Praise and Panegirics to the Princes of Ostrogski as a Form of Cultural Representation of Power in Early Modern Society

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2026.356213

Keywords:

chronicles, panegyrics, the Princes of Ostrogski, typology, cultural representation, early modern society, source typology

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to investigate panegyric works dedicated to the Princes of Ostrogski as a form of cultural representation of the elite and a tool for forming the symbolic space of early modern society, and also to propose their source typology. The research methodology consists in an attempt to combine historical-source and philological-source approaches when using for typology both literary and generally cultural approaches to the narrative part of the structure of the source base of the study of the place and role of the Princes of Ostrogski in the history of Eastern Europe based on the application of historical, historiographical and philological methods – as a largely culturological paradigm for studying the issues of the Ukrainian past. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the fact that an attempt is made to structure the set (source database) of panegyric monuments dedicated to Prince Ostrogski, and also introduces an unused anonymous panegyric work into the relevant problem block; as well as in the interpretation of panegyric monuments dedicated to Princes Ostrogski, not only as historical or literary sources, but as a component of the cultural discourse of the era. Conclusions. The article shows the differences in the use of works of a panegyric nature by individual humanities, primarily historical and philological. The publication proves the influence of not only Western, but also Belarusian (although indirectly through Polish) samples on the development of Ukrainian panegyric works. It is shown that it is hardly correct to attribute to literatures, and in general cultures, Belarusian and Ukrainian figures, representatives who are carriers of culture simultaneously ‘Rus’ and separately Ukrainian and Belarusian. For example, A. Rymsha, upon his admission to the Ostroh Academy and creation of panegyric works of Prince Ostrogski, remains primarily a figure of Belarusian culture. In turn, M. Smotrytskyi, regardless of his activities in Belarusian lands and influence on the development of Belarusian culture, will remain, first and foremost, a figure of Ukrainian culture. As works of art, poetic texts require focused research attention and their archeographic development. A typology of sources of a panegyric nature that relate to representatives of the family of Prince Ostrogski is presented. Thus, the panegyric tradition appears as an important mechanism of cultural communication and construction of the image of power in early modern society. It is shown that the cultural identity of figures of this period is transitive in nature and does not fit into rigid national boundaries, and panegyric texts are considered as a significant element of cultural memory and symbolic space, which requires further interpretative processing.

References

Atamanenko, V. (2024). ‘Ostroh’ heroic-epic works of the late 16th century. 3rd International Academic Conference ‘War and Society in the Medieval and Early Modern History of Central and Eastern Europe’: programme and abstracts (15 November 2024, Kamianets-Podilskyi). Kamianets-Podilskyi, pp. 7–11 [in Ukrainian].

Holubev, S. (1876). An archaeological note on ancient monuments found in certain localities of the Volyn Governorate. Proceedings of the Kyiv Theological Academy, 2, 215–227 [in Russian].

Hrushevskyi, M. (1995). History of Ukrainian Literature (Vol. 5, Book 1). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Kavaliou, S. (2004). Poetry in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the mid-16th century. Roczniki Humanistyczne, 105(7), 105–117 [in Belarusian].

Kavaliou, S. (2011). Literature of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the 16th–early 17th Centuries: The Phenomenon of a Cultural Borderland. Minsk [in Belarusian].

The Field of Mars. (1988). (Book 1). Molod [in Ukrainian].

Odnorozhenko, O. (2017). The Heraldry of the Ostrogski Princes in the Light of Newly Discovered Sources. Antykvar, 5–6, 110–121 [in Ukrainian].

Complete Collection of Russian Chronicles. (1980). (Vol. 35). Moscow [in Russian].

Rusyna, O. (2016). ‘The Tale of Prince Konstantin Ostrogski’s Victory at Orsha’: Structure and Sources. Ukrainian Historical Journal, 1, 133–149 [in Ukrainian].

Rusyna, O. (2016). Ukrainian aspects of Belarusian-Lithuanian chronicles: history and historiography. Ukrainian Historical Journal, 6, 127–150 [in Ukrainian].

Stryikovskyi, M. (2011). Chronicle of Poland, Lithuania, Samogitia and All Rus’. Lviv [in Ukrainian].

The Suprasl Manuscript, containing the abridged chronicles of Novgorod and Kyiv. (1836). Moscow [in Russian].

Ukrainian Poetry. Late 16th – Early 17th Centuries. (1978). Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Ukrainian Poetry of the 17th Century (First Half): An Anthology. (1988). Radianskyi pysmennyk [in Ukrainian].

Ukrainian Poetry of the 16th Century (First Half): An Anthology. (1987). Radianskyi pysmennyk [in Ukrainian].

Ulianovskyi, V. (2009). ‘A Man Glorious for All Time’: Prince Konstantin Ivanovich Ostrogsky. Ostroh [in Ukrainian].

Ulianovskyi, V. (2012). Prince Vasyl-Konstantin Ostrogsky: A Historical Portrait in the Gallery of Ancestors and Descendants. Prostir [in Ukrainian].

Yakovenko, N. (2002). A Parallel World: A Study of the History of Concepts and Ideas in Ukraine in the 16th–17th Centuries. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Shevchuk, V. (2004). The Roxolana Muse: Ukrainian Literature of the 16th–18th Centuries (Book 1). Lybid [in Ukrainian].

Rozprawa przygody starego żołnierza. (1595). Kraków [in Polish].

Stryjkowski, M. (1846). Kronika polska, litewska, żmudzka i wszystkiej Rusi (Vol. 2). Warszawa [in Polish].

Published

2026-03-31

Issue

Section

Культурологія