Games, Artificial Intelligence, and the Reconfiguration of Humanity’s Cultural Agency

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2025.351851

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, gaming environments, algorithmic culture, cultural dynamics, subjectivity, creativity, institutionalisation, symbolic capital, semiosphere, algorithmic autonomy, cultural production practices, technological innovations

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyse the impact of artificial intelligence development in gaming environments on the transformation of cultural production practices, interpretation, and the legitimation of creativity and knowledge. The research focuses on how algorithmic systems participate in cultural interaction, reshaping understandings of subjectivity, competence, and creativity, and how game-based AI emerges as an autonomous agent of cultural co-evolution. Methodology. The value of the work is in the combination of the comparative conceptual and discursive analysis. Thus, comparative analysis allows for the juxtaposition of semiotic, sociological, and media-theoretical models, while discursive analysis investigates the formation of public narratives regarding AI agency, creativity, and power. An original four-stage model of algorithmic cultural dynamics is used: the generation, social perception, normalisation, and institutionalisation of algorithmic practices in culture. Scientific Novelty. The suggested four-stage model underlines that AI integration in games is not only a technological, but also a cultural phenomenon. It shows how algorithmic systems can become autonomous agents of cultural processes, capable of producing new meanings, generating symbolic capital, reshaping cognitive and aesthetic norms, and creating new models of human-machine collaboration. Conclusions. The development of AI within gaming environments transforms the cultural logic of interaction: from augmenting human computational capabilities (Deep Blue) to autonomous generation of strategies and creativity (AlphaGo, AlphaZero, AlphaStar). Algorithms become not just technical tools but cultural agents defining criteria of competence, value, and legitimacy. The four-stage model illustrates that technological innovations develop into cultural structures, reflecting the change in understanding intelligence, creativity, and subjectivity, while establishing new standards of social and aesthetic interaction.

References

Białecki, A., et al. (2024). Esports training, periodization, and software – A scoping review. Applied Sciences, 14(22), 10354. Retrieved from: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/22/10354 [in English].

Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. Routledge. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288367392_The_creative_mind_Myths_and_mechanisms_Second_edition [in English].

Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Columbia University Press. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275847991_The_Field_of_Cultural_Production_Essays_on_Art_and_Literature [in English].

Campbell, M., Hoane, A. J., & Hsu, F. H. (2002). Deep Blue. Artificial Intelligence, 134(1–2), 57–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(01)00129-1 [in English].

Curran, J. (2019). Media and power, 41(6), 320. DOI :https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203417744 [in English].

DeepMind. (n.d.). AlphaGo. Retrieved from: https://deepmind.google/research/alphago/ [in English].

DeepMind. (2019). AlphaStar: Mastering the real-time strategy game StarCraft II. Retrieved from: https://deepmind.google/blog/alphastar-mastering-the-real-time-strategy-game-starcraft-ii/ [in English].

Galloway, A. R. (2006). Gaming: Essays on algorithmic culture. University of Minnesota Press. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/5059462/Gaming_essays_on_algorithmic_culture_A_Galloway [in English].

Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society. MIT Press. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281562384_The_Relevance_of_Algorithms [in English].

Juul, J. (2005). Half-real: Video games between real rules and fictional worlds. MIT Press. Retrieved from: https://www.academia.edu/3488833/Half_Real_Video_Games_between_Real_Rules_and_Fictional_Worlds_Jesper_Juul [in English].

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308602144_Bruno_Latour_Reassembling_the_Social_An_Introduction_to_Actor-Network_Theory [in English].

Lotman, Y. M. (1992). Culture and explosion. Semiotica, 89(4), 125–139. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395916726_Juri_Lotman's_Cultural_Explosion_and_its_Function_in_Friendship_Studies_and_the_Pragma_sphere [in English].

Minocher, X. (2024). The technological drama of AI: From private power to player engagement with AlphaGo. Journal of Digital Social Research, 6(3), 1–24. Retrieved from: https://publicera.kb.se/jdsr/article/download/40465/29401/85567 [in English].

Silver, D., et al. (2016). Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 529(7587), 484–489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16961 [in English].

Silver, D., et al. (2017). Mastering chess and shogi by self-play with a general reinforcement learning algorithm. arXiv:1712.01815. Retrieved from: https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.01815 [in English].

Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808418 [in English].

Published

2026-02-13

Issue

Section

Культурологія