine, S., Jamil, A. (2019). Review on greenhouse microclimate and application: Design parameters, thermal modeling and simulation, climate controlling technologies. Solar Energy, 191, 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.042
  13. Voogt, J., van Weel, P. (2008). Climate control based on stomatal behavior in a semi-closed greenhouse system “Aircokas.” Acta Horticulturae, 797, 151–156. https://doi.org/10.17660/actahortic.2008.797.19
  14. Robles Algarín, C., Callejas Cabarcas, J., Polo Llanos, A. (2017). Low-Cost Fuzzy Logic Control for Greenhouse Environments with Web Monitoring. Electronics, 6 (4), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics6040071
  15. Noma, F., Babu, S. (2024). Predicting climate smart agriculture (CSA) practices using machine learning: A prime exploratory survey. Climate Services, 34, 100484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2024.100484
  16. Jones, J. W., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C. H., Boote, K. J., Batchelor, W. D., Hunt, L. A. et al. (2003). The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy, 18 (3-4), 235–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00107-7
  17. Mekala, M. S., Viswanathan, P. (2017). A Survey: Smart agriculture IoT with cloud computing. 2017 International Conference on Microelectronic Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICMDCS), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/icmdcs.2017.8211551
  18. van Beveren, P. J. M., Bontsema, J., van Straten, G., van Henten, E. J. (2015). Optimal control of greenhouse climate using minimal energy and grower defined bounds. Applied Energy, 159, 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.012
  19. Parameswaran, G., Sivaprasath, K. (2016). Arduino based smart drip irrigation system using Internet of Things. International Journal of Engineering Science and Computing, 6 (5), 5518–5521.
  20. Platero-Horcajadas, M., Pardo-Pina, S., Cámara-Zapata, J.-M., Brenes-Carranza, J.-A., Ferrández-Pastor, F.-J. (2024). Enhancing Greenhouse Efficiency: Integrating IoT and Reinforcement Learning for Optimized Climate Control. Sensors, 24 (24), 8109. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24248109
  21. Vatskel, V., Kuchanskyi, O., Andrashko, Y. (2025). Strawberry Greenhouse Environmental Control Dataset. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16268298
  22. Cordwell, S. (2015). Markov Decision Process (MDP) Toolbox for Python. GitHub. Available at: https://github.com/sawcordwell/pymdptoolbox
  23. Nguyen, N. M., Tran, H. T., Duong, M. V., Bui, H., Tran, K. (2022). Differentiable physics-based greenhouse simulation. NeurIPS 2022 Workshop on Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences. Available at: https://ml4physicalsciences.github.io/2022/files/NeurIPS_ML4PS_2022_52.pdf
  24. Neftissov, A., Biloshchytskyi, A., Andrashko, Y., Vatskel, V., Toxanov, S., Gladka, M. (2024). Assessing the efficiency of using precision farming technology and remote monitoring of weather conditions in the activities of agricultural enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (13 (130)), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.309028
  25. Neftissov, A., Biloshchytskyi, A., Andrashko, Y., Kuchanskyi, O., Vatskel, V., Toxanov, S., Gladka, M. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of precision farming technologies in the activities of agricultural enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (13 (127)), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.298478
Improving the efficiency of greenhouse control by using a Markov decision-making process model

Downloads

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Biloshchytskyi, A., Andrashko, Y., Kuchanskyi, O., Neftissov, A., Gladka, M., Vatskel, V., & Berdei, S. (2025). Improving the efficiency of greenhouse control by using a Markov decision-making process model. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(2 (137), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.338565