Devising a procedure to calculate and analyze parameters for passing the flood and breakthrough wave taking into consideration the topographical and hydraulic riverbed irregularities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.252710

Keywords:

breakthrough wave, topographic and hydraulic heterogeneities, model of riverbed flow kinematics

Abstract

It has been established that the most likely period of breakthrough wave occurrence is the time of spring flooding or heavy rain when water-head facilities are subjected to significant loads that lead to the collapse of their individual elements or the entire structure. In addition, the possibility of man-made accidents that can occur at any time cannot be ruled out.

It has been proven that breakthrough wave formation depends on the nature of the destruction or the overflow through a water-head facility. For the study reported in this paper, a model of the kinematics of riverbed and breakthrough flows was used, which is based on the equations of flow, washout, and transport of sediments that are averaged for the depths of the stream. The differential equations describing the nonstationary flow averaged for depth are solved using the numerical grid system FST2DH (2D Depth-averaged Flow and Sediment Transport Model), which implements a finite-element method on the plan of a riverbed's topographic region. These tools are publicly available, which allows their wide application to specific loads and boundary conditions of mathematical models.

The construction of an estimation grid involving the setting of boundary conditions and the use of geoinformation system tools makes it possible to simulate the destruction of a culvert of the pressure circuit and obtain results for a specific case of an actual riverbed and a water-head facility.

It has been established that there is a decrease in the speed of wave propagation along the profile, from 3 m/s to 1 m/s.

The impact of bottom irregularities, the effect of floodplains, and the variety of bottom roughness have also been assessed, compared to the results of their calculation based on one-dimensional models given in the regulatory documents.

Hydraulic calculations were carried out taking into consideration the related properties of the main layer of the floodplain, which consists of peat accumulations, and the heterogeneity of the depths and roughness of floodplain surfaces of soils. It has been established that there is almost no erosion of supports in the floodplain zone in this case.

It was found that as the distance between the flow and breakthrough intersection increases, there is a decrease in the height of the head from 2.1 m to 1.25 m.

Author Biographies

Artur Onyshchenko, National Transport University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Bridges and Tunnels

Borys Ostroverkh, Hydromechanics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

PhD, Senior Researcher, Leading Researcher

Department of Hydrodynamics of Wave and Channel Processes

Liudmyla Potapenko, Hydromechanics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

Engineer-Mathematician

Department of Hydrodynamics of Wave and Channel Processes

Vitalii Kovalchuk, National Transport University Mykhailа

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Bridges and Tunnels

Oleksndr Tokin, National Transport University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Manufacturing, Repair and Materials Engineering

Mykola Harkusha, Limited Liability Company MTZK (LLC MTZK)

PhD, Deputy Director for General Affairs

Iryna Bashkevych, National Transport University Mykhailа

PhD, Аssociate Professor

Department of Bridges and Tunnels

Andrii Koretskyi, Limited Liability Company «Institute Ukrdorproekt»

PhD, Chief Engineer

Nadiia Khvoshchynska, Limited Liability Company MTZK (LLC MTZK)

PhD, Аssociate Professor, Researcher

Iryna Rolinska, Limited Liability Company MTZK (LLC MTZK)

