Identification of combustion regularities of fuel mixtures from Azolla biomass, goat manure biochar and goat manure bio-oil for FCC furnace

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.267274

Keywords:

FCC, biochar, biomass, goat manure, fuel mixture, combustion, Azolla

Abstract

Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) is a method of cracking vegetable oils into simpler fractions and green fuel oils. One component of the FCC system is the FCC furnace. The FCC furnace is where the combustion process occurs and provides high heat transfer throughout the FCC system, especially for heating the reactor. The reactor temperature is the catalyst cracking temperature. The cracking temperature of the catalyst depends on the feed oil used in the cracking process, such as crude palm oil at 450‒550 °C or crude bio-oil at 300 °C. The fuel for heating an FCC furnace is usually coal. To reduce coal, we use a mixture of Azolla microphylla biomass with biochar and bio-oil from goat manure. The aim of this study was to analyze the mixture of Azolla microphylla biomass with biochar and bio-oil from goat manure to obtain sufficient furnace temperature to heat the FCC reactor, perform analytical calculations to obtain the volume of flue gas formed from the combustion reaction. We conducted two experiments; the first experiment used a mixture of 1 kg of Goat Manure Biochar (GMBC) with 0.5 kg of Azolla microphylla and the second experiment used a mixture of one kg of GMBC with 0.5 kg of Azolla microphylla plus 300 ml of Goat Manure Bio-oil (GMBO). A fuel mixture of one kilogram GMBC with 0.5 kg Azolla is not effective in combustion because the maximum temperature in the furnace is 177 °C but the fuel mixture of one kg GMBC, 0.5 kg Azolla and 300 ml GMBO has a furnace temperature of 472.75 °C, which can heat the stripper up to 313.25 °C so that cracking can occur in the raw bio-oil. Analysis of combustion results showed an increase in total CO2 volume from experiment one and experiment two of 0.966

Supporting Agency

  • The authors would like to thank the Directorate of Research and Community Service, Universitas Indonesia, for funding this research project under the PUTI Q3 Program 2022.

Author Biographies

Tanwir Ahmad Farhan, Universitas Indonesia

Magister of Mechanical Engineering Student

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Ahmad Indra Siswantara, Universitas Indonesia

Doctor of Engineering, Lecturer

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Ahmad Syihan Auzani, Universitas Indonesia

Doctor of Engineering, Lecturer

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Adi Syuriadi, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Master of Engineering, Lecturer

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Candra Damis Widiawaty, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Master of Engineering, Lecturer

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Muhammad Hilman Gumelar Syafei, Universitas Indonesia

Master of Engineering, Lecturer

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Iwan Susanto, Politeknik Negeri Jakarta

