Institutional Role of the Biennial in Shaping the Status of Contemporary Art

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2026.362208

Keywords:

biennial, contemporary art, legitimation, curatorship, institutional recognition, symbolic capital, cultural analysis, global art space

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to analyse the Biennale as an institution for the legitimation of contemporary art within 21st-century culture. The methodological foundation of the article is cultural analysis, which makes it possible to consider the biennale as an institution, an event, and a mechanism for producing artistic significance within the global cultural field. To clarify the processes of legitimization, institutional and discursive approaches are employed: through these, the curatorial selection, exhibition framework, public visibility, symbolic capital, and modes of interpreting contemporary art are analyzed. Scientific novelty. The article demonstrates that the legitimising function of the biennale is realised through institutional selection, curatorial interpretation, exhibition framing, awards, media coverage, national representation, and the inclusion of artists into the global art discourse. Conclusions. In the 21st century, biennales have become a preeminent form of global presentation for contemporary art; however, their role extends far beyond the function of a periodic exhibition. They actively participate in shaping artistic status, international visibility, and symbolic capital, while also defining what art is considered relevant and representative within contemporary culture. Biennales legitimate not only individual works or artists but also specific themes, regions, identities, and models of curatorial practice. They emerge as cultural mechanisms for the production of status, meaning, and symbolic recognition of contemporary art. Their impact is ambivalent: while expanding the boundaries of the artistic canon, they simultaneously reproduce the hierarchies of the global art space.

References

.37627/2311-9489-17-2020-1.178-187 [in Ukrainian].

Tahlina Yu. S., & Kutenko O. S. (2021). The role of the principle of curatorship in contemporary culture. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Seriia “Teoriia kultury i filosofiia nauky”, 63, 68–76. DOI: 10.26565/2306-6687-2021-63-08 [in Ukrainian].

Vytkalov, S. V. (2024). Art biennials as a global phenomenon. Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii kerivnykh kadriv kultury i mystetstv, 4, 156–161. DOI: 10.32461/2226-3209.4.2024.322865 [in Ukrainian].

Acord, S. K. (2010). Beyond the Head: The Practical Work of Curating Contemporary Art. Qualitative Sociology, 33, 447–467. DOI: 10.1007/s11133-010-9164-y [in English].

Bethwaite, J., & Kangas, A. (2018). The Scales, Politics, and Political Economies of Contemporary Art Biennials. Arts and International Affairs, 2 (3). DOI: 10.18278/aia.2.3.6 [in English].

Ceccarelli, D. (2024). In the Shadow of Popularity: Women Artists’ Status and Legitimization in the Contemporary Art System: An Explorative Study. Master’s thesis, Copenhagen Business School. CBS Research Portal. https://research-api.cbs.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/105672388/1854804_Ceccarelli_THESIS_CBS.pdf[in English].

Chao, J., & Kompatsiaris, P. (2020). Curating Climate Change: The Taipei Biennial as an Environmental Problem Solver. Journal of Contemporary Chinese Art, 7 (1), 7–26. DOI: 10.1386/jcca_00017_1 [in English].

Dickie, G. (1974). Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Cornell University Press [in English].

Filipovic, E., van Hal, M., & Øvstebø, S. (Eds.). (2010). The Biennial Reader. Hatje Cantz [in English].

Green, C., & Gardner, A. (2016). Introduction. Biennials, Triennials, and documenta: The Exhibitions that Created Contemporary Art. Wiley Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781119212638.ch0 [in English].

Kompatsiaris, P. (2017). The Politics of Contemporary Art Biennials: Spectacles of Critique in Times of Crisis. Routledge [in English].

Lee, S. H., & Lee, J. W. (2016). Art Fairs as a Medium for Branding Young and Emerging Artists: The Case of Frieze London. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 46 (3), 95–106. DOI: 10.1080/10632921.2016.1187232 [in English].

Marchart, O. (2014). The Globalization of Art and the ‘Biennials of Resistance’: A History of the Biennials from the Periphery. World Art, 4 (2), 263–276. DOI: 10.1080/21500894.2014.961645 [in English].

McGregor, R. (1977). Dickie’s Institutionalized Aesthetic. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 17 (1), 3–13. DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/17.1.3 [in English].

Mersmann, B. (2013). Global Dawning: The Gwangju Biennial Factor in the Making and Marketing of Contemporary Asian Art. Third Text, 27 (4), 525–535. DOI: 10.1080/09528822.2013.810894 [in English].

Morgner, C. (2014). The Biennial: The Practice of Selection in a Global Art World. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 32 (2), 275–282. DOI: 10.2190/EM.32.2.h [in English].

O’Neill, P. (2012). The Culture of Curating and the Curating of Culture(s). MIT Press [in English].

Sassatelli, M. (2015). The Biennalization of Art Worlds: The Culture of Cultural Events. Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Art and Culture. Routledge, 277–289 [in English].

Smith, T. (2012). Thinking Contemporary Curating. Independent Curators International [in English].

Sternfeld, N. (2021). Assembling and Disassembling: Biennials between Boycott and Counter-Hegemony in the Second Decade of the 21st Century. MODOS: Revista de História da Arte, 5 (2), 133–141 [in English].

Zhu, C., & Braden, L. (2022). Emerging in the East: The Shanghai Biennale’s Pathways to Legitimation, 1996 to 2018. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 9, Article 5. DOI: 10.1186/s40711-022-00167-0 [in English].

Published

2026-05-26

Issue

Section

Cultural Studies and Museum Studies