Development of a validated computational fluid dynamics model for film cooling efficiency calculation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2026.356502

Keywords:

film cooling, cooling efficiency, flat plate, numerical modeling, turbulence model

Abstract

This study investigates the film cooling process on a flat plate. The task addressed relates to the identification of the most universal CFD model for different film cooling hole shapes.

The task has been solved by selecting an optimal computational mesh and determining the most suitable turbulence models for predicting film cooling effectiveness over a wide range of parameters. To investigate mesh‑independence effects, four levels of polyhedral computational grids were generated. It was shown that the mesh with 5.8 million elements, selected based on the mesh‑convergence analysis, performs nearly as well as a block‑structured mesh with identical settings.

A validated CFD model based on a polyhedral mesh was built. A distinctive feature of the results is that the CFD model covers 4 hole geometries spaced 5D apart and inclined at 30° to the mainstream flow (classical cylindrical, fan‑shaped, oval, and a diffused slot).

The results include a comparison of seven RANS turbulence models with experimental data. It was found that for the considered flow and geometric conditions, the most robust and generally applicable model is the kε Realizable turbulence model. Its advantages may be explained by its improved stability and better sensitivity to regions of complex flow kinematics, which enables more accurate prediction of expanding (fan‑shaped and diffuser‑type) holes.

Additionally, the model feasibility was verified for the 7-7-7 hole configuration. For this type of hole, a preliminary analysis of the influence of thermal barrier coating configurations on film cooling effectiveness is presented. The proposed computational model could be used for optimizing hole geometry and blowing conditions in gas turbine blade cooling applications

Author Biographies

Oleg Shevchuk, JSC Ivchenko-Progress

PhD Student, Lead Engineer

Department of Turbine

Oleksandr Tarasov, National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute"

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Turbine Construction

References

  1. Jauregui, R., Silv, F. (2011). Numerical Validation Methods. Numerical Analysis - Theory and Application. https://doi.org/10.5772/23304
  2. Shevchuk, O., Tarasov, O. (2025). Review of the Current State of Problem of Film Cooling for Gas Turbine Blades. NTU “KhPI” Bulletin: Power and Heat Engineering Processes and Equipment, 1, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.20998/2078-774x.2025.01.03
  3. Bunker, R. S. (2010). Film Cooling: Breaking the Limits of Diffusion Shaped Holes. Heat Transfer Research, 41 (6), 627–650. https://doi.org/10.1615/heattransres.v41.i6.40
  4. Shevchuk, O. V. (2025). Analysis of Modern Numerical Approaches to Film Cooling Simulation on a Flat Surface: Trends, Errors and Correlation Dependencies. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 28 (4), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.15407/pmach2025.04.011
  5. Chen, X., Li, J., Long, Y., Wang, Y., Weng, S., Yavuzkurt, S. (2020). A Conjugate Heat Transfer and Thermal Stress Analysis of Film-Cooled Superalloy With Thermal Barrier Coating. Volume 7B: Heat Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2020-16241
  6. Zamiri, A., You, S. J., Chung, J. T. (2020). Numerical Evaluation of Surface Roughness Effects on Film-Cooling Performance in a Laidback Fan-Shaped Hole. Volume 7B: Heat Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2020-14525
  7. Barigozzi, G., Zamiri, A., Brumana, G., Franchina, N., Chung, J. T. (2025). On the impact of Reynolds number on the performance of a trenched shaped hole. 16th European Conference on Turbomachinery Fluid Dynamics and Thermodynamics. https://doi.org/10.29008/etc2025-107
  8. Petelchic, V. Yu., Halatov, A. A., Pismenniy, D. N., Dashevskiy, Yu. Ya. (2013). Adaptation of SST turbulence model for a flat plate film cooling simulation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (12 (63)), 25–29. Available at: https://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/14874/
  9. Fischer, L., James, D., Jeyaseelan, S., Pfitzner, M. (2023). Optimizing the trench shaped film cooling design. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 214, 124399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124399
  10. Liu, C.-L., Zhu, H.-R., Bai, J.-T. (2008). Effect of turbulent Prandtl number on the computation of film-cooling effectiveness. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 51 (25-26), 6208–6218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.04.039
  11. Shih, T.-H., Liou, W. W., Shabbir, A., Yang, Z., Zhu, J. (1995). A new k-ϵ eddy viscosity model for high reynolds number turbulent flows. Computers & Fluids, 24(3), 227–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-t
  12. Menter, F. R. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32 (8), 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
  13. Diskin, B., Thomas, J. (2012). Effects of mesh regularity on accuracy of finite-volume schemes. 50th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-609
  14. Furgeson, M. T., Flachs, E. M., Bogard, D. G. (2025). Adjoint Optimization of Gas Turbine Film Cooling Geometry With Elevated Mainstream Mach Number. Volume 5: Energy Storage; Fans and Blowers; Heat Transfer: Combustors; Heat Transfer: Film Cooling. https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2025-154287
  15. Avcun, S., Erdem, E., Sal, S., Yasa, T. (2025). The Effect of Crossflow Velocity on the Film Cooling Effectiveness of Fan Shaped Holes. Volume 5: Energy Storage; Fans and Blowers; Heat Transfer: Combustors; Heat Transfer: Film Cooling. https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2025-154073
  16. Watanabe, K., Matsuura, M., Suenaga, K., Takeishi, K. I. (1999). An experimental study on the film cooling effectiveness with expanded hole geometry. Proceedings of the international gas turbine congress. Kobe, 615–622.
  17. Celik, I., Ghia, U., Roache, P., Freitas, C., Coleman, H., Raad, P. (2008) Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 130 (7), 078001. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2960953
  18. Pedersen, D. R., Eckert, E. R. G., Goldstein, R. J. (1977). Film Cooling With Large Density Differences Between the Mainstream and the Secondary Fluid Measured by the Heat-Mass Transfer Analogy. Journal of Heat Transfer, 99 (4), 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3450752
  19. Na, S., Shih, T. I.-P. (2006). Increasing Adiabatic Film-Cooling Effectiveness by Using an Upstream Ramp. Journal of Heat Transfer, 129 (4), 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2709965
  20. Hussain, S., Yan, X. (2020). Implementation of Hole-Pair in Ramp to Improve Film Cooling Effectiveness on a Plain Surface. Volume 7B: Heat Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2020-14838
  21. Rutledge, J. L., Polanka, M. D. (2014). Computational Fluid Dynamics Evaluations of Unconventional Film Cooling Scaling Parameters on a Simulated Turbine Blade Leading Edge. Journal of Turbomachinery, 136 (10). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028001
Development of a validated computational fluid dynamics model for film cooling efficiency calculation

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Shevchuk, O., & Tarasov, O. (2026). Development of a validated computational fluid dynamics model for film cooling efficiency calculation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(1 (140), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2026.356502

Issue

Section

Engineering technological systems