Development of a verification method of estimated indicators for their use as an optimization criterion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.95914Keywords:
local efficiency criterion, estimated indicators verification method, optimization criterionAbstract
The optimization criterion is that reference point of the controlled systems, which provides the maximum coherence of the operational process results with the purpose of its owner. Difficulties of solving the tasks, connected with the choice of an adequate optimization criterion are caused by the fact that a large number of indicators intended for use as an optimization criterion have been developed and continue to be developed now.
The verification process of the indicator, which can potentially be used as an optimization criterion, is rather difficult. This difficulty is caused by the fact that the identification process is based on an exclusion method. Those indicators that have shown contradictory results on the classes of operations models identified by the rating efficiency should be excluded from the “contenders”.
During the researches, the hypothesis on the possibility of creating the reference models, allowing the development of direct verification methods wasn’t confirmed. However, the comparative research of cybernetic models of operations with different duration for consistency has allowed setting a restriction on the formation rules of models of this class and defining the rules of their equivalent converting.
Besides, during the researches, the method of creating a class of simple operation models with the predetermined identification, concerning their rating efficiency, has been developed. This means that the rating creation of these models doesn't require determination of local efficiency criteria.
Creation of a new class of reference models expands the possibilities of the estimated indicator verification method. At the same time, the positive effect of expansion of the opportunities of the verification method is shown not so much in an increase in the probability of excluding the inadequate estimated indicator, but in the introduction of a restriction on the rules of creating the classes of reference operation models.
Introduction of a restriction prevents the possibility of excluding the adequate estimated indicator from consideration.
References
- Lutsenko, I., Vihrova, E., Fomovskaya, E., Serdiuk, O. (2016). Development of the method for testing of efficiency criterion of models of simple target operations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (4 (80)), 42–50. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.66307
- Lutsenko, I., Fomovskaya, E., Oksanych, I., Vikhrova, E., Serdiuk, О. (2017). Formal signs determination of efficiency assessment indicators for the operation with the distributed parameters. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (4 (85)), 24–30. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2017.91025
- Gorbatyuk, S. M., Shapoval, A. A., Mos’pan, D. V., Dragobetskii, V. V. (2016). Production of periodic bars by vibrational drawing. Steel in Translation, 46 (7), 474–478. doi: 10.3103/s096709121607007x
- Anishchenka, U. V., Kryuchkov, A. N., Kul’bak, L. I., Martinovich, T. S. (2008). Optimization of the structure of multifunctional information systems according to the criterion of a required value of the efficiency ratio. Automatic Control and Computer Sciences, 42 (4), 203–209. doi: 10.3103/s0146411608040068
- Miskowicz, M. (2010). Efficiency of Event-Based Sampling According to Error Energy Criterion. Sensors, 10 (3), 2242–2261. doi: 10.3390/s100302242
- Xu, Q., Wehrle, E., Baier, H. (2012). Adaptive surrogate-based design optimization with expected improvement used as infill criterion. Optimization, 61 (6), 661–684. doi: 10.1080/02331934.2011.644286
- Xia, L. (2016). Optimization of Markov decision processes under the variance criterion. Automatica, 73, 269–278. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2016.06.018
- Shapoval, A. A., Mos’pan, D. V., Dragobetskii, V. V. (2016). Ensuring High Performance Characteristics For Explosion-Welded Bimetals. Metallurgist, 60 (3-4), 313–317. doi: 10.1007/s11015-016-0292-9
- Vasilyev, E. S. (2013). Optimization of the architecture of a charge pump device on the basis of the energy efficiency criterion. Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, 58 (1), 95–99. doi: 10.1134/s1064226913010099
- Shorikov, A. F., Rassadina, E. S. (2010). Multi-criterion optimization of production range generation by an enterprise. Economy of Region, 2, 189–196. doi: 10.17059/2010-2-18
- Dragobetskii, V. V., Shapoval, A. A., Mospan, D. V., Trotsko, O. V., Lotous, V. V. (2015). Excavator bucket teeth strengthening using a plastic explosive deformation. Metallurgical and Mining Industry, 4, 363–368.
- Mansour, M. R., Delbem, A. C. B., Alberto, L. F. C., Ramos, R. A. (2015). Integrating Hierarchical Clustering and Pareto-Efficiency to Preventive Controls Selection in Voltage Stability Assessment. Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, 487–497. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-15892-1_33
- Harchenko, V. P., Babejchuk, D. G., Slyunyaev, O. S. (2009). Optimization of network information air navigation facilities by the generalized criterion of efficiency. Proceedings of National Aviation University, 38 (1), 3–5. doi: 10.18372/2306-1472.38.1650
- Yang, Q., Xu, J., Cao, B., Li, X.; Xu, J. (Ed.) (2017). A simplified fractional order impedance model and parameter identification method for lithium-ion batteries. PLOS ONE, 12 (2), e0172424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172424
- Malkov, M. V., Malyigina, S. N. (2010). Petri Nets and Modelling. Trudyi Kolskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN, 3, 35–40.
- Lutsenko, I. (2015). Identification of target system operations. Development of global efficiency criterion of target operations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (2 (74)), 35–40. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.38963
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Igor Lutsenko, Elena Fomovskaya, Iryna Oksanych, Svetlana Koval, Olga Serdiuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.
