Development of a concept for building a critical infrastructure facilities security system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.233533

Keywords:

critical infrastructure, security system, threat classifier, concept, modeling method

Abstract

To effectively protect critical infrastructure facilities (CIF), it is important to understand the focus of cybersecurity efforts. The concept of building security systems based on a variety of models describing various CIF functioning aspects is presented.

The development of the concept is presented as a sequence of solving the following tasks. The basic concepts related to cyberattacks on CIF were determined, which make it possible to outline the boundaries of the problem and determine the level of formalization of the modeling processes. The proposed threat model takes into account possible synergistic/emergent features of the integration of modern target threats and their hybridity. A unified threat base that does not depend on CIF was formed. The concept of modeling the CIF security system was developed based on models of various classes and levels. A method to determine attacker's capabilities was developed. A concept for assessing the CIF security was developed, which allows forming a unified threat base, assessing the signs of their synergy and hybridity, identifying critical CIF points, determining compliance with regulatory requirements and the state of the security system. The mathematical tool and a variety of basic models of the concept can be used for all CIFs, which makes it possible to unify preventive measures and increase the security level. It is proposed to use post-quantum cryptography algorithms on crypto-code structures to provide security services. The proposed mechanisms provide the required stability (230–235 group operations), the rate of cryptographic transformation is comparable to block-symmetric ciphers (BSC) and reliability (Perr 10–9–10–12)

Author Biographies

Serhii Yevseiev, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

Doctor of Technical Science, Professor

Department of Cyber Security and Information Technology

Yevgen Melenti, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

PhD

Special Department No. 2 «Tactical-Special Training, Marksmanship Training and Special Physical Training»

Juridical Personnel Training Institute for the Security Service of Ukraine

Oleksandr Voitko, The National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi

PhD, Deputy Head of Department

Department of Information Technologies and Information Security Employment

Institute of the Troops (Forces) Support and Information Technologies

Vitalii Hrebeniuk, National Academy of Security Service of Ukraine

Doctor of Law, Senior Reseacher, Head of Laboratory

Scientific Laboratory

Anna Korchenko, National Aviation University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of IT-Security

Serhii Mykus, The National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Information Technologies and Information Security Employment

Institute of the Troops (Forces) Support and Information Technologies

Oleksandr Milov, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

Doctor of Technical Science, Professor

Department of Cyber Security and Information Technology

Oleksandr Prokopenko, The National Defence University of Ukraine named after Ivan Cherniakhovskyi

Adjunct

Center of Military and Strategic Studies

Оleksandr Sievierinov, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Information Technology Security

