Modeling of maturity of gender-oriented project management office

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.110286

Keywords:

project office maturity, gender-oriented project management, gender mainstreaming

Abstract

The theoretical and practical models of project management offices and the basic principles of creating a Gender-Oriented Project Management Office (РМОG) are analyzed. Attention is drawn to the peculiarities of gender logical project management systems. Approaches and methods for assessing the maturity of the project office are defined.

The gender component is extrapolated to the contextual parameters of the project management knowledge areas. The model of estimation of РМОG maturity in the context of the development of gender-oriented project management is developed. It is noted that the level of gender responsibility of РМОG can range from advisory support to the continuous improvement of gender-sensitive project management.

A mathematical description is proposed for estimating the level of РМОG maturity. Eight levels of РМОG maturity are outlined: “definition of goals and objectives of the РМОG”; “organization of РМОG”; “development of methods for effective gender-oriented project management”; “development of the organization gender competence”; “recognition of РМОG effectiveness”; “РМОG – center for gender-based project management”; “creation of additional, inclusive, gender project values”; “center for the development of gender-oriented project management”. The global criterion range as a maturity indicator of РМОG is calculated for each level.

The proposed evaluation tool can be used by the РМОG directorates and top management of gender-responsible organizations to self-assess the progress in the development of gender-based project management, as well as to select the actions needed to move to a higher level of maturity

Author Biographies

Tetiana Fesenko, Luhansk National Agrarian University Alchevskykh str., 44, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Engineering and Architecture

Anatoliy Shakhov, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikov str., 34, Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Ship Repair

Galyna Fesenko, O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv Marshala Bazhanova str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of History and Cultural Studies

References

  1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 70-th Session of the UN General Assembly, UN Sustainable Development Summit. Available at: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E/
  2. A Guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (2013). USA: Project Management Institute, 589.
  3. Bushuev, S. D. (Ed.) (2009). Rukovodstvo po upravleniyu innovacionnymi proektami i programmami. Vol. 1. Kyiv: Naukovyi svit, 173.
  4. Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2 (PRINCE2 Guide) (2009). UK: The Stationery Office, 342.
  5. The Standard for Program Management (2013). USA: Project Management Institute, 176.
  6. The Standard for Portfolio Management (2013). USA: Project Management Institute, 189.
  7. The Global Gender Gap Report 2016 (2016). Geneva: World Economic Forum, 371.
  8. Fesenko, T. G., Shahov, A. V., Fesenko, G. G. (2017). Gender Indexes as the Instrument of New Silk Road Development. Silk Road Develop and Governance Innovation: Social Development International Symposium in “The belt and road” along countries. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 100–105. Available at: http://eprints.kname.edu.ua/45534/
  9. Hubbard, D. G., Boles, D. M. (2015). PMO Framework and PMO Models for Project Business Management. PM World Journal, IV (I), 1–22.
  10. Aubry, M., Hobbs, B., Thuillier, D. (2009). The contribution of the project management office to organisational performance. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2 (1), 141–148. doi: 10.1108/17538370910930563
  11. Fesenko, T. G. (2011). Models of setting up cpmo in the system of managing the program «Euro-2012». Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (3 (52)), 59–67. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/1378/1276
  12. Bredillet, C., Tywoniak, S., Tootoonchy, M. (2015). Grasping the dynamics of co-evolution between PMO and PfM: a box-changing multilevel exploratory research grounded in a routine perspective. The Journal of Modern Project Management, 2 (3), 90–107.
  13. Buckle, P., Thomas, J. (2003). Deconstructing project management: a gender analysis of project management guidelines. International Journal of Project Management, 21 (6), 433–441. doi: 10.1016/s0263-7863(02)00114-x
  14. Fesenko, T. G. (2017). Gender mainstreaming as a knowledge component of urban project management. Bulletin of National Technical University "KhPI". Ser.: Strategic management, portfolio, program and project management, 3 (1225), 21–29.
  15. Olofsdotter, G., Randevåg, L. (2016). Doing masculinities in construction project management. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 31 (2), 134–153. doi: 10.1108/gm-04-2015-0030
  16. Ali, M., Konrad, A. M. (2017). Antecedents and consequences of diversity and equality management systems: The importance of gender diversity in the TMT and lower to middle management. European Management Journal, 35 (4), 440–453. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2017.02.002
  17. Henderson, L. S., Stackman, R. W. (2010). An exploratory study of gender in project management: Interrelationships with role, location, technology, and project cost. Project Management Journal, 41 (5), 37–55. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20175
  18. Fesenko, Т. G. (2017). The gender oriented project management office: principles of modeling. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, 29, 86–94. Available at: http://urss.knuba.edu.ua/files/zbirnyk-29/13.pdf
  19. Fesenko, Т. G. (2015). Gender Mainstreaming as a Factor of Project Management Maturity. Management of development of complex systems, 23, 5–10. Available at: http://urss.knuba.edu.ua/files/zbirnyk-23/1.pdf
  20. Fesenko, T., Fesenko, G. (2017). Developing gender maturity models of project and program management system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (85)), 46–55. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2017.28031
  21. Kendall, G. I., Rollins, S. C. (2003). Advanced project portfolio management and the PMO multiplying ROI at wrap speed. London: Transatlantic, 434.
  22. Official site UN Women. Available at: http://eca.unwomen.org/en/where-we-are/ukraine
  23. Pro skhvalennia Kontseptsii Derzhavnoi sotsialnoi prohramy zabezpechennia rivnykh prav ta mozhlyvostei zhinok i cholovikiv na period do 2021 roku (2017). Kabinet Ministriv Ukrainy, No. 229-r. Available at: http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/uk/cardnpd?docid=249890469

Downloads

Published

2017-10-25

How to Cite

Fesenko, T., Shakhov, A., & Fesenko, G. (2017). Modeling of maturity of gender-oriented project management office. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(3 (89), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.110286

Issue

Section

Control processes