Re-designing of railway carriages to increase ergonomic and accessible: a case study of indonesian railway

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.253415

Keywords:

house of quality (HoQ), accessible train design, ergonomics, visual impairments

Abstract

Train is a high efficiency mass transportation which is suitable to increase life quality and support of high citizen mobility. The purpose of this paper is to produce some recommendations of improved railway carriage design which are accessible for disabilities, ergonomics and economics. Firstly, the research started with theoretical studies on the product design development, House of Quality (HoQ), visual displays design, anthropometry, and the needs of disabilities. Next step collected data from the open survey and then form the closed survey of 30 respondents who has physical disabilities and visual impairment to understand the passengers’ need. The results of voice of customers shown that an easy access of disabilities people in the carriage has the biggest negative gap between reality and expectation for 1.16 and then following by space availability of wheelchair for 1.10, the seat numbering for visual impairments passengers=0.85, and the ease of emergency aid=0.71. The HoQ provided analysis of room 1 for customer needs, room 2 for voice of team design, room 3 for relationship matrix, room 4 for benchmarking, room 5 for technical benchmarking, room 6 for correlation matrix, and room 7 for weighted importance and relative importance. The QED results shown that the first rank of relatives importance was distance between seat with score=0.618, the second was colour on seat numbering and train series=0.561, and the third was emergency button=0.439. New design recommendation of carriage design should contain of modified seat layouts, improved wheelchair and aisle space, added guiding blocks, emergency assistance buttons, additional folding chairs, and handrail adjustments. Alternative designs were successfully created and able to increase the seat number of the railway coach.