Dmytro Chopenko, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

Junior Researcher

Air Force Science Center

References

  1. (U//FOUO) Leftwing Extremists Likely to Increase Use of Cyber Attacks over the Coming Decade (2016). Washington: Department of Homeland Security. Available at: https://fas.org/irp/eprint/leftwing.pdf
  2. Stouffer, K., Pillitteri, V., Lightman, S., Abrams, M., Hans, A. (2015). Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security. National Institute of Standard and Technology. Available at: http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-82r2.pdf
  3. Stoddart, K. (2016). UK cyber security and critical national infrastructure protection. International Affairs, 92 (5), 1079–1105. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12706
  4. Konstantas, J. (2016, April 19). Dam Hackers! The Rising Risks to ICS and SCADA Environments. Security Week. Available at: http://www.securityweek.com/dam-hackers-rising-risks-ics-and-scada-environments
  5. Westervelt, R. (2012). Old Application Vulnerabilities, Misconfigurations Continue to Haunt. TechTarget. Available at: https://searchsecurity.techtarget.com/
  6. Ashford, W. (2014). Industrial control systems: What are the security challenges? Computer Weekly. Available at: http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240232680/Industrial-control-systems-What-are-the-security-challenges
  7. Schneider, J., Obermeier, S., Schlegal, R. (2015). Cyber Security maintenance for SCADA systems. 15 Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium for ICS & SCADA Cyber Security Research, 89–94. doi: http://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/ics2015.10
  8. Russon, M. (2016). How hackers could cripple the UK: Doomsday infrastructure cyber attacks would cost country £442bn. International Business Times. Available at: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/how-hackers-could-cripple-uk-critical-infrastructure-cyberattacks-would-cost-country-442bn-1554509
  9. Fjäder, C. (2014). The nation-state, national security and resilience in the age of globalisation. Resilience, 2 (2), 114–129. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/21693293.2014.914771
  10. Holt, T. J., Bossler, A. M., Seigfried-Spellar, K. C. (2015). Cybercrime And Digital Forensics: An Introduction. New York: Routledge, 500. doi: http://doi.org/10.4324/9781315777870
  11. Charlton, C. (2017). Armchair Warriors: Terrifying new generation of ‘cybernative’ ISIS terrorists could target ‘Facebook and West’s energy grids’ in a bid to cause mass panic and mayhem. The Sun. Available at: https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2643688/cyber-terrorism-attacks-threat-level-isis-facebook-energy/
  12. Denning, D. E. (2000). Cyber terrorism: The Logic Bomb versus the Truck Bomb. Global Dialogue, 2 (4), 29–37.
  13. Shmatko, O., Balakireva, S., Vlasov, A., Zagorodna, N., Korol, O., Milov, O. et. al. (2020). Development of methodological foundations for designing a classifier of threats to cyberphysical systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (9 (105)), 6–19. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.205702
  14. Hryshchuk, R., Yevseiev, S., Shmatko, A. (2018). Construction methodology of information security system of banking information in automated banking systems. Vienna: Premier Publishing s. r. o., 284. doi: http://doi.org/10.29013/r.hryshchuk_s.yevseiev_a.shmatko.cmissbiabs.284.2018
  15. Kondratov, S., Bobro, D., Horbulin, V. et. al.; Sukhodolia, O. (Ed.) (2017). Developing The Critical Infrastructure Protection System in Ukraine. Kyiv: NISS, 184.
  16. Marsh, R. T. (Ed.) (1997). Critical Infrastructures: Protecting America’s Infrastructures. United States Government Printing Office. Report of the President’s Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection. Washington.
  17. Abele-Wigert, I., Dunn, M., Wenger, A., Mauer, V. (Eds.) (2006). International CIIP Handbook 2006: An Inventory of 20 National and 6 International Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Policies. Center for Security Studies. Vol. I. ETH Zurich. Zurich, 495.
  18. Dunn, M., Mauer, V., Abele-Wigert, I. (Eds.) (2006). Ineternational CIIP Handbook 2006: Analyz- ing Issues, Challenges, and Prospects. Center for Security Studies. Vol. II. ETH Zurich. Zurich, 238.
  19. Assaf, D. (2008). Models of critical information infrastructure protection. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 1, 6–14. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2008.08.004
  20. Lagadec, P.(1981). La Civilisation du Risque: Catastrophes Technologiques et Responsabilite´ Sociale. Science Ouverte. Paris: E´ditions du Seuil, 21.
  21. Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
