Substantiation of structure of the port handling equipment fleet based on a multicriteria approach

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.111971

Keywords:

port handling equipment, multi-criteria evaluation, Pareto frontier, mobile equipment

Abstract

The model that allows substantiation of choice of the optimal structure of the port handling machinery fleet was constructed and analyzed. In today's competitive environment in the field of port business, it is necessary to primarily focus on the interests of clients, in particular in the process of consideration of alternative options of development of handling equipment fleet. In this regard, it is reasonable to choose not the strategies, allowing us to minimize costs (or to maximize profit), but rather strategies, slightly yielding in terms of expected economic indicators, but significantly enhancing the quality of port services. To achieve the balance in the system of relationships "cargo owners – ports – ship owners", the authors proposed the technique of determining of structure of the fleet of port handling equipment, which will make it possible to take into account the interests of all participants of the market of port services. To determine the values of average annual costs, profits of the production transshipment complex and the average vessels’ berthing time, the procedure used the apparatus of mass service theory. In order to achieve optimum ratio of listed indicators, the methods of multicriteria optimization were used in the work. A fleet can include both stationary and mobile equipment. This technique makes it possible to achieve the balance between economic performance of the port operation and average berthing time of vessels under conditions when the time between ship calls is a random magnitude

Author Biographies

Yelena Kirillova, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikov str., 34, Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Port Operations and Cargo Handling Technology

Mariya Malaksiano, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikov str., 34, Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

Assistant

Department of Port Operations and Cargo Handling Technology

References

  1. Talley, W. K., Ng, M., Marsillac, E. (2014). Port service chains and port performance evaluation. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 69, 236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2014.05.008
  2. Bergantino, A. S., Musso, E. (2011). The role of external factors versus managerial ability in determining seaports’ relative efficiency: An input-by-input analysis through a multi-step approach on a panel of Southern European ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 13 (2), 121–141. doi: 10.1057/mel.2011.1
  3. Kirillova, Е. V. (2015). Justification of stability ranges of commercially reasonable, allowable loss-making and crisis operation of the vessel. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (3 (78)), 4–10. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.55007
  4. Kirillova, Y. V., Meleshenko, Y. S. (2014). Justification of financial safety analysis approach in cargo-and-passenger ferry operations management. Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 15 (2), 111–119. doi: 10.2478/ttj-2014-0010
  5. Budiono, A. (2016). The development of a queuing model for optimization of sea port facilities at Tanjung Perak seaport. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 13 (6), 93–100.
  6. Wan, Y., Basso, L. J., Zhang, A. (2016). Strategic investments in accessibility under port competition and inter-regional coordination. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 93, 102–125. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.07.011
  7. Díaz-Hernández, J. J., Martínez-Budría, E., Jara-Díaz, S. (2008). The effects of ignoring inefficiency in the analysis of production: The case of cargo handling in Spanish ports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 42 (2), 321–329. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2007.10.002
  8. Talley, W. K., Ng, M. (2013). Maritime transport chain choice by carriers, ports and shippers. International Journal of Production Economics, 142 (2), 311–316. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.11.013
  9. Malaksіano, M. O. (2008). Otsіnka tryvalostі obslugovuvannia suden na termіnalі z rіznotypnym ustatkuvanniam. Metody ta zasoby upravlinnia rozvytkom transportnykh system, 14, 108–124.
  10. Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multicriteria optimization. Berlin: Springer, 323. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27659-9

Downloads

Published

2017-10-25

How to Cite

Kirillova, Y., & Malaksiano, M. (2017). Substantiation of structure of the port handling equipment fleet based on a multicriteria approach. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(3 (89), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.111971

Issue

Section

Control processes