Forecasting anomalies in network traffic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.326779

Keywords:

Network anomaly, telecommunication traffic, network traffic prediction, long short-term memory (LSTM), semi-supervised learning

Abstract

The increasing volume of traffic, growing number of connections in telecommunication networks, and rising number of mobile devices place significant demands on network providers. These challenges can lead to congestion, latency issues, and security vulnerabilities. However, they can be mitigated or even prevented by identifying network failures in advance. Anomaly detection plays a crucial role in proactively addressing these issues, enabling network operators to optimize network performance, enhance security, and improve the overall user experience.

In this paper, a method for predicting anomalies based on machine learning has been implemented. The LSTM-SMOTE model, which was trained and tested on the KDD-NLS dataset, was considered and the results of the forecasting model were analyzed. Developing the multi-classification model proved to be a challenging task, primarily due to the limited number of attack types. SMOTE is designed to address such difficulties. Imbalanced datasets present a major challenge in predictive modeling, especially when solving classification problems. The four main types of attacks include Denial of service (DoS) attacks, Probe attacks, Privilege attacks, and Access attacks. In this work, three neural network models were developed, including: binary classification, four-class classification, multi-class classification. It is observed that the prediction model retrained again showed the best results, then the model trained with new anomalous data. The LSTM-SMOTE multiclass model achieved the highest performance, with its predictive accuracy rising from 75 % to 99 % across iterations, underscoring its strong dependence on the quality and quantity of data. Practical application of the results obtained can be applied for optimizing network performance

Author Biographies

Inkar Zhumay, Non-Profit Joint Stock Company "Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications named after Gumarbek Daukeyev"

Doctoral Student

Department of Telecommunication Engineering

Kymyssay Tumanbayeva, Non-Profit Joint Stock Company "Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications named after Gumarbek Daukeyev"

Candidate of Engineering Sciences

Department of Telecommunication Engineering

Katipa Chezhimbayeva, Non-Profit Joint Stock Company "Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications named after Gumarbek Daukeyev"

Candidate of Engineering Sciences

Department of Telecommunication Engineering

Kuat Kalibek, Non-Profit Joint Stock Company "Almaty University of Power Engineering and Telecommunications named after Gumarbek Daukeyev"

Master of Science in Engineering

Department of Telecommunication Engineering

References

  1. Cheng, Y., Liu, Q., Wang, J., Wan, S., Umer, T. (2018). Distributed Fault Detection for Wireless Sensor Networks Based on Support Vector Regression. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2018 (1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4349795
  2. Muriira, L. M., Zhao, Z., Min, G. (2018). Exploiting Linear Support Vector Machine for Correlation-Based High Dimensional Data Classification in Wireless Sensor Networks. Sensors, 18 (9), 2840. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092840
  3. Latif, Z., Umer, Q., Lee, C., Sharif, K., Li, F., Biswas, S. (2022). A Machine Learning-Based Anomaly Prediction Service for Software-Defined Networks. Sensors, 22 (21), 8434. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218434
  4. Song, W., Beshley, M., Przystupa, K., Beshley, H., Kochan, O., Pryslupskyi, A. et al. (2020). A Software Deep Packet Inspection System for Network Traffic Analysis and Anomaly Detection. Sensors, 20 (6), 1637. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20061637
  5. Oliveira, T. P., Barbar, J. S., Soares, A. S. (2016). Computer network traffic prediction: a comparison between traditional and deep learning neural networks. International Journal of Big Data Intelligence, 3 (1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbdi.2016.073903
  6. Alkasassbeh, M. (2018). A Novel Hybrid Method for Network Anomaly Detection Based on Traffic Prediction and Change Point Detection. Journal of Computer Science, 14 (2), 153–162. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2018.153.162
  7. Khan, I. A., Pi, D., Khan, Z. U., Hussain, Y., Nawaz, A. (2019). HML-IDS: A Hybrid-Multilevel Anomaly Prediction Approach for Intrusion Detection in SCADA Systems. IEEE Access, 7, 89507–89521. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2925838
  8. Bhatia, R., Benno, S., Esteban, J., Lakshman, T. V., Grogan, J. (2019). Unsupervised machine learning for network-centric anomaly detection in IoT. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM CoNEXT Workshop on Big DAta, Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence for Data Communication Networks, 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359992.3366641
  9. Nurzhaubayeva, G., Haris, N., Chezhimbayeva, K. (2024). Design of the Wearable Microstrip Yagi-Uda Antenna for IoT Applications. International Journal on Communications Antenna and Propagation (IRECAP), 14 (1), 24. https://doi.org/10.15866/irecap.v14i1.24315
  10. Chezhimbayeva, K., Konyrova, M., Kumyzbayeva, S., Kadylbekkyzy, E. (2021). Quality assessment of the contact center while implementation the IP IVR system by using teletraffic theory. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (3 (114)), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.244976
  11. Mukhamejanova, A. D., Grabs, E. A., Tumanbayeva, K. K., Lechshinskaya, E. M. (2022). Traffic simulation in the LoRaWAN network. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics, 11 (2), 1117–1125. https://doi.org/10.11591/eei.v11i2.3484
Forecasting anomalies in network traffic

Downloads

Published

2025-04-22

How to Cite

Zhumay, I., Tumanbayeva, K., Chezhimbayeva, K., & Kalibek, K. (2025). Forecasting anomalies in network traffic. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(2 (134), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.326779