  22. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies. New York: Basic Books, 386.
  23. Rinaldi, S. M., Peerenboom, J. P., Kelly, T. K. (2001). Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Control Systems, 21 (6), 11–25. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/37.969131
  24. Casalicchio, E., Galli, E., Tucci, S.; Setola, R., Geretshuber, S. (Eds.) (2009). Modeling and Simulation of Complex Interdependent Systems: A Federated Agent-Based Approach. CRITIS 2008. LNCS. Heidelberg: Springer, 5508, 72–83. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03552-4_7
  25. Haimes, Y. Y., Jiang, P. (2001). Leontief-Based Model of Risk in Complex Interconnected Infrastructures. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 7 (1), 1–12. doi: http://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2001)7:1(1)
  26. Haimes, Y. Y., Horowitz, B. M., Lambert, J. H., Santos, J. R., Lian, C., Crowther, K. G. (2005). Inoperability Input-Output Model for Interdependent Infrastructure Sectors. I: Theory and Methodology. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 11 (2), 67–79. doi: http://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2005)11:2(67)
  27. Santos, J. R., Haimes, Y. Y. (2004). Modeling the Demand Reduction Input‐Output (I‐O) Inoperability Due to Terrorism of Interconnected Infrastructures*. Risk Analysis, 24 (6), 1437–1451. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00540.x
  28. Haimes, Y. Y., Horowitz, B. M., Lambert, J. H., Santos, J., Crowther, K., Lian, C. (2005). Inoperability Input-Output Model for Interdependent Infrastructure Sectors. II: Case Studies. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 11 (2), 80–92. doi: http://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2005)11:2(80)
  29. Setola, R.; Goetz, E., Shenoi, S. (Eds.) (2007). Analysis of Interdependencies Between Italy’s Economic Sectors. Critical Infrastructure Protection: Proceedings of the First Annual IFIP Working Group 11.10 International Conference on Critical Infrastructure Protection. IFIP. Springer: Hanover, 253, 311–321. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-75462-8_22
  30. Andrijcic, E., Horowitz, B. (2006). A Macro-Economic Framework for Evaluation of Cyber Security Risks Related to Protection of Intellectual Property. Risk Analysis, 26 (4), 907–923. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00787.x
  31. Haimes, Y. Y., Chittester, C. G. (2005). A Roadmap for Quantifying the Efficacy of Risk Management of Information Security and Interdependent SCADA Systems. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2 (2). doi: http://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1117
  32. Crowther, K. G. (2008). Decentralized risk management for strategic preparedness of critical infrastructure through decomposition of the inoperability input–output model. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 1, 53–67. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2008.08.009
  33. Tanaka, H. (2009). Quantitative Analysis of Information Security Interdependency between Industrial Sectors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2009). Lake Buena Vista: IEEE Computer Society Press, 574–583. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/esem.2009.5314218
  34. Lian, C., Haimes, Y. Y. (2006). Managing the risk of terrorism to interdependent infrastructure systems through the dynamic inoperability input–output model. Systems Engineering, 9 (3), 241–258. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/sys.20051
  35. Barker, K., Santos, J. R. (2010). Measuring the efficacy of inventory with a dynamic input–output model. International Journal of Production Economics, 126 (1), 130–143. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.08.011
  36. Santos, J. R. (2008). Interdependency analysis with multiple probabilistic sector inputs. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 4 (3), 489–510. doi: http://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2008.4.489
  37. Jung, J. (2009). Probabilistic Extension to the Inoperability Input-Output Model: P-IIM. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.
  38. Santos, J. R., Haimes, Y. Y., Lian, C. (2007). A Framework for Linking Cybersecurity Metrics to the Modeling of Macroeconomic Interdependencies. Risk Analysis, 27 (5), 1283–1297. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00957.x
  39. Nieuwenhuijs, A., Luiijf, E., Klaver, M.; Papa, M., Shenoi, S. (Eds.) (2008). Modeling Dependencies In Critical Infrastructures. Critical Infrastructure Protection II: Proceedings of the Second Annual IFIP Working Group 11.10 International Conference on Critical Infrastructure Protection. IFIP. Heidelberg: Springer, 290, 205–213. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88523-0_15
  40. Rosato, V., Issacharoff, L., Tiriticco, F., Meloni, S., Porcellinis, S. D., Setola, R. (2008). Modelling interdependent infrastructures using interacting dynamical models. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 4 (1/2), 63–79. doi: http://doi.org/10.1504/ijcis.2008.016092
  41. Panzieri, S., Setola, R. (2008). Failures propagation in critical interdependent infrastructures. International Journal of Modelling, Identification and Control, 3 (1), 69–78. doi: http://doi.org/10.1504/ijmic.2008.018186
  42. Oliva, G., Panzieri, S., Setola, R. (2010). Agent-based input-output interdependency model. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 3(2), 76–82. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2010.05.001
  43. Rinaldi, S. M. (2004). Modeling and Simulating Critical Infrastructures and Their Interdependencies. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2004). Big Island: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1–8. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2004.1265180
  44. Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial Dynamics. Waltham: Pegasus Communications, 480.
  45. Forrester, J. W. (1961). Principles of Systems. Waltham: Pegasus Communications.
  46. Gonzalez, J. J., Sarriegi, J. M., Gurrutxaga, A.; Lo´pez, J. (Ed.). A Framework for Conceptualizing Social Engineering Attacks. CRITIS 2006. LNCS. Heidelberg: Springer, 4347, 79–90. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/11962977_7
  47. Sarriegi, J. M., Santos, J., Torres, J. M., Imizcoz, D., Egozcue, E., Liberal, D.: Lopez, J., Hammerli, B. M. (Eds.) (2008). Modeling and Simulating Information Security Management. CRITIS 2007. LNCS. Heidelberg: Springer, 5141, 327–336. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89173-4_27
  48. Pasqualini, D., Witkowski, M. S., Klare, P. C., Patelli, P., Cleland, C. A.; Großler, A., Rouwette, E. A. J. A., Langer, R. S., Rowe, J. I., Yanni, J. M. (Eds.) (2006). A Model for a Water Potable Distribution System and its Impacts resulting from a Water Contamination Scenario. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Nijmegen: Wiley, 99–100.
  49. Bush, B. B., Dauelsberg, L. R., LeClaire, R. J., Powell, D. R., DeLand, S. M., Samsa, M. E. (2005). Critical Infrastructure Protection Decision Support System (CIP/DSS) Project Overview. Tech. Rep. LA-UR-05-1870. Los Alamos: Los Alamos National Laboratory.
  50. LeClaire, R., Bush, B., Dauelsberg, L., Powell, D.; Sterman, J. D., Repenning, N. P., Langer, R. S., Rowe, J. I., Yanni, J. M. (Eds.) (2005). Critical Infrastructure Protection Decision Support System. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Boston: System Dynamics Society, 97.
  51. Dauelsberg, L., Outkin, A.; Sterman, J. D., Repenning, N. P., Langer, R. S., Rowe, J. I., Yanni, J. M. (Eds.) (2005). Modeling Economic Impacts to Critical Infrastructures in a System Dynamics Framework. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Boston: System Dynamics Society, 63.
  52. LeClaire, R., O’Reilly, G.; Sterman, J. D., Repenning, N. P., Langer, R. S., Rowe, J. I., Yanni, J. M. (Eds.) (2005). Leveraging a High Fidelity Switched Network Model to Inform a System Dynamics Model of the Telecommunications Infrastructure. Proceedings of the 23rd In- ternational Conference of the System Dynamics Society. Boston: System Dynamics Society, 97.
  53. Min, H.-S. J., Beyeler, W., Brown, T., Son, Y. J., Jones, A. T. (2007). Toward modeling and simulation of critical national infrastructure interdependencies. IIE Transactions, 39 (1), 57–71. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/07408170600940005
  54. United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Computer Systems Laboratory: Integration Definition for Function Modeling (IDEF0) (1993). United States Draft Federal Information Standard, 183.
  55. Berard, C. (2010). Group Model Building Using System Dynamics: An Analysis of Methodological Frameworks. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 8 (1), 35–45.
  56. Hernantes, J., Lauge, A., Labaka, L., Rich, E. H., Sveen, F. O., Sarriegi, J. M. et. al. (2011). Collaborative Modeling of Awareness in Critical Infrastructure Protection. Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International International Conference on Systems Science (HICSS-44 2011). Koloa: IEEE Press. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2011.113
  57. Bier, V. M., Ferson, S., Haimes, Y. Y., Lambert, J. H., Small, M. J. (2004). Risk of Extreme and Rare Events: Lessons from a Selection of Approaches. Risk Analysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 74–118. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511814662.004
