Creating incentives for managing construction waste generated during the war

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.265646

Keywords:

construction waste, waste management, waste recycling incentives

Abstract

The object of this study is a system of incentives aimed at activating the processes to manage construction waste formed during hostilities.

The problem being solved is to form incentives for the growth of economic interest in construction waste management.

The structural and functional readiness of the economy for the management of waste generated as a result of hostilities is investigated. It was revealed that 60 % of the participants in the waste management system are microenterprises with a profitability of 0.2 %. The level of construction waste disposal and the level of its reuse are estimated. Forecasts of the behavior of methods of waste management in the absence of changes in state policy have been made. Based on the use of forecasting methods, a trend of increasing the amount of waste dumped at landfills has been identified. The directions of state influence on the formation of economic incentives for the processing of construction waste have been proposed.

A special feature of the study's results is that the inconsistency of existing incentives with the needs of participants in the field of waste management has been investigated. The problem with the activities of small enterprises is the demand for performance, at the formation of which government efforts should be directed. Distinctive features of the results are that they solve the problems of achieving a balance of economic interests of participants in the management of construction waste generated during the war. The area of practical use of the obtained results is the system of state and local management of waste handling activities

Author Biographies

Valentyna Marchenko, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship

Valerii Osetskyi, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economic Theory, Macro- and Microeconomics