Doctor of Materials Science and Engineering, Associate Professor

Department of Mechanical Engineering

References

  1. Roni, M. S., Chowdhury, S., Mamun, S., Marufuzzaman, M., Lein, W., Johnson, S. (2017). Biomass co-firing technology with policies, challenges, and opportunities: A global review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 1089–1101. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.023
  2. Agbor, E., Zhang, X., Kumar, A. (2014). A review of biomass co-firing in North America. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, 930–943. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.195
  3. Bhuiyan, A. A., Blicblau, A. S., Islam, A. K. M. S., Naser, J. (2018). A review on thermo-chemical characteristics of coal/biomass co-firing in industrial furnace. Journal of the Energy Institute, 91 (1), 1–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.10.006
  4. Maciejończyk, N., Pełka, G., Luboń, W., Malik, D. (2019). Analysis of the Flue Gas Produced During the Coal and Biomass Co-combustion in a Solid Fuel Boiler. Renewable Energy Sources: Engineering, Technology, Innovation, 239–246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13888-2_23
  5. Syuriadi, A., Siswantara, A. I., Nurhakim, F. R., Irbah, Y. N., Al Rizky, B., Zulfa, F. A. et al. (2022). Analysis of the effect of biomass variants (fish waste, tamanu waste and duckweed) on the characteristics of syngas, bio oil, and carbon charcoal produced in the pyrolysis process. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (6 (117)), 41–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.253750
  6. Sood, A., Uniyal, P. L., Prasanna, R., Ahluwalia, A. S. (2011). Phytoremediation Potential of Aquatic Macrophyte, Azolla. AMBIO, 41 (2), 122–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0159-z
  7. Hamdan, H. Z., Houri, A. F. (2021). CO2 sequestration by propagation of the fast-growing Azolla spp. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (12), 16912–16924. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16986-6
  8. Miranda, A. F., Biswas, B., Ramkumar, N., Singh, R., Kumar, J., James, A. et al. (2016). Aquatic plant Azolla as the universal feedstock for biofuel production. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 9 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0628-5
  9. Golzary, A., Hosseini, A., Saber, M. (2020). Azolla filiculoides as a feedstock for biofuel production: cultivation condition optimization. International Journal of Energy and Water Resources, 5 (1), 85–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42108-020-00092-3
  10. Chouhan, A., Sarma, A. (2013). Critical Analysis of Process Parameters for Bio-oil Production via Pyrolysis of Biomass: A Review. Recent Patents on Engineering, 7 (2), 98–114. doi: https://doi.org/10.2174/18722121113079990005
  11. Pirbazari, S. M., Norouzi, O., Kohansal, K., Tavasoli, A. (2019). Experimental studies on high-quality bio-oil production via pyrolysis of Azolla by the use of a three metallic/modified pyrochar catalyst. Bioresource Technology, 291, 121802. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121802
  12. Prabakaran, S., Mohanraj, T., Arumugam, A., Sudalai, S. (2022). A state-of-the-art review on the environmental benefits and prospects of Azolla in biofuel, bioremediation and biofertilizer applications. Industrial Crops and Products, 183, 114942. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114942
  13. Dewanto, M. A. R., Januartrika, A. A., Dewajani, H., Budiman, A. (2017). Catalytic and thermal cracking processes of waste cooking oil for bio-gasoline synthesis. AIP Conference Proceedings. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4978172
  14. Makertihartha, I. G. B. N., Fitradi, R. B., Ramadhani, A. R., Laniwati, M., Muraza, O., Subagjo (2020). Biogasoline Production from Palm Oil: Optimization of Catalytic Cracking Parameters. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45 (9), 7257–7266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04354-4
  15. Wibowo, S., Efiyanti, L., Pari, G. (2020). Catalytic and Thermal Cracking of Bio-Oil from Oil-Palm Empty Fruit Bunches, in Batch Reactor. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry, 20 (5), 1000. doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.44076
  16. Bhuiyan, A. A., Naser, J. (2015). Computational modelling of co-firing of biomass with coal under oxy-fuel condition in a small scale furnace. Fuel, 143, 455–466. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.089
  17. Zhao, J., Deng, J., Song, J., Shu, C.-M. (2019). Effectiveness of a high-temperature-programmed experimental system in simulating particle size effects on hazardous gas emissions in bituminous coal. Safety Science, 115, 353–361. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.008
  18. Poddar, S., Sarat Chandra Babu, J. (2021). Modelling and optimization of a pyrolysis plant using swine and goat manure as feedstock. Renewable Energy, 175, 253–269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.04.120
  19. Pourkarimi, S., Hallajisani, A., Alizadehdakhel, A., Nouralishahi, A. (2021). Bio-oil production by pyrolysis of Azolla filiculoides and Ulva fasciata macroalgae. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 7 (3), 331–346. doi: https://doi.org/10.22034/GJESM.2021.03.02
  20. Touray, N., Tsai, W.-T., Chen, H.-R., Liu, S.-C. (2014). Thermochemical and pore properties of goat-manure-derived biochars prepared from different pyrolysis temperatures. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 109, 116–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.07.004
  21. Erdogdu, A. E., Polat, R., Ozbay, G. (2019). Pyrolysis of goat manure to produce bio-oil. Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, 22 (2), 452–457. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2018.11.002
  22. Type K Thermocouple. Available at: http://www.thermocoupleinfo.com/type-k-thermocouple.htm
  23. Septiana, R. et al. (2019). Calibration of K-Type Thermocouple and MAX6675 Module with Reference DS18B20 Thermistor Based on Arduino DAQ. Prosiding SNTTM XVIII. Available at: http://prosiding.bkstm.org/prosiding/2019/PTM01.pdf
  24. Paraschiv, L. S., Serban, A., Paraschiv, S. (2020). Calculation of combustion air required for burning solid fuels (coal / biomass / solid waste) and analysis of flue gas composition. Energy Reports, 6, 36–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.10.016
Identification of combustion regularities of fuel mixtures from Azolla biomass, goat manure biochar and goat manure bio-oil for FCC furnace

Downloads

Published

2023-02-28

How to Cite

Farhan, T. A., Siswantara, A. I., Auzani, A. S., Syuriadi, A., Widiawaty, C. D., Syafei, M. H. G., & Susanto, I. (2023). Identification of combustion regularities of fuel mixtures from Azolla biomass, goat manure biochar and goat manure bio-oil for FCC furnace. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(6 (121), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.267274

Issue

Section

Technology organic and inorganic substances