Building a model of water jet motion exiting a fire hose

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.341606

Keywords:

two-phase jet, drop zone, fire hose, jet core

Abstract

This study investigates the process of water jet motion in the air; the subject is the trajectory of motion and the velocity vector of water droplets in a two-phase "droplets-air" flow. The task addressed is to construct a model of water jet motion in the air, which would take into account its destruction and transformation into a stream of droplets.

A model of water jet motion in the field of gravity after exiting the fire hydrant in the area of the jet core has been built. The jet expansion coefficient was experimentally determined to be 0.016. Estimates of the jet radius, water droplet velocity, and effective radius of the jet of trapped air at the boundary of the core zone and the droplet zone were constructed. The values obtained are the initial conditions for the model of the motion of the droplet and gas phases of the jet in the droplet zone. The droplet motion was modeled by using the Lagrangian approach, within which the dynamics of the motion of individual drops were considered, described by the equations of motion in three-dimensional space taking into account the forces of aerodynamic resistance and gravity. It was assumed that the distribution of the droplet diameter obeys the Rosin-Ramler law.

A model of the motion of the gas phase of the jet was constructed, based on the equations of mass and momentum balance; it also takes into account the curvature of the jet axis due to the capture of air by drops moving under the action of gravity. The model is based on the assumption of the axisymmetric nature of the jet and the Gaussian velocity distribution in its cross section. A feature of the model is the mutual influence of the droplet and gas phases of the jet on the motion of each other: drops, losing momentum due to aerodynamic resistance, give it to the air. It is shown that drops of smaller diameter have a shorter range compared to drops of larger diameter. As a result, the water falls to the ground not at a specific point but in a certain range. In particular, for a fire hose with a diameter of 19 mm, a delivery angle of 35° to the horizon and a water pressure of (40÷70) m, the width of the range into which 90% of the water falls was (8.7÷11.0) m

Author Biographies

Oleksii Basmanov, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Leading Researcher

Scientific and Testing Department of Fire Protection and Fire Extinguishing Systems Research

Scientific and Research Center of Research and Testing

Institute of Scientific Research on Civil Protection

Volodymyr Oliinyk, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Automatic Safety Systems and Electrical Installations

Oleh Zemlianskyi, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Head of Department

Department of Automatic Safety Systems and Electrical Installations

Olexander Derevyanko, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Automatic Safety Systems and Electrical Installations

