Choreography as an Axiological and Embodied Cultural Practice: Theoretical Foundations for Understanding Dance Beyond Aesthetic Representation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2026.362279

Keywords:

axiology of dance, choreography, cultural memory, cultural studies, ritual-liminal action

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to substantiate a cultural-studies interpretation of choreography as an axiological and embodied practice that functions not only as an aesthetic form but also as a mechanism of cultural memory, identity formation, social communication, and symbolic processing of collective experience. Particular attention is paid to choreography within the contemporary Ukrainian wartime context, in which dance practices acquire additional significance as instruments for maintaining cultural continuity, collective solidarity, and symbolic self-expression. The methodology is based on an interdisciplinary combination of cultural-studies, axiological, semiotic, hermeneutic, phenomenological, and cultural-anthropological approaches. The study also incorporates the concepts of cultural memory, social choreography, and culturally mediated embodied forms of experiencing and processing traumatic experience. The scientific novelty lies in the development of a six-level cultural-studies model of choreography as an embodied and axiological practice. The proposed model distinguishes semiotic-hermeneutic, axiological, phenomenological-embodied, ritual-liminal, socio-ideological, and therapeutically relevant levels of analysis, which are interpreted as interconnected dimensions of a single cultural phenomenon. The conclusions prove that choreography cannot be reduced exclusively to stage aesthetics or physical activity because it represents a complex multi-level cultural practice integrating symbolic, bodily, social, and axiological dimensions. Ukrainian choreographic culture in wartime conditions performs an important function in preserving collective memory and identity, particularly through regional dance traditions and forms of communal synchronisation. The prospects for further research are connected with empirical investigations of culturally grounded choreographic practices in rehabilitation, education, and the symbolic processing of cultural trauma.

References

Babych, O. (2023). “Everyday Body” Model of physicality in theoretical and practical heritage of Merce Cunningham. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, (4), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2023.293711 [in Ukrainian].

Bihus, O. O. (2021). Definition of the concept of “modern dance” in scientific discourse. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, (2), 188–193. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2021.240061 [in Ukrainian].

Vakulenko, O. (2021). The artistic space of a choreographic performance and its hermeneutics. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, (1), 103–107. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2021.229563 [in Ukrainian].

Karpenko, D. (2023). Archetypes in Ukrainian choreographic culture and folk-stage dances. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, (4), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.4.2023.293715 [in Ukrainian].

Kvetsko, N. (2021). Choreographic culture of the Boykos in Prykarpattia (Doctoral dissertation, National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts) [in Ukrainian].

Kinder, K. (2021). Anthropomorphic symbolic images in the Ukrainian folk dancing culture. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, (1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2021.229561 [in Ukrainian].

Pidlypska, A., & Tsvetkova, L. (2023). Treatment of cultural injuries in dance practices: Historical context. Dance Studies, (6), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7646.6.2.2023.295167 [in Ukrainian].

Savchyn, L. (2023). Axiology of dance in the cultural paradigm: Traditions and the present. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, (1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2023.277634 [in Ukrainian].

Sadovenko, S. M. (2023). Choreographical Culture of Ukraine and Creativity of Radu Poklitaru in Theoretical Discourse. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, (2), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2023.286886 [in Ukrainian].

Sharykov, D. (2012). Theory and history of choreographic culture — “choreology” as a science of art studies. Bulletin of the Lviv University. Series of Arts Studies, 11, 261–266. [in Ukrainian].

Dieterich-Hartwell, R., & Melsom, A. M. (Eds.). (2022). Dance/movement therapy for trauma survivors: Theoretical, clinical, and cultural perspectives. Routledge.

Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books.

Hall, S. (Ed.). (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. SAGE Publications.

Hanna, J. L. (1987). To dance is human: A theory of nonverbal communication. University of Chicago Press.

Hewitt, A. (2005). Social choreography: Ideology as performance in dance and everyday movement. Duke University Press.

Laban, R. (1980). The mastery of movement (4th ed). Macdonald & Evans.

Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Aldine Publishing.

Van Gennep, A. (1960). The rites of passage (M. B. Vizedom & G. L. Caffee, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

Issue

Section

Cultural Studies and Museum Studies