  58. Bier, V. M. (2001). Game Theoretic Models for Critical Infrastructure Protection. Risk Analysis in an Interconnected World.
  59. von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  60. Fudenberg, D., Tirole, J. (1991). Game Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  61. Osborne, M. J., Rubinstein, A. (1994). A Course in Game Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  62. Branzel, R., Dimitrov, D., Tijs, S. (2008). Models in Cooperative Game Theory. Heidelberg: Springer. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77954-4
  63. Haywood, O. G. (1954). Military Decision and Game Theory. Journal of the Operations Research Society of America, 2(4), 365–385. doi: http://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2.4.365 ]
  64. Hamilton, T., Mesic, R. (2004). A Simple Game-Theoretic Approach to Suppression of Enemy Defenses and Other Time Critical Target Analyses. Santa Monica. doi: http://doi.org/10.7249/rb108
  65. Brams, S., Kilgour, M. D. (1988). Game Theory and National Security. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 199.
  66. Burke, D.A. (1999). Towards a Game Theory Model of Information Warfare. Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.
  67. Major, J. A. (2002). Advanced Techniques for Modeling Terrorism Risk. The Journal of Risk Finance, 4 (1), 15–24. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/eb022950
  68. Sandler, T., Arce, D. G. (2003). Terrorism & Game Theory. Simulation & Gaming, 34 (3), 319–337. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/1046878103255492
  69. Sandler, T., Siqueira, K. (2008). Games and Terrorism. Simulation & Gaming, 40 (2), 164–192. doi: http://doi.org/10.1177/1046878108314772
  70. Liu, D., Wang, X., Camp, J. (2008). Game-theoretic modeling and analysis of insider threats. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 1, 75–80. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2008.08.001
  71. Jenelius, E., Westin, J., Holmgren, Å. J. (2010). Critical infrastructure protection under imperfect attacker perception. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 3 (1), 16–26. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2009.10.002
  72. Yoshida, M., Kobayashi, K. (2010). Disclosure Strategies for Critical Infrastructure against Terror Attacks. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Systems Man and Cybernetics (SMC 2010). Istanbul: IEEE Press, 3194–3199. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/icsmc.2010.5642277
  73. Lakdawalla, D.N., Zanjani, G. (2004). Insurance, Self-Protection, and the Economics of Terrorism. Tech. Rep. WR-171-ICJ, RAND Corporation. Santa Monica.
  74. Woo, G. (2002). Quantitative Terrorism Risk Assessment. The Journal of Risk Finance, 4 (1), 7–14. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/eb022949
  75. Bier, V., Oliveros, S., Samuelson, L. (2007). Choosing What to Protect: Strategic Defensive Allocation against an Unknown Attacker. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 9 (4), 563–587. doi: http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9779.2007.00320.x
  76. Bolloba´s, B. (1998). Modern Graph Theory. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Vol. 184. Berlin: Springer.
  77. Bolloba´s, B., Kozma, R., Miklo´s, D. (Eds.) (2008). Handbook of Large-Scale Random Networks. Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies. Vol. 18. Budapest: Ja´nos Bolyai Mathematical Society and Springer. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69395-6
  78. Barabási, A.-L., Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks. Science, 286 (5439), 509–512. doi: http://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509
  79. Albert, R., Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74 (1), 47–97. doi: http://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.74.47
  80. Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The Structure and Function of Complex Networks. SIAM Review, 45 (2), 167–256. doi: http://doi.org/10.1137/s003614450342480
  81. Newman, M., Baraba´si, A. L., Watts, D. J. (Eds.) (2006). The Structure and Dynamics of Networks. Princeton Studies in Complexity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 592.
  82. Flaxman, A. D., Frieze, A. M., Vera, J. (2007). Adversarial Deletion in a Scale-Free Random Graph Process. Combinatorics, Probability and Computing, 16 (2), 261–270. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/s0963548306007681
  83. Albert, R., Jeong, H., Barabási, A.-L. (2000). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406 (6794), 378–382. doi: http://doi.org/10.1038/35019019
