Modeling of customer­oriented construction project management using the gender logic systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.123124

Keywords:

project management, construction project, gender approach, Project Management Office

Abstract

The specificity of the feminine and masculine contexts of managing the customer needs in the construction project is highlighted. It is substantiated that the customer-oriented context of the gender logic systems of construction project management allows improving existing management approaches on the platform of values, which is wider than the traditional “triangle of design constraints” (time, cost, quality). The existing gender cognitive gap of project management standards (PMBOK, PMBOK Construction) is described in terms of defining the place and role of customers.

The gender-balanced model of the customer-oriented system of construction project management in the parameters of processes, methods and tools of project management is proposed. The developed corresponding matrix, which includes analytical tools for managing the customer needs, deepens the integration of participatory (feminine) management in the “body of knowledge” of the РМВОК. The dynamics of application of customer-oriented project activities at different phases of a construction project life cycle is taken into account. The customer-oriented components of the characteristics of the corresponding processes were formulated by extrapolating the feminine logic system into the matrix of customer-sensitive construction project management processes. The correlation between the feminine customer management system and the formation of a qualitative context of architectural and planning decisions of construction projects is demonstrated.

The results of customer-oriented modeling are discussed on an example of Construction Project Management Office (СPМО). Four phases of client-orientation are revealed: “І – customer interest (to hear his voice)”; “ІІ – implementation of “individual customer requirements” in architectural and spatial, design and technical solutions”; “ІІІ – customer-oriented execution of construction and installation work”; “IV – loyal customer of the company-developer”. The proposed evaluation tool will allow the top management of the companies-developers, СРМОС to carry out a self-assessment of progress in the development of client-oriented construction project management and to choose the actions necessary to move from “initiation” to ”completion” of the project.

Author Biographies

Tetiana Fesenko, Luhansk National Agrarian University Аlchevskykh str., 44, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Engineering and Architecture

Anatoliy Shakhov, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikov str., 34, Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Vice Rector for Educational and Organizational Work

Department of Ship Repair

Galyna Fesenko, O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv Marshala Bazhanova str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of History and Cultural Studies

Natalya Bibik, O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv Marshala Bazhanova str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Enterprise Economics, Business Administration and Regional Development

Valeriia Tupchenko, Luhansk National Agrarian University Аlchevskykh str., 44, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD

Department of General Education 

References

  1. Kuk, S. (2004). Klient v fokuse: Kak pomestit' interesy klienta v centr vnimaniya vashey organizacii. Dnipropetrovsk: Balans-Klub, 272.
  2. Chalmeta, R. (2006). Methodology for customer relationship management. Journal of Systems and Software, 79 (7), 1015–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.10.018
  3. Oly Ndubisi, N. (2006). Effect of gender on customer loyalty: a relationship marketing approach. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24 (1), 48–61. doi: 10.1108/02634500610641552
  4. A Guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (2017). USA: Project Management Institute, 589.
  5. A Guide to the project management body of knowledge Construction (PMBOK® Guide) (2016). USA: Project Management Institute, 489.
  6. Buckle, P., Thomas, J. (2003). Deconstructing project management: a gender analysis of project management guidelines. International Journal of Project Management, 21 (6), 433–441. doi: 10.1016/s0263-7863(02)00114-x
  7. Olofsdotter, G., Randevåg, L. (2016). Doing masculinities in construction project management. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 31 (2), 134–153. doi: 10.1108/gm-04-2015-0030
  8. Fesenko, T., Fesenko, G., Minaev, D. (2016). The decision-making modeling for the building project scope evaluation in conditions of the recreational territory development. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (79)), 32–37. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.60644
  9. Abramsson, M., Andersson, E. (2015). Changing Preferences with Ageing – Housing Choices and Housing Plans of Older People. Housing, Theory and Society, 33 (2), 217–241. doi: 10.1080/14036096.2015.1104385
  10. Fesenko, T., Minaev, D. (2014). Costomer focus in the project communications management (on the example of house building). Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (3 (71)), 4–10. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2014.28032
  11. Fesenko, T. G., Minayev, D. M., Belyatsky, O. V., Usachev, I. S. (2013). Implementatsiya hendernykh pidkhodiv u munitsypalni prohramy rozvytku zhytlovo-komunalnoho hospodarstva. Materialy III mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsiyi (Kharkivskyi natsionalnyi universytet miskoho hospodarstva imeni O. M. Beketova. «Henderna polityka mist: istoriya i suchasnist». Issue 4. Kharkiv: KhNUMH im. O. M. Beketova, 238–240.
  12. Fesenko, T. H., Minayev, D. M., Nepochatova, D. O. (2015). Hendernyi profil pokuptsiv zhytlovoi nerukhomosti (na prykladi proektiv TDV «Zhytlobud-2», Kharkiv). Henderna polityka mist: istoriya i suchasnist: materialy IV mizhnar. nauk.-prakt. konf. Kharkiv: KhNUMH im. O. M. Beketova, 306–310.
  13. Leaman, A., Stevenson, F., Bordass, B. (2010). Building evaluation: practice and principles. Building Research & Information, 38 (5), 564–577. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2010.495217
  14. Yang, J.-B., Peng, S.-C. (2008). Development of a customer satisfaction evaluation model for construction project management. Building and Environment, 43 (4), 458–468. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.07.044
  15. Smyrychynskyi, V. V., Tymoshenko, L. M. (2012). Innovatsiyni aspekty informatsiynoho zabezpechennia lohistychnykh system budivelnoho kompleksu. Ekonomika: realiyi chasu, 1 (2), 169–174.
  16. Sohrabi, B., Haghighi, M., Khanlari, A. (2010). Customer relationship management maturity model (CRM3): A model for stepwise implementation. Journal of Human Sciences, 7 (1). Available at: https://www.j-humansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/802/462
  17. Dyché, J. (2004). The CRM Handbook: A Business Guide to Customer Relationship Management. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional, 336.
  18. Babaev, V. M., Fesenko, T. G. (2010). Conceptual model of the organizing of office management of building projects in the long term priject management. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (43)), 9–11. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/2519/2323
  19. Fesenko, T. G. (2011). Models of setting up CPMO in the system of managing the program «Euro-2012». Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (3 (52)), 59–67. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/1378/1276
  20. Buckle-Henning, P., Thomas, J. (2008). A boundary critique of gender in the project management body of knowledge. Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the ISSS. Available at: http://journals.isss.org/index.php/proceedings52nd/article/view/1015/327
  21. Thomas, J. L., Buckle-Henning, P. (2007). Dancing in the white spaces: Exploring gendered assumptions in successful project managers’ discourse about their work. International Journal of Project Management, 25 (6), 552–559. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.05.001
  22. Fesenko, T., Shakhov, A., Fesenko, G. (2017). Modeling of maturity of gender-oriented project management office. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (3 (89)), 30–38. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2017.110286
  23. Rynok dosiah dna: v Kyievi rizko vpaly prodazhi kvartyr (2018). UNIAN. Available at: https://economics.unian.ua/realestate/2353105-rinok-dosyag-dna-v-kievi-rizko-vpali-prodaji-kvartir.html
  24. Atkinson, R. (1999). Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. International Journal of Project Management, 17 (6), 337–342. doi: 10.1016/s0263-7863(98)00069-6
  25. Bushuev, S. D. (Ed.) (2009). Rukovodstvo po upravleniyu innovacionnymi proektami i programmami. Vol. 1. Versiya 1.2. Kyiv: Naukovyi svit, 173.
  26. Fesenko, Т. Minaev, D. (2015). The integration of the beneficiary’s interests in housing project to the system of values. Management of complex systems, 21, 81–86.
  27. Lindgren, M., Packendorff, J. (2006). What's New in New Forms of Organizing? On the Construction of Gender in Project-Based Work. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (4), 841–866. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00613.x
  28. Midgley, G. (1996). What is this thing called CST? Critical Systems Thinking. New York: Plenum Press, 11–24. doi: 10.1007/978-0-585-34651-9_1
  29. Finsterbusch, K., Van Wicklin, W. A. (1987). The contribution of beneficiary participation to development project effectiveness. Public Administration and Development, 7 (1), 1–23. doi: 10.1002/pad.4230070102
  30. Fesenko, T., Fesenko, G., Bibik, N. (2017). The safe city: developing of GIS tools for gender-oriented monitoring (on the example of Kharkiv city, Ukraine). Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (2 (87)), 25–33. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2017.103054
  31. Pro zatverdzhennia Derzhavnoi tsilovoi sotsialno-ekonomichnoi prohramy budivnytstva (prydbannia) dostupnoho zhytla na 2010–2017 roky. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Available at: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1249-2009-%D0%BF

Downloads

Published

2018-02-08

How to Cite

Fesenko, T., Shakhov, A., Fesenko, G., Bibik, N., & Tupchenko, V. (2018). Modeling of customer­oriented construction project management using the gender logic systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(3 (91), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.123124

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 3 (91) (2018): Control processes

Section

Control processes

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Tetiana Fesenko, Anatoliy Shakhov, Galyna Fesenko, Natalya Bibik, Valeriia Tupchenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.