Need to consider damaging aseismic geodeformations when developing construction technologies

Authors

  • Игорь Леонидович Учитель Odessa State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture ul. Didrihsona 4, Odessa, Ukraine, 65029, Ukraine
  • Борис Борисович Капочкин Odessa State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture ul. Didrihsona 4, Odessa, Ukraine, 65029, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.37201

Keywords:

seismic hazard, Earth surface deformation, destruc¬tion of engineering structures, geodeformation monitoring

Abstract

As a result of the research, an attempt to justify the need to consider the risk of destruction of engineering structures by aseismic geodeformations depending on the type of building was made. An increase in the amplitude of the daily amplitudes of earth tidal defor­mations in the dates when syzygy coincides with zero declination of the Moon and the perihelion of the Moon was chosen as a criterion for selecting the activation period of global-scale geodeformations. The selected criterion corresponds to more than two-fold increase in the amplitude of geodeformations on these dates. As a result, anomalous dynamic and kinematic characteristics of the global geo­deformation process in April-May 2013, accompanied by a strong earthquake in the Sea of Okhotsk 05/25/2013 were investigated.

Using heterogeneous time series of improbable “resonance” emergencies, composed for the time period of April-May 2013 and including the cases of gas burst, sinkhole collapse, collapse of build­ings, underground mines, ditches, rupture of oil and gas pipelines, emergencies, related to bridges and railway accidents, as well as sta­tistical methods, it was shown that the global geodeformation process is statistically associated with different types of emergencies. It was shown that the time series of emergencies does not obey a normal distribution of random variables since it has a statistically significant periodic component. It was found that the frequency features of emergencies in the period under review are consistent with similar frequency features of dynamic factor of geodeformations. In a first approximation, it can be noted that emergencies, associated with sinkhole collapses and lithospheric gas bursts occur most frequently in the geodynamic activity period, deformation processes appear less often directly under the buildings and pipelines. Geodeformations for bridges and railways are the least dangerous. 

Author Biographies

Игорь Леонидович Учитель, Odessa State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture ul. Didrihsona 4, Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of heat and gas supply 

Борис Борисович Капочкин, Odessa State Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture ul. Didrihsona 4, Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

Candidate of Geological and Mineralogical Sciences

Department heat and gas supply 

References

  1. Uchytel,I., Kapochkin, B. (2014). Changing the paradigm of modern geodynamics and seismotectonics. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 80.
  2. Voytenko, S. P., Kapochkin, B. B., Uchitel, I. L., Yaroshenko, V. N. (2007). Geodynamics fundamentals of kinematic geodesy, Odessa: Astroprint Publisher, 264. [in Russian]
  3. Uchitel, I. L., Dorofeev, V. S., Yaroshenko, V. N., Kapochkin, B. B. (2008). Geodynamics. Fundamentals of dynamic geodesy. Odessa: Astroprint Publisher, 311. [in Russian].
  4. Uchytel, I. L., Yaroshenko, V. N., Kapochkin, B. B. (2011). Scientific priority of discovery of a natural phenomenon aseismic geodeformation and risks of this phenomenon on the territory of Ukraine. Control Systems Environmental. MHI NASU. Sevastopol, 82–84.
  5. Sashurin, A. D., Kashkarov, A. A., Kopyrin, V. V. (1998). Geophysical studies of the crust in the evaluation section of the pipeline accidents Krasnoturyinsk. Mining Geophysics. International Conference. St. Petersburg, Russia. SPb .: VNIMI,. 329–333.
  6. Panzhin, A. A. (1999). GPS-technology in the geodetic monitoring VAT technogenic area. Geomechanics in the mining industry: Proceedings of the / IGD UB RAS. Ekaterinburg, 68–85.
  7. Panzhin, A. A., Golubko, B. P. (2000). Application of satellite systems in the mining industry. Proceedings of the Ural State Mining and Geological Academy. Ser. Mining, 11, 183–195.
  8. Obara, K. (2002). Nonvolcanic Deep Tremor Associated with Subduction in Southwest Japan. Science, 296 (5573), 1679–1681. doi:10.1126/science.1070378
  9. Kawasaki, I., Asai, Y., Tamura, Y., Sagiya, T., Mikami, N., Okada, Y., Sakata, M., Kasahara, M. (1995). The 1992 Sanriku-Oki, Japan, Ultra-Slow Earthquake. Journal of Physics of the Earth, 43 (2), 105–116. doi:10.4294/jpe1952.43.105
  10. Kaninth, K., Muler H., Seemuller V. (2002). Displasement of the space geodetic observatory Areqipa due to resent earthquakes. Z. Geod. Geoinf. Und landmag, 27 (4), 238–243.
  11. Barkin, Yu., Shuanggen, J. (2006). Kinematics and dynamics of the Earth hemispheres. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 8, 01680.
  12. Barkin, Yu., Ferrandiz, J., Garcia, M. (2006). Sources of the Earth elastic energy and its seismicity. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 8, 01685.
  13. Barkin, Yu. (2006). Core polar motions and variations of the Earth figure. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 8, 02297.
  14. Barkin, Yu. (2006). Core polar motion and inversion gravity variations of the Earth. Geophysical Research Abstracts, 8, 04688.
  15. Haritonova, D. (2012). Solid Earth Tides in the Territory of Latvia. Geomatics, 8, 20–24.
  16. Haritonova, D., Balodis, J., Janpaule, I., Normand, M. (2013). Displacements at the GNSS stations, 4th International Conference Civil engineering. Proceedings Part I Land management and geodesy, 305–309
  17. Jaworski, A., Tahar, A., Reiter, P. M., Ribitsky, I. V., Vaschishak, S. P. (2012). The forecasting system geodynamic danger zone of long engineering facilities, Scientific news, Sofia, 1 (133), 281–285.
  18. BREAKING: The Floor at City Hall. Available at: http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2014/04/30/floor-boston-city-hall-buckles/dxeoNad5weJggzlGKCo5iO/story.html
  19. Earthquake in the Sea of Okhots. Available at: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Землетрясение_в_Охотском_море_%282013%29
  20. Earth orientation centre. Available at: http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/
  21. Kolesnik, A. V., Kapochkinа, M. B., Kapochkin, B. B. (2013). Changing weather conditions during earthquakes. Hydrology, hydrochemistry and hydroekology, 4, 107–112.
  22. 2013-05-24 Mw 8.3 SEA OF OKHOTSK. Available at: http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/Testimonies/comments.php?id=318696
  23. Building in the center of Samara cracked because of the earthquake in the Far Eas. Available at: http://ria.ru/eco/20130524/939238354.html
  24. Earthquake in Mosco. Available at: http://ru-lenta.com/proisshestviya/zemletryasenie-v-moskve-24-maya-2013-0000119658.html#__24_2013-2
  25. 8 points in the Okhotsk Sea turned into a score of 1 in Moscow. Available at: http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=1087670
  26. Okhotsk earthquake was super-fast, proven geologists. Available at: http://www.infox.ru/science/planet/2014/07/11/Ohotskoye_zyemlyetry.phtml
  27. In Odessa collapsed house. Available at: http://kp.ua/incidents/395303-v-odesse-obvalylsia-zhyloi-dom

Downloads

Published

2015-02-25

How to Cite

Учитель, И. Л., & Капочкин, Б. Б. (2015). Need to consider damaging aseismic geodeformations when developing construction technologies. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(7(73), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.37201

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 7(73) (2015): Applied mechanics

Section

Applied mechanics

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Игорь Леонидович Учитель, Борис Борисович Капочкин

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.