  84. Cohen, R., Erez, K., ben-Avraham, D., Havlin, S. (2001). Breakdown of the Internet under Intentional Attack. Physical Review Letters, 86 (16), 3682–3685. doi: http://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.86.3682
  85. Motter, A. E., Lai, Y.-C. (2002). Cascade-based attacks on complex networks. Physical Review E, 66 (6), 378–382. doi: http://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.66.065102
  86. Wang, X., Guan, S., Heng Lai, C. (2009). Protecting infrastructure networks from cost-based attacks. New Journal of Physics, 11 (3), 033006. doi: http://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/3/033006
  87. Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27 (1), 55–71. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008
  88. Barton, D. C., Stamber, K. L. (2000). An Agent-Based Microsimulation of Critical Infrastructure Systems. Tech. Rep. SAND2000-0808C. Sandia National Laboratories. Albuquerque.
  89. North, M.; Sallach, D., Wolsko, T. (Eds.) (2000). Agent-Based Modeling of Complex Infrastructures. Proceedings of the Workshop on Simulation of Social Agents: Architectures and Institutions. ANL/DIS/TM-60. Chicago: University of Chicago and Argonne National Laboratory, 239–250.
  90. Panzieri, S., Setola, R., Ulivi, G. (2004). An Agent Based Simulator for Critical Interdependent Infrastructures. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Critical Infrastructures (CRIS 2004). Grenoble.
  91. Balducelli, C., Bologna, S., Pietro, A. D., Vicoli, G. (2005). Analysing interdependencies of critical infrastructures using agent discrete event simulation. International Journal of Emergency Management, 2 (4), 306–318. doi: http://doi.org/10.1504/ijem.2005.008742
  92. Porcellinis, S. D., Setola, R., Panzieri, S., Ulivi, G. (2008). Simulation of heterogeneous and interdependent critical infrastructures. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 4 (1/2), 110–128. doi: http://doi.org/10.1504/ijcis.2008.016095
  93. Dudenhoeffer, D. D., Permann, M. R., Manic, M. (2006). CIMS: A Framework for Infrastructure Interdependency Modeling and Analysis. Proceedings of the 2006 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC 2006). Phoenix: IEEE Press, 478. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/wsc.2006.323119
  94. Dudenhoeffer, D. D., Permann, M. R., Sussman, E. M. (2002). A Parallel Simulation Framework for Infrastructure Modeling and Analysis. Proceedings of the 34th Winter Simulation Conference (WSC 2002). San Diego: IEEE Press, 1971. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/wsc.2002.1166498
  95. Zhu, G.-Y., Henson, M. A., Megan, L. (2001). Dynamic modeling and linear model predictive control of gas pipeline networks. Journal of Process Control, 11 (2), 129–148. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-1524(00)00044-5
  96. Han, Z. Y., Weng, W. G. (2010). An integrated quantitative risk analysis method for natural gas pipeline network. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 23 (3), 428–436. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2010.02.003
  97. Wolthusen, S. D. (2005). GIS-based Command and Control Infrastructure for Critical Infrastructure Protection. Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Critical Infrastructure Protection (IWCIP 2005), 40–47. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/iwcip.2005.12
  98. Patterson, S. A., Apostolakis, G. E. (2007). Identification of critical locations across multiple infrastructures for terrorist actions. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 92 (9), 1183–1203. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2006.08.004
  99. Yevseiev, S., Korolyov, R., Tkachov, A., Laptiev, O., Opirskyy, I., Soloviova, O. (2020). Modification of the algorithm (OFM) S-box, which provides increasing crypto resistance in the post-quantum period. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(5), 8725–8729. doi:10.30534/ijatcse/2020/261952020
  100. Barabash, O., Laptiev, O., Kovtun, O., Leshchenko, O., Dukhnovska, K., Biehun, A. (2020). The Method dynavic TF-IDF. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8 (9), 5712–5718. doi: http://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/130892020
  101. Barabash, O., Laptiev, O., Tkachev, V., Maystrov, O., Krasikov, O., Polovinkin, I. (2020). The Indirect method of obtaining Estimates of the Parameters of Radio Signals of covert means of obtaining Information. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8 (8), 4133–4139. doi: http://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/17882020
  102. Savchenko, V., Ilin, O., Hnidenko, N., Tkachenko, O., Laptiev, O., Lehominova, S. (2020). Detection of Slow DDoS Attacks based on User’s Behavior Forecasting. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8 (5), 2019–2025. doi: http://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/90852020