Еngineer

References

  1. Bondar, А. I., Мykhaylenko, L. Е., Vaschenko, V. N., Lapshin, Y. S. (2014). Suchasni problemy hidrotekhnichnykh sporud v Ukraini. Visn. NAN Ukrainy, 2, 40–47. Available at: http://www.visnyk-nanu.org.ua/sites/default/files/files/Visn.2014/2/8.Bondar.pdf
  2. Kim, B. (2014). Resilience Assessment of Dams’ Flood-Control Service. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 34 (6), 1919. doi: https://doi.org/10.12652/ksce.2014.34.6.1919
  3. Strygina, M. A., Gritsuk, I. I. (2018). Hydrological safety and risk assessment of hydraulic structures. RUDN Journal of Engineering Researches, 19 (3), 317–324. doi: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8143-2018-19-3-317-324
  4. Goncharova, O., Bunina, Y., Gaidukova, M., Egorov, V., Mikheeva, O. (2020). Wave breakthrough factor in dam destruction. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1001 (1), 012099. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1001/1/012099
  5. Chen, Y., Lin, P. (2018). The Total Risk Analysis of Large Dams under Flood Hazards. Water, 10 (2), 140. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/w10020140
  6. SNIP 2.05.03-84 "Bridges and Underpasses" Handbook on Surveying and Design of Railroad and Road Bridge Crossings of Streams. Moscow: Transstroy, 177–186.
  7. Slavinska, O., Tsynka, А., Bashkevych, I. (2020). Predicting deformations in the area of impact exerted by a bridge crossing based on the proposed mathematical model of a floodplain flow. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (7 (106)), 75–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.208634
  8. Morales, R., Ettema, R. (2013). Insights from Depth-Averaged Numerical Simulation of Flow at Bridge Abutments in Compound Channels. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 139 (5), 470–481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)hy.1943-7900.0000693
  9. Veremenyuk, V. V., Ivashechkin, V. V., Nemerovets, O. V. (2019). Modeling of Process for Level Changes in Cascade of Two Channel Water Reservoirs in Case of Flooding. Science & Technique, 18 (2), 146–154. doi: https://doi.org/10.21122/2227-1031-2019-18-2-146-154
  10. Zhaparkulova, Y., Nabiollina, M., Amanbayeva, B. (2019). Methods of forecasting calculations of breakthrough wave at hydrodynamic accidents waterstorage dam. E3S Web of Conferences, 97, 05033. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199705033
  11. Chanson, H. (2004). Hydraulics of Open Channel Flow. Butterworth-Heinemann. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-7506-5978-9.x5000-4
  12. Froehlich, D. C. (2003). User’s Manual for FESWMS FST2DH Two-dimensional Depth-averaged Flow and Sediment Transport Model. Release 3.
  13. QGIS Training Manual. Available at: https://docs.qgis.org/testing/en/docs/training_manual/
  14. Greco, M., Mirauda., D., Plantamura, V. (2014). Manning’s Roughness Through the Entropy Parameter for Steady Open Channel Flows In Low Submergence. Procedia Engineering, 70, 773–780. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.02.084
  15. Al-Hashimi, S. A. M., Madhloom, H. M., Nahi, T. N., Al-Ansari, N. (2016). Channel Slope Effect on Energy Dissipation of Flow over Broad Crested Weirs. Engineering, 08 (12), 837–851. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2016.812076
  16. REEF3D User Guide 19.05. Marine Civil Engineering NTNU Trondheim. Available at: https://reef3d.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/reef3d-userguide_19.05.pdf
  17. Stepanov, K. A. (2013). Simplified method for simulation of a dam-break wave propagation to protect lands from flooding. Nauchniy zhurnal Rossiyskogo NII problem melioratsii, 4 (12), 130–140. Available at: http://www.cawater-info.net/bk/dam-safety/files/stepanov.pdf
  18. Koretskyi, A., Onyshchenko, A., Ostroverh, B., Bashkevych, I., Potapenko, L. (2020). Assessment of the impact of a dam break on the durability of the transport structure. Dorogi i Mosti, 21, 226–235. doi: https://doi.org/10.36100/dorogimosti2020.21.226
  19. Vasquez, J. A., Roncal, J. J. (2009). Testing RIVER2D and FLOW-3D for sudden dam-break flow simulations. CDA 2009 Annual Conference. Whistler. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327671462_TESTING_RIVER2D_AND_FLOW-3D_FOR_SUDDEN_DAM-BREAK_FLOW_SIMULATIONS

Downloads

Published

2022-02-25

How to Cite

Onyshchenko, A., Ostroverkh, B., Potapenko, L., Kovalchuk, V., Tokin, O., Harkusha, M. ., Bashkevych, I., Koretskyi, A., Khvoshchynska, N., & Rolinska, I. (2022). Devising a procedure to calculate and analyze parameters for passing the flood and breakthrough wave taking into consideration the topographical and hydraulic riverbed irregularities. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(10(115), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.252710