Defining directions for improving regulation of private law forms of technology transfer in the European Union

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.305366

Keywords:

legal regulation of technologies, forms of technology transfer, unification of forms of transfer, financing of innovations

Abstract

The object of this study is the existing regulatory approaches to the definition of private law forms of technology transfer in the law of the European Union, international treaties, and agreements.

In the course of research and generalization of existing concepts, it was established that they are not unified and differ significantly. It has been proven that this does not meet the needs of technology transfer participants and destabilizes the technology transfer process. The expediency of improving the existing concept of defining private law forms of technology transfer by unifying them has been substantiated. Recommendations on the list of the main forms of technology transfer have been formed based on a systematic analysis of regulatory legal acts that determine the content of technology. A classification of the main private law forms of technology transfer has been proposed. Three main groups of private law forms of technology transfer were distinguished. The expediency of assigning each private law form of transfer to a certain group was substantiated. Directions for improving the current regulation of private law forms of technology transfer have been formed, by summarizing and supplementing them. The need to make changes to the provisions of such international treaties and agreements as the World Trade Organization Agreements, the Recommendations of the World Organization for the Protection of Intellectual Property, the Oslo Guidelines, the UNCTAD Recommendations, and the framework program "Horizon Europe" has been proven.

The research was aimed at the formation of general theoretical foundations for the improvement of regulatory methods of identification of private law forms of technology transfer. The research results can be used in the formation of international normative acts, recommendations of international institutions, acts of national legislation and serve as a basis for further scientific research on these issues

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Davydiuk, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Business Law

Bohdan Hnatkivskyi, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Professor

Department of Finance, Money Circulation and Credit

Vitalii Usatyi, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

PhD, Assistant

Department of Business Law

Igor Borysov, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

PhD, Assistant

Department of Business Law

Nina Stetsenko, Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University

PhD, Senior Lecturer

Department of History of State and Law of Ukraine and Foreign Countries

References

  1. Rocha, A., Romero, F., Cruz-Cunha, M. (2022). University technology transfer: Contacts and connections at the origin of licensing agreements. Procedia Computer Science, 204, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.08.010
  2. Grønhaug, K. (1989). Knowledge transfer: The case of the Norwegian technology agreements. Omega, 17 (3), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(89)90032-7
  3. Vasić, A. (2020). Legal treatment of grant-back clauses in licence agreements from the aspect of EU competition law. Zbornik Radova Pravnog Fakulteta Nis, 59 (89), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn0-29303
  4. Battistella, C., Ferraro, G., Pessot, E. (2023). Technology transfer services impacts on open innovation capabilities of SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122875
  5. Klein, M. A. (2022). Patents, trade secrets and international technology transfer. Economics Letters, 210, 110180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110180
  6. Bozeman, B., Rimes, H., Youtie, J. (2015). The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Research Policy, 44 (1), 34–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.06.008
  7. Samuel, K. L. H., Chai, C. G. (2018). Closing the ‘Intangible Technology Transfer’ Gap within the Existing Legal Frameworks: Time for an Additional Protocol(s)? Groningen Journal of International Law, 6 (1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.21827/5b51d53eb39b2
  8. Ribeiro, M. C. P., Rocha Jr, W. F. da, Czelusniak, V. A. (2017). Mecanismos jurídicos e econômicos para a transferência de tecnologia: um estudo de caso. Revista Direito GV, 13 (1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172201703
  9. Heidegger, M. (1954). Die Frage nach der Technik. München: Die Künste im technischen Zeitalter, 70–108. Available at: https://www.bard.edu/library/arendt/pdfs/Heidegger-Frage.pdf
  10. Dunning, J. H. (2002). Theories and Paradigms of International Business Activity. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843767053
  11. Casson, M. (2010). Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805155
  12. Kojima, K. (1977). Transfer of Technology to Developing Countries -Japanese Type versus American Type-. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 17 (2). https://doi.org/10.15057/7979
  13. TRIPS — Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. WTO. Available at: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/trips_e.htm
  14. Exchanging Value - Negotiating Technology Licensing Agreements: A Training Manual (2005). International Trade Centre (ITC). WIPO. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/licensing/906/wipo_pub_906.pdf
  15. Draft international code of conduct on the transfer of technology (1988). Geneva. Available at: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/50095?ln=ru&v=pdf
  16. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. https://doi.org/10.1787/24132764
  17. Regulation (EU) 2021/695 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 April 2021 establishing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, laying down its rules for participation and dissemination, and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1290/2013 and (EU) No 1291/2013 (Text with EEA relevance)Text with EEA relevance. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/695
  18. Davydiuk, O., Ivanova, H., Sivash, O., Lisohorova, K., Sharenko, M., Klierini, H. (2024). Directions for improving the concept of technology for the purpose of financial support for their transfer within the European Union. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (13 (127)), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.299032
  19. Davydiuk, O., Duiunova, T., Shovkoplias, H., Sivash, O., Hlushchenko, S., Lisohorova, K., Maryniv, I. (2023). Directions for improving the international legal regulation of the support program for the transfer of innovations and technologies "Horizon Europe". Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (13 (122)), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.276747
  20. Intramural R&D expenditure (GERD) by source of funds. Source of data: Eurostat; Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). https://doi.org/10.2908/tsc00031
Defining directions for improving regulation of private law forms of technology transfer in the European Union

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Davydiuk, O., Hnatkivskyi, B., Usatyi, V., Borysov, I., & Stetsenko, N. (2024). Defining directions for improving regulation of private law forms of technology transfer in the European Union. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(13 (129), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.305366

Issue

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology