Identifying the influence of project delivery system (PDS) characteristics on green construction project performance

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.318451

Keywords:

Project Delivery System features, green construction, project performance, Sustainable development

Abstract

This study examines the influence of Project Delivery System (PDS) features on green construction project performance by comparing Design-Bid-Build (DBB), Design-Build (DB), and Construction Management (CM) methods. The research problem is to analyze the influence of key characteristics (leadership, communication, mindset, teamwork, team chemistry, experience, competence) of the three PDS methods on achieving green construction project performance. The research objects were 109 respondents (team leader, vice president manager, project manager, site manager, site engineer, general superintendent, and supervisor) in five major cities in Indonesia. The results of the MANOVA analysis showed that leadership was the most influential factor in the three methods. CM excels in time, quality, and green building performance, DB excels in Occupational Health and Safety (OHS), and DBB excels in cost. Experience and competence are less influential factors, thus concluding that soft skills play a significant role in the successful implementation of green construction projects, providing valuable insights for industry practitioners and emphasizing the need to prioritize the development of leadership and interpersonal skills alongside technical expertise when implementing green construction projects through various PDS methods in Indonesia, which ultimately contributes to the advancement of sustainable construction practices in the rapidly growing building sector in the region. These findings provide insights for selecting optimal PDS methods in green construction projects

Author Biographies

I G A Istri Mas Pertiwi, Brawijaya University

Doctoral Program of Civil Engineering

Department of Civil Engineering

Yulvi Zaika, Brawijaya University

Professor Civil Engineering Doctoral Program

Department of Civil Engineering

Kartika Puspa Negara, Brawijaya University

Associate Professor Civil Engineering Doctoral Program

Department of Civil Engineering

Solimun Solimun, Brawijaya University

Professor Statistics Doctoral Program

Department of Statistics

Mochamad Agung Wibowo, Universitas Diponegoro

Professor Civil Engineering Doctoral Program

Department of Civil Engineering

References

  1. Hidayah, S., Husin, A. E. (2022). Faktor-Faktor yang Paling Berpengaruh pada Pekerjaan Retrofitting Rumah Sakit Berbasis Peraturan yang Berlaku di Indonesia. Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik Sipil, 20 (3), 323. https://doi.org/10.12962/j2579-891x.v20i3.13258
  2. Tanjung, N., Susilawati, S. (2024). Pentingnya Penggunaan Alat Pelindung Diri (APD) pada Pekerja Bangunan terhadap Keselamatan Kerja. Corona: Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Umum, Psikolog, Keperawatan Dan Kebidanan, 2 (2), 86–96. https://doi.org/10.61132/corona.v2i2.403
  3. Wiyono, E. S., Dusia, E. L., Alifen, R. S., Rahardjo, J. (2014). Pengaruh parameter bangunan hijau GBCI terhadap fase proyek. Dimensi Utama Teknik Sipil, 1 (1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.9744/duts.1.1.8-13
  4. Ervianto, W. I. (2015). Implementasi Green Construction Sebagai Upaya Mencapai Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di Indonesia. Makal Konf Nas Forum Wahana Tek ke-2. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/17235218/Implementasi_Green_Construction_Sebagai_Upaya_Mencapai_Pembangunan_Berkelanjutan_di_Indonesia
  5. Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery. Jhon Wiley & Sons. Available at: https://books.google.co.id/books?id=2xgWCgAAQBAJ&printsec=copyright&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false
  6. Choosing a Project Delivery Method (2015). DBIA. Available at: https://www.dbiamidamerica.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Primers-Choosing-Delivery-Method.pdf
  7. Demaid, A., Quintas, P. (2006). Knowledge across cultures in the construction industry: sustainability, innovation and design. Technovation, 26 (5-6), 603–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.003
  8. Gluch, P., Gustafsson, M., Thuvander, L. (2009). An absorptive capacity model for green innovation and performance in the construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 27 (5), 451–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190902896645
  9. Robichaud, L. B., Anantatmula, V. S. (2011). Greening Project Management Practices for Sustainable Construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 27 (1), 48–57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)me.1943-5479.0000030
  10. The Best Practices in Facility Management (2012). CMAA. Available at: https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/cmaapdf/255242504
  11. Raouf, A. M., Al-Ghamdi, S. G. (2019). Effectiveness of Project Delivery Systems in Executing Green Buildings. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145 (10). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001688
  12. Zhu, J.-W., Zhou, L.-N., Li, L., Ali, W. (2020). Decision Simulation of Construction Project Delivery System under the Sustainable Construction Project Management. Sustainability, 12 (6), 2202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062202
  13. Gajurel, A. (2013). Project Delivery Systems (PDS). Performance-Based Contracts for Road Projects, 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1302-4_2
  14. Bilec, M. M., Ries, R. J. (2008). Investigation of the Relationship between Green Design and Project Delivery Methods. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI). https://doi.org/10.2172/937581
  15. Hussain, D. (2011). Spirituality, religion, and health: Reflections and issues. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v7i1.111
  16. Shafique, F., Mollaoglu, S. (2020). Transformational Leadership and Team Performance in Green Construction Project Teams: Development of Study Model and Measurement Tool. Construction Research Congress 2020, 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482889.013
  17. Yang, Y. H. (2014). Green Building Implementation through Integrated Project Delivery System. Advanced Materials Research, 1065-1069, 2177–2181. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.1065-1069.2177
  18. Gultekin, P., Mollaoglu-Korkmaz, S., Riley, D. R., Leicht, R. M. (2013). Process Indicators to Track Effectiveness of High-Performance Green Building Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139 (12). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000771
  19. Analisis Kendala Dalam Penerapan Green Construction dan Strategi Untuk Mengatasinya (2015). Universitas Udayana. Available at: https://repositori.unud.ac.id/protected/storage/upload/repositori/beaa29c3a5e78c12316e3aec43669e38.pdf
  20. Azman, M. H. N., Mohamed, A., Odzaly, E. E. (2020). A Theoretical Study on Project Delivery and Leadership Style. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Networking, Information Systems & Security, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3386723.3387842
  21. Onubi, H. O., Yusof, N., Hassan, A. S. (2021). Green construction practices: ensuring client satisfaction through health and safety performance. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29 (4), 5431–5444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15705-5
  22. Thamhain, H. J. (2004). Team Leadership Effectiveness in Technology-Based Project Environments. Project Management Journal, 35 (4), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/875697280403500405
  23. Liew Abdullah, N. H., Ahmad, S. A. (2023). Gaya Kepimpinan di Institusi Pendidikan Teknikal dan Vokasional Abad Ke-21: Ke Arah Kelestarian Pendidikan. Journal of TVET And Technology Review, 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.30880/jttr.2023.01.01.003
  24. Olaniran, H. F. (2018). A Review of Channels of Communication System on Project Delivery. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 7 (6). https://doi.org/10.24940/ijird/2018/v7/i6/jun18003
  25. Geng, Y., Ji, W., Wang, Z., Lin, B., Zhu, Y. (2019). A review of operating performance in green buildings: Energy use, indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction. Energy and Buildings, 183, 500–514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.11.017
  26. Lee, S. K., Ghosh, S. (2020). Communication networks of an integrated project delivery team for construction: relationships between formal and informal communication networks. Connections, 40 (1), 103–122. Available at: https://sciendo.com/article/10.21307/connections-2019.016
  27. Radulescu, C., Mircea, C., Toader, D., Toader, R., Pop, D. (2023). The Impact of Leadership Networking on the Implementation of Projects within Multinational Organizations. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 12, 53–70. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2023.60371
  28. Moradi, S., Kähkönen, K., Sormunen, P. (2022). Analytical and Conceptual Perspectives toward Behavioral Elements of Collaborative Delivery Models in Construction Projects. Buildings, 12 (3), 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030316
  29. Baiden, B. K., Price, A. D. F. (2011). The effect of integration on project delivery team effectiveness. International Journal of Project Management, 29 (2), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.01.016
  30. Franz, B. W., Leicht, R. M. (2016). An alternative classification of project delivery methods used in the United States building construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 34 (3), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2016.1183800
  31. Larsson, J., Larsson, L. (2020). Integration, Application and Importance of Collaboration in Sustainable Project Management. Sustainability, 12 (2), 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020585
  32. Mahame, C., Bigirimana, T., Kundwa, M. J. (2018). The role of effective collaboration for successful delivery of construction projects. Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction, 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.res.2018.133
  33. Bygballe, L. E., Swärd, A. R., Vaagaasar, A. L. (2016). Coordinating in construction projects and the emergence of synchronized readiness. International Journal of Project Management, 34 (8), 1479–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.006
  34. Bresnen, M., Marshall, N. (2002). The engineering or evolution of co-operation? A tale of two partnering projects. International Journal of Project Management, 20 (7), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-7863(01)00043-6
  35. Lahdenperä, P. (2012). Making sense of the multi-party contractual arrangements of project partnering, project alliancing and integrated project delivery. Construction Management and Economics, 30 (1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2011.648947
  36. Ang, N., Cheng, M. M. (2016). Does Self-Certification Encourage or Reduce Opportunistic Behavior? Behavioral Research in Accounting, 28 (2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria-51468
  37. Sugiyono (2020). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta, 630.
  38. Minchin, R. E., Li, X., Issa, R. R., Vargas, G. G. (2013). Comparison of Cost and Time Performance of Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build Delivery Systems in Florida. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139 (10). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000746
  39. Carpenter, N., Bausman, D. C. (2016). Project Delivery Method Performance for Public School Construction: Design-Bid-Build versus CM at Risk. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142 (10). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001155
  40. Bilbo, D., Bigelow, B., Escamilla, E., Lockwood, C. (2014). Comparison of Construction Manager at Risk and Integrated Project Delivery Performance on Healthcare Projects: A Comparative Case Study. International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 11 (1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2013.872734
  41. Shrestha, P. P., Fernane, J. D. (2017). Performance of Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build Projects for Public Universities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143 (3). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001241
  42. Ahmed, M. A., Naqi, S. M. A., Cheema, S. M. (2023). Leadership Styles and Their Influence on Project Team Performance. SJESR, 6 (2), 153–159. https://doi.org/10.36902/sjesr-vol6-iss2-2023(153-159)
  43. Yap, J. B. H., Leong, W. J., Skitmore, M. (2020). Capitalising teamwork for enhancing project delivery and management in construction: empirical study in Malaysia. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27 (7), 1479–1503. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-10-2019-0581
Identifying the influence of project delivery system (PDS) characteristics on green construction project performance

Downloads

Published

2024-12-24

How to Cite

Mas Pertiwi, I. G. A. I., Zaika, Y., Puspa Negara, K., Solimun, S., & Agung Wibowo, M. (2024). Identifying the influence of project delivery system (PDS) characteristics on green construction project performance. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(3 (132), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.318451

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (132) (2024): Control processes

Section

Control processes

License

Copyright (c) 2024 I G A Istri Mas Pertiwi, Yulvi Zaika, Kartika Puspa Negara, Solimun Solimun, Mochamad Agung Wibowo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.