Daryna Karpova, National University of Civil Protection of Ukraine

Lecturer

Department of Engineering and Technical Measures for Civil Protection

References

  1. Rahman, F. S., Tannous, W. K., Avsar, G., Agho, K. E., Ghassempour, N., Harvey, L. A. (2023). Economic Costs of Residential Fires: A Systematic Review. Fire, 6 (10), 399. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire6100399
  2. Kawade, A. U., Kawade, P. A., Kaware, A. P., Kkulthe, A. A., Amune, A. C. (2022). Smart Fire Fighting Robot. World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences, 7 (2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjaets.2022.7.2.0137
  3. Abramov, Y., Basmanov, O., Krivtsova, V., Khyzhnyak, A. (2020). Estimating the influence of the wind exposure on the motion of an extinguishing substance. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, 5, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2020.001400
  4. Etzold, M., Deswal, A., Chen, L., Durst, F. (2018). Break-up length of liquid jets produced by short nozzles. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 99, 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2017.11.006
  5. Fan, Q., Deng, Q., Liu, Q. (2024). Research and application on modeling and landing point prediction technology for water jet trajectory of fire trucks under large-scale scenarios. Scientific Reports, 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72476-y
  6. Hou, X., Cao, Y., Mao, W., Wang, Z., Yuan, J. (2021). Models for Predicting the Jet Trajectory and Intensity Drop Point of Fire Monitors. Fluid Dynamics & Materials Processing, 17 (5), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.32604/fdmp.2021.015967
  7. Sallam, K. A., Dai, Z., Faeth, G. M. (2002). Liquid breakup at the surface of turbulent round liquid jets in still gases. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 28 (3), 427–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-9322(01)00067-2
  8. Rezayat, S., Farshchi, M., Berrocal, E. (2021). High-speed imaging database of water jet disintegration Part II: Temporal analysis of the primary breakup. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 145, 103807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2021.103807
  9. Liu, X., Wang, J., Li, B., Li, W. (2018). Experimental study on jet flow characteristics of fire water monitor. The Journal of Engineering, 2019 (13), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.1049/joe.2018.8950
  10. Trettel, B. (2020). Reevaluating the jet breakup regime diagram. Atomization and Sprays, 30 (7), 517–556. https://doi.org/10.1615/atomizspr.2020033171
  11. Trettel, B., Ezekoye, O. A. (2015). Theoretical Range and Trajectory of a Water Jet. Volume 7A: Fluids Engineering Systems and Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2015-52103
  12. Zhu, J., Li, W., Lin, D., Zhao, G. (2018). Study on Water Jet Trajectory Model of Fire Monitor Based on Simulation and Experiment. Fire Technology, 55 (3), 773–787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0804-1
  13. Kooij, S., Sijs, R., Denn, M. M., Villermaux, E., Bonn, D. (2018). What Determines the Drop Size in Sprays? Physical Review X, 8 (3). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevx.8.031019
  14. Privitera, S., Manetto, G., Pascuzzi, S., Pessina, D., Cerruto, E. (2023). Drop Size Measurement Techniques for Agricultural Sprays:A State-of-The-Art Review. Agronomy, 13 (3), 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030678
  15. Salyers B. E. (2010). Spray Characteristics From Fire Hose Nozzles. University of Maryland. Available at: https://drum.lib.umd.edu/items/bd81aff2-327f-4cfe-8047-58e5515c0396
  16. Valencia, A., Zheng, Y., Marshall, A. W. (2021). A Model for Predicting the Trajectory and Structure of Firefighting Hose Streams. Fire Technology, 58 (2), 793–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-021-01175-1
  17. Fan, X., Wang, J., Zhao, F., Li, J., Yang, T. (2018). Eulerian–Lagrangian method for liquid jet atomization in supersonic crossflow using statistical injection model. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018761295
  18. Semko, A., Rusanova, O., Kazak, O., Beskrovnaya, M., Vinogradov, S., Gricina, I. (2015). The use of pulsed high-speed liquid jet for putting out gas blow-out. The International Journal of Multiphysics, 9 (1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1260/1750-9548.9.1.9
  19. Zhang, C., Zhang, R., Dai, Z., He, B., Yao, Y. (2019). Prediction model for the water jet falling point in fire extinguishing based on a GA-BP neural network. PLOS ONE, 14 (9), e0221729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221729
  20. Cheng, H., Zhu, J., Wang, S., Yan, K., Wang, H. (2024). A Study on Predicting the Deviation of Jet Trajectory Falling Point under the Influence of Random Wind. Sensors, 24 (11), 3463. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24113463
  21. Lin, Y., Ji, W., He, H., Chen, Y. (2021). Two-Stage Water Jet Landing Point Prediction Model for Intelligent Water Shooting Robot. Sensors, 21 (8), 2704. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082704
  22. Vambol, S., Vambol, V., Abees Hmood Al-Khalidy, K. (2019). Experimental study of the effectiveness of water-air suspension to prevent an explosion. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1294 (7), 072009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1294/7/072009
  23. EN 15182-2. Portable equipment for projecting extinguishing agents supplied by firefighting pumps – Hand-held branchpipes for fire service use. Part 2: Combination branchpipes PN 16. Available at: https://www.normsplash.com/FreeDownload/115458135/DIN-EN-15182-2-2019-en.PDF
  24. Abramov, Y. A., Basmanov, O. E., Salamov, J., Mikhayluk, A. A. (2018). Model of thermal effect of fire within a dike on the oil tank. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 2, 95–101. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2018-2/12
Building a model of water jet motion exiting a fire hose

Downloads

Published

2025-10-28

How to Cite

Basmanov, O., Oliinyk, V., Zemlianskyi, O., Derevyanko, O., & Karpova, D. (2025). Building a model of water jet motion exiting a fire hose. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(10 (137), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.341606