Formation of separate optimization models for the analysis of transportation-logistics systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.103220

Keywords:

improvement of transportation-logistics systems, vector optimization, functional criteria, effective solutions

Abstract

We proposed an algorithm and a procedure of a multi-criterion analysis of the objects of transportation-logistics systems using the vector optimization of functionals, which provide a more complete representation of the properties of objects and processes. The algorithm is based on a statistical analysis of empirical data, analysis of the influential factors and qualitative characteristics of the processes, which makes it possible to more reasonably define the form of a quality function and to form criteria.

The essence of the proposed procedure of a multi-criterion analysis is the vector optimization of functionals whose equations are introduced with the characteristics of rate of change in the examined processes. In contrast to the existing procedures that characterize a state of the system and separate elements, the given technique allows us to more fully and objectively estimate dynamic properties of the transportation and logistics processes.

Using the movement of cargo flows through the customs warehouse as an example, we have shown the statement of separate mathematical models for simultaneous and independent optimization of several parameters and functionals and the formation of a complete set of effective plans for subsequent analysis by a decision-maker

Author Biographies

Arkadii Bosov, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan Lazaryana str., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010

Doctor of technical sciences, Professor

Department of Applied Mathematics

Nataliya Khalipova, University of Customs and Finance Vernadskoho str., 2/4, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49000

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Transport systems and technologies

