Identifying the industry-specific quantitative indicators for cloud migration strategy outcomes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.337851

Keywords:

imputation, information systems, quantitative analysis, classification, strategic planning, cloud migration

Abstract

This study’s object is the cloud migration process of information systems (ISs). This paper aims to resolve the task of devising a quantitatively grounded classification of migration strategies while previous approaches relied on conceptual models without empirical validation of industry‐specific performance metrics.

Unlike existing categorizations, the proposed approach employs empirical data from 275 successful cloud migration cases, considering cost reduction, performance improvement, migration duration, as well as the number of cloud services used. Missing values are handled by multiple imputations via chained equations (MICE); outliers were removed using the interquartile range criterion, thereby enhancing result reliability. A taxonomy of three strategies – Lift-and-Shift, Re-platforming, and Reengineering – was established.

Quantitative results indicate that Lift-and-Shift was applied in 39.64% of cases with an average cycle of 5.94 months and cost reduction of 40.06%; Re-platforming in 38.55% of cases with 6.10 months and 38.12% cost savings; Reengineering in 21.82% with 6.28 months, 42% cost savings, and 141.66% performance gain. Further analysis revealed an industry dependence in strategy selection: Lift-and-Shift predominated in regulated sectors, whereas Re-platforming and Reengineering were preferred in high tech industries.

The findings could underpin automated decision support systems for planning cloud migration of IS at medium and large enterprises. The quantitative models enable forecasting of temporal and financial indicators based on system scale, technological landscape, and regulatory requirements. Implementation requires acquisition of performance and cost metrics and integration of MICE and outlier detection into pre-migration audits

Author Biographies

Viktor Shutko, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD Student

Department of Information Control System

Maksym Ievlanov, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Information Control System

Ivan Iuriev, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD, Associate Рrofessor

Department of Information Control System

References

  1. Mittal, M. (2024). The Great Migration: Understanding the Cloud Revolution in IT. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10 (6), 2222–2228. https://doi.org/10.32628/cseit2410612423
  2. Amin, R., Vadlamudi, S. (2021). Opportunities and Challenges of Data Migration in Cloud. Engineering International, 9 (1), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.18034/ei.v9i1.529
  3. Indukuri, A. V. (2025). AI-Powered Cloud Migration: Transforming Enterprise Modernization Strategies. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7 (2), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2025.7.2.60
  4. Sharma, B. P. (2025). Optimizing Cloud Migration Strategies for Large-Scale Enterprises: A Comparative Analysis of Lift-and-Shift, Replatforming, and Refactoring Approaches. Advances in Theoretical Computation, Algorithmic Foundations, and Emerging Paradigms, 15 (2), 1–14. Available at: https://heilarchive.com/index.php/ATCAEP/article/view/2025-FEB-04
  5. Hosseini Shirvani, M., Amin, G. R., Babaeikiadehi, S. (2022). A decision framework for cloud migration: A hybrid approach. IET Software, 16 (6), 603–629. https://doi.org/10.1049/sfw2.12072
  6. Aslam, M., Rahim, L. bin A., Watada, J., Hashmani, M. (2018). Clustering-Based Cloud Migration Strategies. Journal of Advanced Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, 22 (3), 295–305. https://doi.org/10.20965/jaciii.2018.p0295
  7. Chanthati, S. R. (2024). Artificial Intelligence-Based Cloud Planning and Migration to Cut the Cost of Cloud Sasibhushan Rao Chanthati. American Journal of Smart Technology and Solutions, 3 (2), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajsts.v3i2.3210
  8. Ankit, K. G., Apoorva, J. (2025). Efficient Strategies for S/4 HANA Cloud Migration in Large Enterprise Landscapes. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT), 9 (11), 3628–3645. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14836417
  9. Althani, B. (2025). Migration challenges of legacy software to the cloud: a socio-technical perspective. Cogent Business & Management, 12 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2503421
  10. Sahoo, K., Samal, A. K., Pramanik, J., Pani, S. K. (2019). Exploratory Data Analysis using Python. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8 (12), 4727–4735. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.l3591.1081219
  11. Buuren, S. van, Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations inR. Journal of Statistical Software, 45 (3). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03
  12. Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Available at: https://consoleflare.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Exploratory-Data-Analysis-1977-John-Tukey.pdf
Identifying the industry-specific quantitative indicators for cloud migration strategy outcomes

Downloads

Published

2025-08-29

How to Cite

Shutko, V., Ievlanov, M., & Iuriev, I. (2025). Identifying the industry-specific quantitative indicators for cloud migration strategy outcomes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(2 (136), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.337851