Author Biographies

Sugiono Sugiono, Brawijaya University

Doctor of Ergonomics

Department of Industrial Engineering

Dwi H. Sulistyorini, Brawijaya University

Master of Manufacturing

Department of Industrial Engineering

Nurus Sakinah, Brawijaya University

Bachelor of Industrial Engineering

Department of Industrial Engineering

Willy Satrio Nugroho, Brawijaya University

Doctor of Engineering

Department of Industrial Engineering

References

  1. Sugiono, S., Nurlaela, S., Kusuma, A., Wicaksono, A., Lukodono, R. P. (2021). Investigating the Noise Barrier Impact on Aerodynamics Noise: Case Study at Jakarta MRT. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 189–197. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4409-5_17
  2. Nurdden, A., O.K. Rahma, R. A., Ismail, A. (2007). Effect of Transportation Policies on Modal Shift from Private Car to Public Transport in Malaysia. Journal of Applied Sciences, 7 (7), 1013–1018. doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2007.1013.1018
  3. Bissell, D. (2010). Passenger Mobilities: Affective Atmospheres and the Sociality of Public Transport. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28 (2), 270–289. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/d3909
  4. Bezyak, J. L., Sabella, S. A., Gattis, R. H. (2017). Public Transportation: An Investigation of Barriers for People With Disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 28 (1), 52–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1044207317702070
  5. Wasfi, R., Steinmetz-Wood, M., Levinson, D. (2017). Measuring the transportation needs of people with developmental disabilities: A means to social inclusion. Disability and Health Journal, 10 (2), 356–360. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.10.008
  6. Carreira, R., Patrício, L., Natal Jorge, R., Magee, C. (2014). Understanding the travel experience and its impact on attitudes, emotions and loyalty towards the transportation provider–A quantitative study with mid-distance bus trips. Transport Policy, 31, 35–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.11.006
  7. Sze, N. N., Christensen, K. M. (2017). Access to urban transportation system for individuals with disabilities. IATSS Research, 41 (2), 66–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2017.05.002
  8. Simanjuntak, J. (2021). Policy on Fulfilling the Rights of Persons with Disabilities in Indonesia: Quo Vadis? IJDS: Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 8 (01), 211–277. doi: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijds.2021.008.01.16
  9. Sugiono, S., Widhayanuriyawan, D., Andriyani, D. P. (2018). Mental Stress Evaluation of Car Driver in Different Road Complexity Using Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Analysis. Proceedings of the 2018 5th International Conference on Bioinformatics Research and Applications. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3309129.3309145
  10. Church, R. L., Marston, J. R. (2003). Measuring Accessibility for People with a Disability. Geographical Analysis, 35 (1), 83–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/geo.2002.0029
  11. Tamba, J. (2017). A Juridical Study toward Indonesian Disabilities Right for Public Services Accessibility according to Law No. 8 Year 2016. IJDS : Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 4 (1), 63–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijds.2017.004.01.9
  12. Sallehuddin, M. S., Ramli, M. Z., Mohamad, D., Ismail, N. (2015). Assessment Of Accessibility For Disabled Persons In Rail Transit Stations In Klang Valley. International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering.
  13. Irtema, H. I. M., Ismail, A., Borhan, M. N., Das, A. M., Alshetwi, A. B. Z. (2018). Case study of the behavioural intentions of public transportation passengers in Kuala Lumpur. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 6 (4), 462–474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.05.007
  14. Morton, C., Caulfield, B., Anable, J. (2016). Customer perceptions of quality of service in public transport: Evidence for bus transit in Scotland. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 4 (3), 199–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2016.03.002
  15. Tamba, J. (2018). Exploring the accessibility and facility in railway station used by persons with disabilities: an experience from kebayoran railway station, Jakarta. IJDS:Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 5 (1), 37–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijds.2018.005.01.4
  16. Prasertsubpakij, D., Nitivattananon, V. (2012). Evaluating accessibility to Bangkok Metro Systems using multi-dimensional criteria across user groups. IATSS Research, 36 (1), 56–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2012.02.003
  17. Jiwa, M. I., Armstrong, S., Shao, Y., Lunsky, Y. (2020). Development of educational modules for MRTs to better support patients with intellectual and developmental disabilities undergoing imaging procedures: A collaborative patient-oriented initiative. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 51 (4), S26–S30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2020.08.017
  18. Oliveira, L., Bruen, C., Birrell, S., Cain, R. (2019). What passengers really want: Assessing the value of rail innovation to improve experiences. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 1, 100014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100014
  19. Gumasing, M. J. J., Zerrudo, M. O. V., German, J. D. (2019). An ergonomic design of Light Rail Transit (LRT) in the Philippines for persons with special needs. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Available at: http://www.ieomsociety.org/ieom2019/papers/236.pdf
  20. Sugiono, S., Satrio N, W., Anggara, T., Nurlaela, S., Kusuma, A., Wicaksono, A., Lukodono, R. P. (2021). Implementation of non-pharmaceutical intervention of COVID-19 in MRT through engineering controlled queue line using participatory ergonomics approach. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, 6, 121–138. doi: https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2021.001923
  21. Mulay, R. V., Gangwal, A., Shyam, A. K., Sancheti, P. K. (2019). Prevalence and risk factors for work related musculoskeletal disorders in flight attendants. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health, 6 (6), 2456. doi: https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20192304
  22. Gumasing, M. J. J., Villapando, A. C., Abalajon, A. P. P. (2020). An Ergonomic Design of Passenger Cabin for Public Utility Jeepney. Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Management Science and Industrial Engineering. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3396743.3396796
  23. Sugiono, S., Nurlaela, S., Kusuma, A., Wicaksono, A., Lukodono, R. P. (2020). Impact of elevated outdoor MRT station towards passenger thermal comfort: A case study in Jakarta MRT. Scientific Review Engineering and Environmental Studies (SREES), 29 (1), 93–107. doi: https://doi.org/10.22630/pniks.2020.29.1.9
  24. Paudel, M., Lim, L. J., Yap, F. F., Kho, K. (2021). Vibration Analysis of the Third Rail Structure of a Mass Rapid Transit System with Structural Defects. Applied Sciences, 11 (18), 8410. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188410
  25. Liang, H.-W., Hwang, Y.-H. (2016). Mobile Phone Use Behaviors and Postures on Public Transportation Systems. PLOS ONE, 11 (2), e0148419. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148419
  26. Hvinden, B. (2012). Disability. The Routledge Handbook of the Welfare State, 393–402. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203084229-44
  27. Sapuan, S. M. (2017). Concurrent Engineering, Product Design, and Development. Composite Materials, 29–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-802507-9.00002-7
  28. French, M. J. (1999). Conceptual Design for Engineers. Springer, 252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3627-9
  29. Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.-H. (2007). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer, 617. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2
  30. Chakrabarti, A. (1995). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design. Materials & Design, 16 (2), 122–123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3069(95)90023-3
  31. Smith, R. P., Morrow, J. A. (1999). Product development process modeling. Design Studies, 20 (3), 237–261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-694x(98)00018-0
  32. Marson, E., Sartor, M. (2019). Quality Function Deployment (QFD). Quality Management: Tools, Methods, and Standards, 77–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78769-801-720191005
  33. Cristiano, J. J., Liker, J. K., White, C. C. I. (2001). Key factors in the successful application of quality function deployment (QFD). IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48 (1), 81–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/17.913168
  34. Franceschini, F., Maisano, D. (2018). A new proposal to improve the customer competitive benchmarking in QFD. Quality Engineering, 30 (4), 730–761. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2018.1437178
  35. Purwanto, A. (2020). Design of Food Product Using Quality Function Deployment in Food Industry. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research (JIEMAR), 1 (1b), 1–16. Available at: https://www.jiemar.org/index.php/jiemar/article/view/20
  36. Chan, L.-K., Wu, M.-L. (2005). A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example. Omega, 33 (2), 119–139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.010
  37. Park, T., Kim, K.-J. (1998). Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality. Journal of Operations Management, 16 (5), 569–581. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(97)00029-6
  38. Maritan, D. (2015). Practical Manual of Quality Function Deployment. Springer, 190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08521-0
  39. Lingqvist, L. (2012). Railway Stations - Planning Manual. Borlange: The Swedish Transport Administration. Available at: https://trafikverket.ineko.se/Files/sv-SE/44463/Ineko.Product.RelatedFiles/2018_052_railway_stations_planning_manual.pdf
  40. Sundstrup, E., Jakobsen, M. D., Andersen, C. H., Jay, K., Persson, R., Aagaard, P., Andersen, L. L. (2013). Participatory ergonomic intervention versus strength training on chronic pain and work disability in slaughterhouse workers: study protocol for a single-blind, randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-67
  41. Carrington, P., Hurst, A., Kane, S. K. (2014). Wearables and chairables. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557237

Downloads

Published

2022-08-31

How to Cite

Sugiono, S., Sulistyorini, D. H., Sakinah, N., & Nugroho, W. S. (2022). Re-designing of railway carriages to increase ergonomic and accessible: a case study of indonesian railway . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(1 (118), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.253415

Issue

Section

Engineering technological systems