Alla Hrechko, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship

Bogdan Dergaliuk, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship

Oksana Kavtysh, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship

Vitaliy Shutyuk, National University of Food Technologies

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Canning Technology

References

  1. Nunes, K., Mahler, C. (2020). Comparison of construction and demolition waste management between Brazil, European Union and USA. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 38 (4), 415–422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x20902814
  2. Ma, M., Tam, V. W. Y., Le, K. N., Li, W. (2020). Challenges in current construction and demolition waste recycling: A China study. Waste Management, 118, 610–625. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.09.030
  3. Srour, I. M., Chehab, G. R., El-Fadel, M., Tamraz, S. (2013). Pilot-based assessment of the economics of recycling construction demolition waste. Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy, 31 (11), 1170–1179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242x13479430
  4. Al-Otaibi, A., Bowan, P. A., Abdel daiem, M. M., Said, N., Ebohon, J. O., Alabdullatief, A., Al-Enazi, E., Watts, G. (2022). Identifying the Barriers to Sustainable Management of Construction and Demolition Waste in Developed and Developing Countries. Sustainability, 14 (13), 7532. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137532
  5. Wu, Z., Yang, K., Xue, H., Zuo, J., Li, S. (2022). Major barriers to information sharing in reverse logistics of construction and demolition waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 350, 131331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131331
  6. Sun, Y., Gu, Z. (2022). Implementation of Construction Waste Recycling under Construction Sustainability Incentives: A Multi-Agent Stochastic Evolutionary Game Approach. Sustainability, 14 (6), 3702. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063702
  7. Su, P., Peng, Y., Hu, Q., Tan, R. (2020). Incentive Mechanism and Subsidy Design for Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling under Information Asymmetry with Reciprocal Behaviors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (12), 4346. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124346
  8. Long, H., Liu, H., Li, X., Chen, L. (2020). An Evolutionary Game Theory Study for Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Considering Green Development Performance under the Chinese Government’s Reward-Penalty Mechanism. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (17), 6303. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176303
  9. Villoria Sáez, P., Osmani, M. (2019). A diagnosis of construction and demolition waste generation and recovery practice in the European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production, 241, 118400. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118400
  10. Antunes, A., Martins, R., Silvestre, J. D., do Carmo, R., Costa, H., Júlio, E., Pedroso, P. (2021). Environmental Impacts and Benefits of the End-of-Life of Building Materials: Database to Support Decision Making and Contribute to Circularity. Sustainability, 13 (22), 12659. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212659
  11. Adams, K. T., Osmani, M., Thorpe, T., Thornback, J. (2017). Circular economy in construction: current awareness, challenges and enablers. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Waste and Resource Management, 170(1), 15–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.16.00011
  12. Nixon, P. J. (1976). The use of materials from demolition in construction. Resources Policy, 2 (4), 276–283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4207(76)90082-9
  13. Khaled, I. N. A., Hanan, S. W. (2007). Reuse of Demolished Building's Debris in Post war Construction An approach to conservation of traditional architecture. Available at: https://khalednabil.net/papers/PostwarConstruction2007.pdf
  14. Kao, S.-Y. (2013). The City Recycled: The Afterlives of Demolished Buildings in Postwar Beijing. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2sw6n612
  15. Al-Mabhouh, M. A., Musalam, A. M. A., Shukri, A., Al-Najjar, H., Abunamous, R. E. S. (2021). Requirements for Managing the Recycling of War Debris in the Gaza Strip. Israa University Journal for Applied Science, 5 (1), 59–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.52865/dqqd6095
  16. Derzhavnyi klasyfikator Ukrainy. Klasyfikator vidkhodiv DK 005-96. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v0089217-96#Text
  17. Utvorennia ta povodzhennia z vidkhodamy I–IV klasiv nebezpeky za katehoriiamy materialiv u 2020 rotsi. Available at: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2018/ns/upvI_IV/arch_upvI_IV_u.html
  18. Recovery rate of construction and demolition waste (2022). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/cei_wm040/default/table?lang=en
  19. Metodolohichni poiasnennia. Available at: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2013/kap/kap_met.htm
  20. Karty Ukrainy. Available at: https://unitar.org/maps/countries/107?page=0
  21. Natsionalna stratehiia upravlinnia vidkhodamy v Ukraini do 2030 roku (2017). Rozporiadzhennia Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy No. 820-r. 08.11.2017. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/820-2017-%D1%80#Text
  22. Klasyfikatsiia vydiv ekonomichnoi diialnosti (2010). Nakaz Derzhspozhyvstandartu Ukrainy No. 457. 11.10.2010. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/vb457609-10#Text
  23. Pro vіdkhodi (1998). Zakon Ukraini No. 187/98. 05.03.1998. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/187/98-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text
  24. Kilkist diiuchykh pidpryiemstv za vydamy ekonomichnoi diialnosti z rozpodilom na velyki, seredni, mali ta mikropidpryiemstva za 2010−2020 roky. Available at: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/menu/menu_u/sze_20.htm
  25. Obsiah vyroblenoi produktsii (tovariv, posluh) pidpryiemstv za vydamy ekonomichnoi diialnosti u 2012–2020 rokakh. Available at: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/menu/menu_u/sze_20.htm
  26. Rentabelnist operatsiinoi ta vsiiei diialnosti pidpryiemstv za vydamy ekonomichnoi diialnosti za 2010–2017 roky. Available at: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2018/fin/rodp/rodp_ed/rodp_ed_u/rodp_ed_1218_u.htm
  27. Utvorennia vidkhodiv za klasyfikatsiinymy uhrupovanniamy derzhavnoho klasyfikatora vidkhodiv u 2020 rotsi. Available at: https://ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2018/ns/uv_zaklass/arch_uv_zaklass_u.htm
  28. Pro upravlinnia vidkhodamy (2022). Zakon Ukrainy No. 2320-IX. 20.06.2022. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2320-20#Text
  29. Stan sfery povodzhennia z pobutovymy vidkhodamy v Ukraini za 2021 rik. Available at: https://www.minregion.gov.ua/napryamki-diyalnosti/zhkh/terretory/stan-sfery-povodzhennya-z-pobutovymy-vidhodamy-v-ukrayini-za-2021-rik/
  30. Patentscope.wipo. Available at: https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/result.jsf?_vid=P10-L5JUK8-08105
Creating incentives for managing construction waste generated during the war

Downloads

Published

2022-10-26

How to Cite

Marchenko, V., Osetskyi, V., Hrechko, A., Dergaliuk, B., Kavtysh, O., & Shutyuk, V. (2022). Creating incentives for managing construction waste generated during the war . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(13 (119), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.265646

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 13 (119) (2022): Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Valentyna Marchenko, Valerii Osetskyi, Alla Hrechko, Bogdan Dergaliuk, Oksana Kavtysh, Vitaliy Shutyuk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.