Economic-mathematical tools for building up a project team in the system of company’s knowledge management
Keywords:project team, economic-mathematical modeling, weight coefficients, integrated assessment
AbstractEconomic-mathematical model for the formation of a group of employees (project team) for the generation of new organizational knowledge was created. The model implies construction of a integrated assessment for possible project teams and selection of the best one. The model allows taking into account both individual and group indicators of employees. Individual indicators include professional knowledge, education, working experience, intelligence, logical intellect, creative intelligence, self-organization and knowledge, interest and experience in solving similar tasks. The group indicators include social interaction in pairs between group members. The developed model allows taking into account both positive and negative synergistic effect of social interaction. Therefore, considering not only professional and intellectual components, but also synergic effect of social interaction of team members allows formation of the optimal composition of a project team. The specified feature distinguishes the present model from other analogues. The model includes seven stages: from determining the number and all the possible combinations of employees to formation of a project team. The model implies the application of elements of combinatorics to determine the number of possible combinations of groups. In addition, we used expert knowledge and the method of direct assessment for selecting indicators of integrated assessment and selection of weight coefficients. The Harrington scale enabled us to establish the level of experience and knowledge in solving similar tasks. A group of employees was considered as an additive system, so for each group, integral indicator was calculated. The model was implemented on the example, in which 3 employees were selected out of 10 employees of a department. Each of the employees had their indicators of professional, intellectual and social component. According to results of modeling, the highest effectiveness in generation of new organizational knowledge was demonstrated by the group, which has a positive synergistic effect of interaction between employees in a project team
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press, 304.
Hiluha, O., Kuzmin, O., Lipich, L. (2014). Upravlinnia intelektualnum kapitalom mashinobudivnuh pidpriemstv: teoretuchni i praktuchni polozhennia. Luck: Vezha-Druk, 200.
Rozanova, L. (2002). Modelyrovanye vlyianyia temperamentov na dynamyku mezhlychnostnukh otnoshenyi v malukh hruppakh. Matematycheskye strukturi i modelyrovanye, 10, 30–37.
Krstic, B., Petrovic, B. (2012). The role of knowledge management in increasing enterprise's innovativeness. Economics and Organization, 9 (1), 93–110.
Chaikovska, I. (2014). Fraktalnyi analiz ta tendentsii rozvytku innovatsiinykh protsesiv na promyslovykh pidpryiemstvakh. Ekonomichnyi chasopys – XXI, 7-8 (2), 65–68.
Yip, M. W., Ng, A. H. H., binti Din, S. (2012). Knowledge Management Activities in Small and Medium Enterprises/Industries: A Conceptual Framework. 2012 International Conference on Innovation and Information Management (ICIIM 2012), 23–26.
Kulej-Dudek, E. (2013). Evaluation of knowledge management in small and medium-sized enterprises. Polish journal of management studies, 8, 168–174.
Chaikovska I. I. (2016). Economic-mathematical modelling of employee evaluation in the system of enterprise knowledge management. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 9 (183), 417–428.
Chaikovska, I. I. (2015). Evaluation of enterprise knowledge management system. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 10 (172), 221–229.
Bao, C.-P., Tsai, M., Tsai, M. (2007). A new approach to study the multi-objective assignment problem. WHAMPOA – An Interdisciplinary Journal, 53, 123–132.
Odior, A. O., Charles-Owaba, O. E., Oyawale, F. A. (2010). Determining Feasible Solutions of a Multicriteria Assignment Problem. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 14 (1), 35–38. doi: 10.4314/jasem.v14i1.56481
Hlaoittinun, O., Bonjour, E., Dulmet, M. (2007). A team building approach for competency development. 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. doi: 10.1109/ieem.2007.4419343
Imangulova, Z., Kolesnyk, L. (2016). An algorithm for building a project team considering interpersonal relations of employees. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (3 (84)), 19–25. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.85222
Lee, J.-S., Chou, W.-F. (2009). The effects of knowledge management strategy of an enterprise on the knowledge creation capability of R&D team members and their R&D performance. 27th International Conference on Pacific Rim Management.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2017 Inna Chaikovska, Tetyana Fasolko, Ludmila Vaganova, Olga Barabash
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the CREATIVE COMMONS copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.