Determining an approach to iris recognition depending on shooting conditions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.325517

Keywords:

iris recognition, Hamming Distance, HMI systems, DenseNet, CLAHE, Equalization Histogram

Abstract

The object of this study is the development and evaluation of image processing and analysis methods for iris recognition, which can be integrated into human-machine interaction (HMI) systems based on biometric data or other contactless interaction approaches.

Enabling high accuracy and reliability of biometric iris recognition systems under variable imaging conditions remains an open scientific challenge. One of the primary difficulties is the impact of changing lighting conditions, head tilt, and partial eye openness on identification results.

This study assesses the effect of preprocessing methods (Equalization Histogram, CLAHE) on iris image quality and compares the algorithmic method (Hamming Distance) with neural network models (CNN, DenseNet) based on key metrics, including accuracy, False Match Rate, False Non-Match Rate, and Equal Error Rate. Additionally, the influence of training dataset structure and neural network hyperparameters on classification performance was analyzed.

The results demonstrate that the Hamming Distance method (HD = 0.35) achieves 95.5 % accuracy, making it a competitive alternative to neural networks. It was established that combining CLAHE and Equalization Histogram effectively reduces noise and enhances segmentation accuracy. Furthermore, it was determined that the DenseNet-201 neural network achieves an accuracy of 99.93 % when using an optimal dataset split (70 %:15 %:15 %). The study confirms that preprocessing techniques such as normalization and adaptive contrast enhancement significantly reduce recognition errors under varying lighting conditions.

The proposed solution holds significant potential for assistive technologies for individuals with visual impairments, the automotive industry, as well as security systems

Author Biographies

Olesia Barkovska, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Electronic Computers

Igor Ruban, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

Doctor of Technical Sciences, First Vice-Rector

Yuri Romanenkov, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Vice-Rector for Scientific Work

Pavlo Botnar, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD Student

Department of Electronic Computers

Anton Havrashenko, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD Student

Department of Electronic Computers

References

  1. Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., Panopoulos, N. (2023). The Future of the Human-Machine Interface (HMI) in Society 5.0. Future Internet, 15 (5), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15050162
  2. Zhou, H., Wang, D., Yu, Y., Zhang, Z. (2023). Research Progress of Human-Computer Interaction Technology Based on Gesture Recognition. Electronics, 12 (13), 2805. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132805
  3. Ban, S., Lee, Y. J., Yu, K. J., Chang, J. W., Kim, J.-H., Yeo, W.-H. (2023). Persistent Human-Machine Interfaces for Robotic Arm Control Via Gaze and Eye Direction Tracking. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 5 (7). https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202200408
  4. Desmarais, Y., Mottet, D., Slangen, P., Montesinos, P. (2021). A review of 3D human pose estimation algorithms for markerless motion capture. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 212, 103275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2021.103275
  5. Malgheet, J. R., Manshor, N. B., Affendey, L. S. (2021). Iris Recognition Development Techniques: A Comprehensive Review. Complexity, 2021 (1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6641247
  6. Barkovska, O., Liapin, Y., Muzyka, T., Ryndyk, I., Botnar, P. (2024). Gaze direction monitoring model in computer system for academic performance assessment. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 99 (1), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v99i1.5503
  7. Barkovska, O., Axak, N., Rosinskiy, D., Liashenko, S. (2018). Application of mydriasis identification methods in parental control systems. 2018 IEEE 9th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT), 459–463. https://doi.org/10.1109/dessert.2018.8409177
  8. Perea-García, J. O., Danel, D. P., Monteiro, A. (2021). Diversity in Primate External Eye Morphology: Previously Undescribed Traits and Their Potential Adaptive Value. Symmetry, 13 (7), 1270. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13071270
  9. Sunilkumar, M., Rudresh, D. R., Prakash, H., Santosh, P., Jambukesh, H. J., Harakannanavar, S. S. (2023). Development of iris recognition model using transform domain approaches with Hamming distance classifier. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management, 5 (5), 459–469. Available at: https://ijaem.net/issue_dcp/Development%20of%20iris%20recognition%20model%20using%20transform%20domain%20approaches%20with%20Hamming%20distance%20classifier.pdf
  10. Xiong, Q., Zhang, X., He, S., Shen, J. (2022). Data Augmentation for Small Sample Iris Image Based on a Modified Sparrow Search Algorithm. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44196-022-00173-7
  11. Hapsari, R. K., Utoyo, M. I., Rulaningtyas, R., Suprajitno, H. (2020). Comparison of Histogram Based Image Enhancement Methods on Iris Images. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1569 (2), 022002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1569/2/022002
  12. Hassan, R., Kasim, S., Wan Chek Jafery, W. A. Z., Ali Shah, Z. (2017). Image Enhancement Technique at Different Distance for Iris Recognition. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7 (4-2), 1510. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.4-2.3392
  13. Kintonova, A., Povkhan, I., Mussaif, M., Gabdreshov, G. (2022). Improvement of iris recognition technology for biometric identification of a person. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (2 (120)), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.269948
  14. Venkatesh, P., Shyam, G. K., Alam, S. (2024). Enhancement of detection accuracy for preventing iris presentation attack. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 14 (4), 4376. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v14i4.pp4376-4385
  15. Nguyen, K., Proença, H., Alonso-Fernandez, F. (2024). Deep Learning for Iris Recognition: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 56 (9), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3651306
  16. Damayanti, F. A., Andri Asmara, R., Prasetyo, G. B. (2024). Residual Network Deep Learning Model with Data Augmentation Effects in the Implementation of Iris Recognition. International Journal of Frontier Technology and Engineering, 2 (2), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.33795/ijfte.v2i2.6223
Determining an approach to iris recognition depending on shooting conditions

Downloads

Published

2025-04-22

How to Cite

Barkovska, O., Ruban, I., Romanenkov, Y., Botnar, P., & Havrashenko, A. (2025). Determining an approach to iris recognition depending on shooting conditions. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(2 (134), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.325517