Art Auctions: Economy, Culture, and Symbolic Value in a Globalised World
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2025.338981Keywords:
art auction, art economy, art market, globalisation, symbolic value, cultural capital, cultural economyAbstract
The purpose of this article is to investigate the complex role of art auctions as platforms where economic and cultural values intersect and influence each other in the globalised contemporary art world. The research focuses on how auctions contribute not only to the determination of market prices but also to the construction of cultural prestige and symbolic recognition for artworks and artists. The research methodology of this study is grounded in a combination of complementary approaches that collectively illuminate the multifaceted role of auctions within the contemporary art market. First, an interdisciplinary framework is employed, integrating economic analysis, sociological theory, and cultural studies. This allows for a nuanced understanding of art auctions as sites where financial transactions intersect with cultural practices of value legitimation. Second, a comprehensive review of scholarly literature was conducted across multiple disciplines, including key contributions by Ashenfelter, Graddy, Bourdieu, Velthuis, McAndrew, and Thompson. This review enabled the contextualisation of art auctions within broader theoretical debates concerning valuation, market behaviour, and globalisation. Third, quantitative analysis of publicly available auction data from leading houses (Christie’s, Sotheby’s, Phillips) was undertaken. This facilitated an examination of price dynamics, geographic market shifts, and bidder behaviour. Specific attention was given to phenomena such as the ‘winner’s curse’ and the role of price guarantees in shaping market expectations. Fourth, qualitative case studies of high-profile auction events — most notably the sale of Salvator Mundi by Leonardo da Vinci — were used to demonstrate the interplay between economic success, symbolic value, and cultural recognition. Finally, a sociological analysis of the auction as a performative social ritual, drawing on Charles W. Smith’s framework, was applied. This perspective reveals how auctions function as choreographed events in which market value is co-constructed with symbolic prestige through institutional credibility, narrative framing, and performative bidding. Together, these methods offer a holistic analytical lens through which the auction is understood not merely as a marketplace but as a dynamic cultural institution where economic and symbolic values are continuously negotiated in a globalised context. The scientific novelty lies in the fact that research offers new insights into how globalisation has intensified the relationship between economic capital and symbolic capital in the art world. It reveals the mechanisms through which art auctions simultaneously operate as economic marketplaces and cultural ceremonies that legitimise artistic value. Conclusions. This article summarises the pivotal role that art auctions play in the contemporary art market. Auctions serve not only as venues for the financial exchange of artworks but also as platforms where economic and cultural values are negotiated, constructed, and publicly performed. By facilitating the transfer of ownership, art auctions simultaneously reinforce cultural hierarchies and contribute to the accumulation of cultural capital. Furthermore, the study reveals that as globalisation progresses, the significance of auctions in shaping both the financial worth and cultural prestige of artworks will continue to be central. In light of the increasing influence of emerging markets and global economic trends, auctions will remain a key mechanism for determining the value of art, while also actively shaping global art market dynamics and reinforcing symbolic capital.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).