Determining possibilities for applying theoretical principles of situational risk management in the aviation safety system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.294763

Keywords:

risk management, aviation safety, situational management, frame structure, drama technology, human factor, nuclear language, area of acceptable risk, reactive, proactive, predictive management methods

Abstract

Aviation safety is one of the main criteria for its sustainable development. The object of this study is safety risk management, which is the main tool of the aviation safety management system. The problem that needs to be further solved is the improvement of aviation risk management methods under war, force majeure, and crisis conditions, as well as under conditions of uncertainty, when there is a minimum of time to make a single correct decision. The theory of situational management can be chosen as the theoretical basis for creating decision-making systems. The development of special languages for describing the situation arising at the control object, as well as in its control system, makes it possible to correctly represent the models of control objects and the evolution of knowledge about them. The work solves the task of building a model of the control object, which takes into account the maximum number of its features suitable for implementation. In order to represent the management object based on the method of expert assessments, the weighting coefficients of the risk characteristics’ probabilities and the values of the weighting coefficients of the degrees of severity were calculated, a matrix of risk assessment indicators was built, and risk assessment criteria were developed. Based on the calculations, general approaches to aviation safety risk management were specified. The paper developed a «dramatic script» of an episode of aviation security risk management, which includes the stages of the episode, the content of necessary actions, the corresponding stages of aviation security risk management and the corresponding aviation security risk management. The content of the management itself consists in preventing the transition from the zone of acceptable risk to the zone of permissible and from the zone of permissible risk to the zone of unacceptable risk, as well as the implementation of measures to stimulate the transition from the zone of unacceptable to the zone of permissible risk and from the zone of permissible to the zone of acceptable risk

Author Biographies

Dmytro Bugayko, National Aviation University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Corresponding member of the Academy of Economic Sciences of Ukraine

Department of Logistics

Oleksandr Ponomarenko, National Aviation University

PhD, Associate Professor

Dean

Faculty of Cybersecurity and Software Engineering

Nataliya Sokolova, National Aviation University

PhD

Department of Automation and Energy Management

Oleg Leshchinsky, College of Engineering, Management and Land Management of the National Aviation University

PhD, Associate Professor

Committee of Mathematical Disciplines

References

  1. Kharazishvili, Y., Kwilinski, A., Bugayko, D., Hryhorak, M., Butorina, V., Yashchyshyna, I. (2022). Strategic Scenarios of the Post-War Recovery of the Aviation Transport Sustainable Development: The Case of Ukraine. Virtual Economics, 5 (3), 7–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2022.05.03(1)
  2. Mendes, N., Geraldo Vidal Vieira, J., Patrícia Mano, A. (2022). Risk management in aviation maintenance: A systematic literature review. Safety Science, 153, 105810. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105810
  3. Patriarca, R., Di Gravio, G., Cioponea, R., Licu, A. (2019). Safety intelligence: Incremental proactive risk management for holistic aviation safety performance. Safety Science, 118, 551–567. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.040
  4. Yang, C., Huang, C. (2023). Natural Language Processing (NLP) in Aviation Safety: Systematic Review of Research and Outlook into the Future. Aerospace, 10 (7), 600. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace10070600
  5. Bendak, S., Rashid, H. S. J. (2020). Fatigue in aviation: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 76, 102928. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102928
  6. Li, C., Sun, R., Pan, X. (2023). Takeoff runway overrun risk assessment in aviation safety based on human pilot behavioral characteristics from real flight data. Safety Science, 158, 105992. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105992
  7. Wu, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, X., Lu, Y., Xiong, Z. (2023). Analysis on coupling dynamic effect of human errors in aviation safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 192, 107277. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2023.107277
  8. Zhang, X., Mahadevan, S. (2021). Bayesian network modeling of accident investigation reports for aviation safety assessment. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 209, 107371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107371
  9. Zhang, X., Mahadevan, S. (2019). Ensemble machine learning models for aviation incident risk prediction. Decision Support Systems, 116, 48–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2018.10.009
  10. Hamza, M. H., Polichshuk, R., Lee, H., Parker, P., Campbell, A., Chattopadhyay, A. (2022). Aircraft post-upset flight risk region prediction for aviation safety management. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 54, 101804. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101804
  11. Christensen, O., Goh, S. S. (2021). Explicit construction of frames and pairs of dual frames on locally compact abelian groups. Sampling Theory, Signal Processing, and Data Analysis, 19 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43670-021-00004-4
  12. Sanjitha, R., Thankachan, B. (2024). Aggregation operators on multiple sets and its application in decision-making problems. Global and Stochastic Analysis, 11 (1), 81–94.
  13. Massit, H., Rossafi, M., Park, C. (2023). Some relations between continuous generalized frames. Afrika Matematika, 35 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13370-023-01157-2
  14. Pospelov, D. A. (1991). Situational Control: Theory and Practice. Battelle Memorial Institute, 344.
  15. Doc 9859. Safety Management Manual. International Civil Aviation Organization. Available at: https://skybrary.aero/sites/default/files/bookshelf/5863.pdf
  16. Leshchynskyi, O. L., Shkolnyi, O. V. (2005). Ekonomichnyi ryzyk ta metody yoho vymiriuvannia. Kyiv: Delta, 112.
  17. Visual Glide Slope Indicators. Available at: https://www.cfinotebook.net/notebook/aircraft-operations/terminal/visual-glide-slope-indicators
  18. Minsky, M. (1974). A Framework for Representing Knowledge. Available at: https://courses.media.mit.edu/2004spring/mas966/Minsky%201974%20Framework%20for%20knowledge.pdf
Determining possibilities for applying theoretical principles of situational risk management in the aviation safety system

Downloads

Published

2023-12-28

How to Cite

Bugayko, D., Ponomarenko, O., Sokolova, N., & Leshchinsky, O. (2023). Determining possibilities for applying theoretical principles of situational risk management in the aviation safety system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(3 (126), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.294763

Issue

Section

Control processes