Development of the comprehensive method of situation management of project risks based on big data technology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.274473

Keywords:

comprehensive method, situational risk management, fuzzy situational graph, goal achievement index

Abstract

Project implementation is often carried out under the influence of negative changes in the environment and circumstances characterized as crisis. Therefore, the processes associated with risk management, which is the object of this study, are becoming important. The topic of this study is to increase the efficiency of projects by adapting the project to crisis conditions, promptly developing and making effective management decisions. For projects, it is necessary not only to identify the current situation as risky but also to determine rational ways to achieve the project goals under crisis conditions. Therefore, a comprehensive method of situational project risk management based on the combined application of situational analysis methods, intelligent and expert methods, as well as Big Data technology, is proposed. Within the framework of the method, a project risk management model has been built in the form of a fuzzy situational graph, which would provide a choice of strategies that could contribute to overcoming a risky situation, as well as reduce the time to make effective management decisions in crisis circumstances. The result of this method is compliance with time constraints, reducing resource overruns and losses in the project, as well as adapting to rapidly changing circumstances and adequate response.

A comprehensive method of situational project risk management is characterized by solving the task toformalize management decision-making procedures and their information support, taking into account the availability of both structured and unstructured data. The proposed procedure for situational project risk management based on the use of Big Data technology can also be the basis of project management information technology and the corresponding decision support system

Author Biographies

Tetiana Prokopenko, Cherkasy State Technological University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Information Technology Design

Yevhen Lanskykh, Cherkasy State Technological University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Information Technology Design

Valentyn Prokopenko, Cherkasy State Technological University

Postgraduate Student

Department of Information Technology Design

Oleksandr Pidkuiko, Cherkasy State Technological University

Postgraduate Student

Department of Information Technology Design

Yaroslav Tarasenko, Cherkasy State Technological University

PhD

Department of Information Technology Design

References

  1. Prokopenko, T., Grigor, O. (2018). Development of the comprehensive method to manage risks in projects related to information technologies. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (3 (92)), 37–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.128140
  2. McCarthy, J., Hayes, P. (1969). Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. Available at: https://www-formal.stanford.edu/jmc/mcchay69.pdf
  3. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (2013). Project Management Institute, 589. Available at: https://ceulearning.ceu.edu/pluginfile.php/305454/course/overviewfiles/PMBOKGuide_5th_Ed.pdf?forcedownload=1
  4. Benov, D. M. (2016). The Manhattan Project, the first electronic computer and the Monte Carlo method. Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, 22 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/mcma-2016-0102
  5. Leha, Yu. H., Prokopenko, T. O., Danchenko, O. B. (2010). Ekspertni protsedury ta metody pryiniattia rishen v investytsiinykh proektakh. Visnyk ChDTU, 2, 69–73.
  6. Verma, K. K., Ospanova, A. (2022). Risk Management. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science Engineering and Technology, 11 (12), 14315.
  7. Odubuasi, A. C., Osuagwu, O. V. A., Oby, B. (2021). Effect of Risk Management Committee and Enterprise Risk Management on Performance of Banks in Nigeria. JETMASE, 3 (1), 222–233. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366187232_Effect_of_Risk_Management_Committee_and_Effect_of_Risk_Management_Committee_and_Enterprise_Risk_Management_on_Performance_of_Banks_in_Nigeria
  8. Petyk, L. O., Baskova, Y. S. (2022). The Problems of Financial Risks Management in the Risk Management System and the Methods for Solving. Business Inform, 10 (537), 181–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2022-10-181-186
  9. Hong, Y. (Bright), Ly, M., Lin, H. (2022). RPA Risk Management: Points to Consider. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting. doi: https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-2022-004
  10. Ladanyuk, A., Prokopenko, T., Reshetiuk, V. (2014). The model of strategic management of organizational and technical systems, taking into account risk-based cognitive approach. Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW Agriculture (Agricultural and Forest Enginweering), 63, 97–104.
  11. Ladanyuk, A. P., Shumygai, D. A., Boiko, R. O. (2013). Situational Coordination of Continuous Technological Complexes Subsystems. Journal of Automation and Information Sciences, 45 (8), 68–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1615/jautomatinfscien.v45.i8.70
  12. Lohani, A. K., Goel, N. K., Bhatia, K. K. S. (2010). Comparative study of neural network, fuzzy logic and linear transfer function techniques in daily rainfall-runoff modelling under different input domains. Hydrological Processes, 25 (2), 175–193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7831
  13. Lynch, C. (2008). How do your data grow? Nature, 455 (7209), 28–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/455028a
  14. Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R. R., Zadeh, L. A. (Eds.) (1991). Uncertainty in Knowledge Bases. Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0028090
  15. Prokopenko, T. O., Ladaniuk, A. P. (2015). Informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi upravlinnia orhanizatsiyno-tekhnolohichnymy systemamy. Cherkasy: Vertykal, vydavets Kandych S.H., 224.
  16. Taber, W. R. (1994). Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Model Social Systems. Artificial Intelligence Expert, 9, 18–23.
  17. Chochowski, I., Chernyshenko, V., Kozyrskyi, V., Kyshenko, A., Ladaniuk, V., Lysenko, V. et at. (2014). Innovative energy-saving technologies in biotechnological objects control. Kyiv: Tsentr Uchbovoii Literatury, 240.
  18. Zedeh, L. A. (1989). Knowledge representation in fuzzy logic. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 1 (1), 89–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/69.43406
  19. Diestel, R. (2005). Graph Theory. Electronic Edition. Springer-Verlag. Available at: https://sites.math.washington.edu/~billey/classes/562.winter.2018/articles/GraphTheory.pdf
  20. Prokopenko, T., Lavdanska, O., Povolotskyi, Y., Obodovskyi, B., Tarasenko, Y. (2021). Devising an integrated method for evaluating the efficiency of scrum-based projects in the field of information technology. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (3 (113)), 46–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.242744
Development of the comprehensive method of situation management of project risks based on big data technology

Downloads

Published

2023-02-28

How to Cite

Prokopenko, T., Lanskykh, Y., Prokopenko, V., Pidkuiko, O., & Tarasenko, Y. (2023). Development of the comprehensive method of situation management of project risks based on big data technology. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(3 (121), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.274473

Issue

Section

Control processes