Modeling of maturity of gender-oriented project management office
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.110286Keywords:
project office maturity, gender-oriented project management, gender mainstreamingAbstract
The theoretical and practical models of project management offices and the basic principles of creating a Gender-Oriented Project Management Office (РМОG) are analyzed. Attention is drawn to the peculiarities of gender logical project management systems. Approaches and methods for assessing the maturity of the project office are defined.
The gender component is extrapolated to the contextual parameters of the project management knowledge areas. The model of estimation of РМОG maturity in the context of the development of gender-oriented project management is developed. It is noted that the level of gender responsibility of РМОG can range from advisory support to the continuous improvement of gender-sensitive project management.
A mathematical description is proposed for estimating the level of РМОG maturity. Eight levels of РМОG maturity are outlined: “definition of goals and objectives of the РМОG”; “organization of РМОG”; “development of methods for effective gender-oriented project management”; “development of the organization gender competence”; “recognition of РМОG effectiveness”; “РМОG – center for gender-based project management”; “creation of additional, inclusive, gender project values”; “center for the development of gender-oriented project management”. The global criterion range as a maturity indicator of РМОG is calculated for each level.
The proposed evaluation tool can be used by the РМОG directorates and top management of gender-responsible organizations to self-assess the progress in the development of gender-based project management, as well as to select the actions needed to move to a higher level of maturityReferences
- Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 70-th Session of the UN General Assembly, UN Sustainable Development Summit. Available at: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E/
- A Guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (2013). USA: Project Management Institute, 589.
- Bushuev, S. D. (Ed.) (2009). Rukovodstvo po upravleniyu innovacionnymi proektami i programmami. Vol. 1. Kyiv: Naukovyi svit, 173.
- Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2 (PRINCE2 Guide) (2009). UK: The Stationery Office, 342.
- The Standard for Program Management (2013). USA: Project Management Institute, 176.
- The Standard for Portfolio Management (2013). USA: Project Management Institute, 189.
- The Global Gender Gap Report 2016 (2016). Geneva: World Economic Forum, 371.
- Fesenko, T. G., Shahov, A. V., Fesenko, G. G. (2017). Gender Indexes as the Instrument of New Silk Road Development. Silk Road Develop and Governance Innovation: Social Development International Symposium in “The belt and road” along countries. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 100–105. Available at: http://eprints.kname.edu.ua/45534/
- Hubbard, D. G., Boles, D. M. (2015). PMO Framework and PMO Models for Project Business Management. PM World Journal, IV (I), 1–22.
- Aubry, M., Hobbs, B., Thuillier, D. (2009). The contribution of the project management office to organisational performance. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2 (1), 141–148. doi: 10.1108/17538370910930563
- Fesenko, T. G. (2011). Models of setting up cpmo in the system of managing the program «Euro-2012». Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (3 (52)), 59–67. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/1378/1276
- Bredillet, C., Tywoniak, S., Tootoonchy, M. (2015). Grasping the dynamics of co-evolution between PMO and PfM: a box-changing multilevel exploratory research grounded in a routine perspective. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 2 (3), 90–107.
- Buckle, P., Thomas, J. (2003). Deconstructing project management: a gender analysis of project management guidelines. International Journal of Project Management, 21 (6), 433–441. doi: 10.1016/s0263-7863(02)00114-x
- Fesenko, T. G. (2017). Gender mainstreaming as a knowledge component of urban project management. Bulletin of National Technical University "KhPI". Ser.: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management, 3 (1225), 21–29.
- Olofsdotter, G., Randevåg, L. (2016). Doing masculinities in construction project management. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 31 (2), 134–153. doi: 10.1108/gm-04-2015-0030
- Ali, M., Konrad, A. M. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of diversity and equality management systems: The importance of gender diversity in the TMT and lower to middle management. European Management Journal, 35 (4), 440–453. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2017.02.002
- Henderson, L. S., Stackman, R. W. (2010). An exploratory study of gender in project management: Interrelationships with role, location, technology, and project cost. Project Management Journal, 41 (5), 37–55. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20175
- Fesenko, Т. G. (2017). The gender oriented project management office: principles of modeling. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, 29, 86–94. Available at: http://urss.knuba.edu.ua/files/zbirnyk-29/13.pdf
- Fesenko, Т. G. (2015). Gender Mainstreaming as a Factor of Project Management Maturity. Management of development of complex systems, 23, 5–10. Available at: http://urss.knuba.edu.ua/files/zbirnyk-23/1.pdf
- Fesenko, T., Fesenko, G. (2017). Developing gender maturity models of project and program management system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (85)), 46–55. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2017.28031
- Kendall, G. I., Rollins, S. C. (2003). Advanced project portfolio management and the PMO multiplying ROI at wrap speed. London: Transatlantic, 434.
- Official site UN Women. Available at: http://eca.unwomen.org/en/where-we-are/ukraine
- Pro skhvalennia Kontseptsii Derzhavnoi sotsialnoi prohramy zabezpechennia rivnykh prav ta mozhlyvostei zhinok i cholovikiv na period do 2021 roku (2017). Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy, No. 229-r. Available at: http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/uk/cardnpd?docid=249890469
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Tetiana Fesenko, Anatoliy Shakhov, Galyna Fesenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.