References

  1. Strategicheskie voprosy gorizontal'noy politiki: intellektual'nye transportnye sistemy. Evropeyskaya ehkonomicheskaya komissiya. Komitet po vnutrennemu transportu. Sem'desyat vos'maya sessiya. Available at: https://www.unece.org/trans/main/itc/itc_doc_2016.html
  2. Kokaev, O. G., Lukomskaya, O. Yu., Seliverstov, S. A. (2012). O tekhnologii analiza transportnyh processov v sovremennyh usloviyah hozyaystvovaniya. Transport Rossiyskoy Federacii, 2 (39), 32–36.
  3. Lukinskiy, V. S. (Ed.) (2008). Modeli i metody teorii logistiki. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 448.
  4. Kunda, N. T. (2008). Doslidzhennya operatsiy u transportnykh systemakh. Kyiv: Slovo, 400.
  5. Gorev, A. E. (2010). Osnovy teorii transportnyh sistem. Sankt-Peterburg: SPbGASU, 214.
  6. Murad'yan, A. O. (2014). Optimizaciya processa perevalki gruzov v obshchetransportnyh uzlah. Vіsnik NTU “KhPІ», 26 (1069), 64–73.
  7. Butko, T., Prokhorov, V., Chekhunov, D. (2017). Devising a method for the automated calculation of train formation plan by employing genetic algorithms. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (85)), 55–61. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2017.93276
  8. Bauehrsoks, D. Dzh., Kloss, D. Dzh. (2008). Logistika: integrirovannaya cep' postavok. Moscow: ZAO Olimp-Biznes, 640.
  9. Krykavskyy, Ye. V. (2006). Lohistyka. Osnovy teoriyi: pidruchnyk. Lviv: Intelekt-Zakhid, 456.
  10. Mirotin, L. B., A. Nekrasov, G. (2008). Logistika integrirovannyh cepochek postavok. Moscow: Ekzamen, 256.
  11. Oliver, K., Webber, M.; Christopher, M. (Ed.) (1982). Supply chain management: Logistics Catches up with Strategy. Logistics: The Strategy Issues. London: Chapman and Hall, 61–75.
  12. Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining Supply Chain Management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22 (2), 1–25. doi: 10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x
  13. Lambert, D. M. (2014). Supply Chain Management: Processes, Partnerships, Performance. Ponte Vedra Beach, Fla.: Supply Chain Management Institute.
  14. Gattorn, Dzh. (2008). Upravlenie cepyami postavok: spravochnik izdatel'stva Gower. Moscow: INFRA-M, 670.
  15. Chaberek, M. (2005). Makro- i mikroekonomiczne aspekty wsparcia logistycznego. Gdansk: Wydawnictwo uniwersytetu Gdariskiego, 205.
  16. Simchi-Levi, D., Kaminsky, P. (2008). Designing and managing the supply chain: concepts, strategies, and case studies. N.-Y.: McGraw-Hill Companies, 496.
  17. Supply Chain and Logistics Terms and Glossary (2005). Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals, 97.
  18. Szyszka, G. (2004). Sieci logistyczne – nowy wymiar logistyky. Logistyki, 3, 5–7.
  19. Chukhray, N., Hirna, O. (2007). Formuvannya lantsyuha postavok: pytannya teoriyi ta praktyky. Lviv: Intelekt-Zakhid, 232.
  20. Naumov, V. S., Veter, N. S. (2011). Forming method of alternative transport technological cargo delivery systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (4 (53)), 16–19. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/1203/1107
  21. Kengpol, A., Tuammee, S., Tuominen, M. (2014). The development of a framework for route selection in multimodal transportation. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 25 (3), 581–610. doi: 10.1108/ijlm-05-2013-0064
  22. Mashunin, Yu. K. (2001). Teoreticheskie osnovy i metody vektornoy optimizacii v upravlenii ehkonomicheskimi sistemami. Moscow: Logos, 256.
  23. Nogin, V. D. (2004). Prinyatie resheniy v mnogokriterial'noy srede: kolichestvennyy podhod. Moscow: FIZMATLIT, 176.
  24. Zak, Yu. A. (2014). Prikladnye zadachi mnogokriterial'noy optimizacii. Moscow: Ekonomika, 455.
  25. Bosov, A. A. (2007). Funkcii mnozhestva i ih primenenie. Dneprodzerzhinsk: Andrіy, 182.
  26. Kogut, P. I., Manzo, R., Nechay, I. V. (2010). Topological Aspects of Scalarization in Vector Optimization Problems. Australian Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 7 (2), 25–49.
  27. Zaycev, E. H. (2004). Formirovanie sistemy podderzhki prinyatiya resheniy v upravlenii transportnoy deyatel'nost'yu na principah mnogomernogo kuba. Nauchno-tekhnicheskie vedomosti MGTUGA, 88, 40–47.
  28. Bosov, A. A., Mukhina, N. A., Pikh, B. P. (2005). Pidvyshchennya efektyvnosti roboty transportnoyi systemy na osnovi strukturnoho analizu. Dnipropetrovs'k: Vydavnytstvo Dnipropetr. nats. un-tu zalizn. transp. im. akad. V. Lazaryana, 200.
  29. Denysenko, M. P.; Denysenko, M. P., Levkovets', P. R., Mykhaylov, L. I. (Eds.) (2010). Orhanizatsiya ta proektuvannya lohistychnykh system. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoyi literatury, 336.
  30. Intriligator, M.; Konyus, A. A. (Ed.) (1975). Matematicheskie metody optimizacii i ehkonomicheskaya teoriya. Moscow: «Progress», 597.
  31. Muromcev, D. Yu., Shamkin, V. N. (2015). Metody optimizacii i prinyatie proektnyh resheniy. Tambov: Izd-vo FGBOU VPO «TGTU», 80.
  32. Lesnikova, I. Yu., Khalipova, N. V., Svoroba, I. V. (2012). Prohnozuvannya okremykh pokaznykiv diyal'nosti mytnykh orhaniv. Visnyk Akademiyi mytnoyi sluzhby Ukrayiny. Seriya: Tekhnichni nauky, 2, 41–47. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vamsutn_2012_2_8
  33. Lesnikova, I. Yu., Khalipova, N. V. (2010). Porivnyal'nyy analiz prohnoznykh modeley vantazhopotokiv zovnishn'oekonomichnoyi diyal'nosti. Visnyk AMSU. Seriya: Tekhnichni nauky, 1 (43), 75–85.
  34. Kuz'menko, A. I. (2015). Pidvyshchennya efektyvnosti funktsionuvannya prykordonnykh perevantazhuval'nykh stantsiy. Transportni systemy ta tekhnolohiyi perevezen', 9, 35–41.
  35. Khalipova, N. V. (2016). Vektorna optymizatsiya v zadachakh udoskonalennya mizhnarodnykh transportnykh system. Dnipropetrovsk: AMSU, 350.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-30

How to Cite

Bosov, A., & Khalipova, N. (2017). Formation of separate optimization models for the analysis of transportation-logistics systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(3 (87), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.103220

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 3 (87) (2017): Control processes

Section

Control processes

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Arkadii Bosov, Nataliya Khalipova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.