  103. Berkman, L., Barabash, O., Tkachenko, O., Musienko, A., Laptiev, O., Salanda, I. (2020). The Intelligent Control System for infocommunication networks. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8 (5), 1920–1925. doi: http://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/73852020
  104. Laptiev, O., Shuklin, G., Hohonianc, S., Zidan, A., Salanda, I. (2019). Dynamic model of Ceber Defence Diagnostics of information Systems with the Use of Fozzy Technologies IEEE ATIT 2019 Conference Proceedings. Kyiv, 116–120. doi: http://doi.org/10.1109/atit49449.2019.9030465
  105. Laptiev, O., Stefurak, O., Polovinkin, I., Barabash, O., Savchenko, V., Zelikovska, O. (2020). The method of improving the signal detection quality by accounting for interference. 2020 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Advanced Trends in Information Theory (IEEE ATIT 2020) Conference Proceedings. Kyiv, 172–176.
  106. Laptiev, O., Savchenko, V., Yevseiev, S., Haidur, H., Gakhov, S., Hohoniants, S. (2020). The new method for detecting signals of means of covert obtaining information. 2020 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Advanced Trends in Information Theory (IEEE ATIT 2020) Conference Proceedings. Kyiv, 176–181.
  107. Sobchuk, V., Pichkur, V., Barabash, O., Laptiev O., Kovalchuk, I., Zidan, A. (2020). Algorithm of control of functionally stable manufacturing processes of enterprises. 2020 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Advanced Trends in Information Theory (IEEE ATIT 2020) Conference Proceedings. Kyiv, 206–211.
  108. Savchenko, V., Laptiev, O., Kolos O., Lisnevskyi R., Ivannikova V., Ablazov, I. (2020). Hidden Transmitter Localization Accuracy Model Based on Multi-Position Range Measurement. 2020 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Advanced Trends in Information Theory (IEEE ATIT 2020) Conference Proceedings Kyiv, 246–251.
  109. Yevseiev, S., Ponomarenko, V., Ponomarenko, V., Rayevnyeva, O., Rayevnyeva, O. (2017). Assessment of functional efficiency of a corporate scientific­educational network based on the comprehensive indicators of quality of service. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (2 (90)), 4–15. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.118329
  110. Yevseiev, S., Tsyhanenko, O., Ivanchenko, S., Aleksiyev, V., Verheles, D., Volkov, S. et. al. (2018). Practical implementation of the Niederreiter modified crypto­code system on truncated elliptic codes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (4 (96)), 24–31. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.150903
  111. Yevseiev, S., Tsyhanenko, O., Gavrilova, A., Guzhva, V., Milov, O., Moskalenko, V. et. al. (2019). Development of Niederreiter hybrid crypto-code structure on flawed codes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (9 (97)), 27–38. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.156620
  112. Tsyhanenko, O., Yevseiev, S., Milevskyi, S. (2019). Using the Flawed Codes In Niederreiter Crypto-Code Structure. Short Paper Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intellectual Systems and Information Technologies (ISIT 2019). Odessa, 17–19.
  113. Yevseiev, S., Kots, H., Minukhin, S., Korol, O., Kholodkova, A. (2017). The development of the method of multifactor authentication based on hybrid crypto­code constructions on defective codes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (9 (89)), 19–35. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.109879
  114. Yevseiev, S., Korol, O., Kots, H. (2017). Construction of hybrid security systems based on the crypto-code structures and flawed codes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (9 (88)), 4–21. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.108461

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Yevseiev, S., Melenti, Y., Voitko, O., Hrebeniuk, V., Korchenko, A. ., Mykus, S., Milov, O. ., Prokopenko, O., Sievierinov О., & Chopenko, D. (2021). Development of a concept for building a critical infrastructure facilities security system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(9(111), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.233533

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 9(111) (2021): Information and controlling system

Section

Information and controlling system

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Serhii Yevseiev, Yevgen Melenti, Oleksandr Voitko, Vitalii Hrebeniuk, Anna Korchenko, Serhii Mykus, Oleksandr Milov, Oleksandr Prokopenko, Оleksandr Sievierinov, Dmytro Chopenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.