Mass Culture as an Instrument of Social Regulation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2026.362199

Keywords:

social exclusion, language and culture, social regulation, marginalised groups, “norm”, media space, symbolic violence, “otherness”

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive understanding of mass culture as a factor in social regulation and an instrument of social exclusion. Methodology. This study is theoretical and analytical in nature and is based on an interdisciplinary approach that combines socio-philosophical and cultural studies analysis. The study employs systemic-analytical, discursive, hermeneutic, and comparative methods, which allow for an exploration of mass culture as an instrument of social regulation and a mechanism for producing social exclusion. In addition, the principles of critical analysis of sociocultural processes were applied, which made it possible to identify the ambivalent nature of mass culture, including in the context of digitalisation. The scientific novelty of this study lies in identifying the ambivalent nature of mass culture as an instrument of social regulation, which, on the one hand, produces images and practices of inclusion, expanding access to sociocultural resources, and on the other hand, reproduces latent forms of social exclusion. Conclusions. It has been established that mass culture functions as an important instrument of social regulation, which not only shapes the norms and practices of social interaction but also participates in the reproduction of social order through mechanisms of symbolic exclusion and marginalisation. It is shown that in the conditions of postmodern hyper-reality, social exclusion takes on a hidden form and manifests itself in an attempt to appropriate “otherness” through processes of aestheticisation and museumification, thereby depriving marginalised groups of the possibility of resistance. The transformation of the functions of mass culture in the process of digitalisation is emphasised; by expanding the formal possibilities for representing various forms of experience, this transformation has created the preconditions for the emergence of new forms of hidden exclusion. It is demonstrated that the digital environment contributes to the complication of mechanisms of social exclusion, which take on latent forms and are often disguised as practices of inclusion and recognition of the multiplicity of identities.

References

Bodriiar, Zh. (2004). Simulacra and simulation. (V. Khovkhun, Trans.). Osnovy [in Ukrainian].

Bourdieu, P. (2003). Masculine domination. Osnovy [in Ukrainian].

Hoian, I. M., & Budz, V. (2021). Social inclusion vs. social exclusion. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats ΛΌΓOΣ, 172–173 [in Ukrainian].

Derrida, J. (2008). Given time. Litopys [in Ukrainian].

Nietzsche, F. (2021). Beyond good and evil. Folio [in Ukrainian].

Ortega y Gasset, J. (1965). The revolt of the masses. OOChSU [in Ukrainian].

Otreshko, N. B. (2025). Mass culture in society. Entsyklopediia suchasnoi Ukrainy. https://esu.com.ua/article-64262 [in Ukrainian].

Said, E. W. (2001). Orientalism. Osnovy [in Ukrainian].

Storozhuk, S. V., & Hoian, Y. N. (2016). The impact of virtual reality on self-actualization of teenagers: Anthropological dimension. Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research, 9, 17–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15802/ampr2016/7211 [in Ukrainian].

Toffler, A. (2000). The third wave. Vyd. Dim: Vsesvit [in Ukrainian].

Foucault, M. (2003). The archaeology of knowledge. Osnovy [in Ukrainian].

Danylova, T., Kryvda, N., Hoian, I. et al. (2026). Experiencing yourself: Existential well-being as a pathway to inner growth. Mental Health: Global Challenges Journal, 9(1), 13–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56508/mhgcj.v9i1.346 [in English].

Fiske, J. (1989). Understanding popular culture. Routledge [in English].

Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300235029 [in English].

Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage Publications [in English].

Alkhazaleh, M. S., Kamour, M., Mostafa, A. et al. (2025). Digital identities and social inequality: A sociological analysis of identity formation in the era of algorithmic surveillance. Studies in Media and Communication, 13(4), 282–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v13i4.7917 [in English].

Rousseau, A., & Rodgers, R. F. (2025). Social media incidental appearance exposure and young people’s body image: A conceptual review. Body Image, 52, 101838. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2024.101838 [in English].

Schopenhauer, A. (1969). The world as will and representation (Vol. 1). Dover Publications [in English].

Storey, J. (2018). Inventing popular culture: From folklore to globalization. Wiley Blackwell [in English].

Storozhuk, S., Petraniuk, A., Lenov, A. et al. (2023). A healthy society: Social challenges of digitalization and the ways to overcome them (the Ukrainian experience). Wiadomości Lekarskie, 76(9), 2103–2111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202309129 [in English].

Ungless, E. L., Markl, N., & Ross, B. (2025). Experiences of censorship on TikTok across marginalised identities. In Proceedings of the 19th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (pp. 1952–1965). AAAI Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.14164 [in English].

Vaget, H. R. (1971). Dilettantismus und Meisterschaft. Zum Problem des Dilettantismus bei Goethe: Praxis, Theorie, Zeitkritik. Winkler-Verlag [in German].

Yixiu, J. (2025). Media representation and social identity: A study of public discourse construction and the empowerment of marginalised groups in the digital age. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 19(2), 134–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54097/jq9t4b14 [in English].

Published

2026-05-26

Issue

Section

Cultural Studies and Museum Studies