Development of sago starch-alginate hydrogels for extrusion-based 3D food printing

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.336896

Keywords:

3D food printing, shear-thinning, storage modulus, native starch-alginate, sago starch

Abstract

The integration of food-grade starch into 3D printing technologies holds significant potential for creating customized, sustainable, and nutritionally enriched food products. This manuscript explores the development of novel sago starch-alginate food inks, specifically examining their rheological behavior, printability, and application potential for extrusion-based 3D food printing. Indonesia, holding over half the world's sago forests (1.28 million hectares), underutilizes this native staple. However, challenges persist in ensuring structural stability, reproducibility, and functional performance. The primary problem addressed is the identification of suitable hydrogel formulations that achieve both reliable printability and structural integrity post-printing. This study establishes that successful 3D printing of alginate-sago hydrogels requires a critical concentration threshold of 20% alginate/sago formulation. A notable feature is the significant discrepancy between theoretical rheological predictions and experimental outcomes for mid-range composites (e. g., Alg6/Sago6 and Alg8/Sago8), underscoring limitations in current rheological models. Sago starch, with its high amylose content and favorable shear-thinning behavior, offers superior printability and storage performance. While sago incorporation significantly enhances shear-thinning behavior and allows for effective viscosity modulation, storage modulus proved more predictive of printability than viscosity parameters. These findings provide practical insights for optimizing starch in maintaining structural fidelity. A circular and cubical shape of printing with height of 10 cm was reached using the line deposition of around 0.5 mm with 90% accuracy of design pattern

Author Biographies

Doohan Taqdissillah, University of Indonesia

Master of Mechanical Engineering, Student

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Muhammad Irsyad, University of Indonesia

Master of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Yudan Whulanza, University of Indonesia

Doctor of Mechanical Engineering, Professor

Department of Mechanical Engineering

References

  1. Whulanza, Y., Arsyan, R., Saragih, A. S. (2018). Characterization of hydrogel printer for direct cell-laden scaffolds. AIP Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5023972
  2. Sun, J., Zhou, W., Yan, L., Huang, D., Lin, L. (2018). Extrusion-based food printing for digitalized food design and nutrition control. Journal of Food Engineering, 220, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.02.028
  3. Shen, D., Zhang, M., Mujumdar, A. S., Li, J. (2023). Advances and application of efficient physical fields in extrusion based 3D food printing technology. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 131, 104–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2022.11.017
  4. Habibi, H., Khosravi-Darani, K. (2017). Effective variables on production and structure of xanthan gum and its food applications: A review. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 10, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2017.02.013
  5. Udo, T., Mummaleti, G., Mohan, A., Singh, R. K., Kong, F. (2023). Current and emerging applications of carrageenan in the food industry. Food Research International, 173, 113369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113369
  6. Tahir, H. E., Xiaobo, Z., Mahunu, G. K., Arslan, M., Abdalhai, M., Zhihua, L. (2019). Recent developments in gum edible coating applications for fruits and vegetables preservation: A review. Carbohydrate Polymers, 224, 115141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115141
  7. Mudgil, D., Barak, S., Khatkar, B. S. (2011). Guar gum: processing, properties and food applications – A Review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 51 (3), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0522-x
  8. Yang, D., Yuan, Y., Wang, L., Wang, X., Mu, R., Pang, J. et al. (2017). A Review on Konjac Glucomannan Gels: Microstructure and Application. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18 (11), 2250. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18112250
  9. Cui, Y., Li, C., Guo, Y., Liu, X., Zhu, F., Liu, Z. et al. (2022). Rheological & 3D printing properties of potato starch composite gels. Journal of Food Engineering, 313, 110756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2021.110756
  10. Ehara, H., Toyoda, Y., Johnson, D. V. (Eds.) (2018). Sago Palm. Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5269-9
  11. Sumardiono, S., Rakhmawati, R. B. (2017). Physicochemical Properties of Sago Starch Under Various Modification Process: An Overview. Advanced Science Letters, 23 (6), 5789–5791. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.8833
  12. Whulanza, Y., Azadi, A., Supriadi, S., Rahman, S. F., Chalid, M., Irsyad, M. et al. (2022). Tailoring mechanical properties and degradation rate of maxillofacial implant based on sago starch/polylactid acid blend. Heliyon, 8 (1), e08600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08600
  13. Yoon, Y., Kim, C. H., Lee, J. E., Yoon, J., Lee, N. K., Kim, T. H., Park, S.-H. (2019). 3D bioprinted complex constructs reinforced by hybrid multilayers of electrospun nanofiber sheets. Biofabrication, 11 (2), 025015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab08c2
  14. Hirao, K., Kondo, T., Kainuma, K., Takahashi, S. (2021). Starch gel foods in cookery science: application of native starch and modified starches. Journal of Biorheology, 35 (1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.17106/jbr.35.29
  15. Li, C. (2024). Unraveling the Complexities of Starch Retrogradation: Insights from Kinetics, Molecular Interactions, and Influences of Food Ingredients. Food Reviews International, 40 (9), 3159–3182. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2024.2347467
  16. Wang, S., Li, C., Copeland, L., Niu, Q., Wang, S. (2015). Starch Retrogradation: A Comprehensive Review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 14 (5), 568–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12143
  17. Feltre, G., Almeida, F. S., Sato, A. C. K., Dacanal, G. C., Hubinger, M. D. (2020). Alginate and corn starch mixed gels: Effect of gelatinization and amylose content on the properties and in vitro digestibility. Food Research International, 132, 109069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109069
  18. Ramírez, C., Millon, C., Nuñez, H., Pinto, M., Valencia, P., Acevedo, C., Simpson, R. (2015). Study of effect of sodium alginate on potato starch digestibility during in vitro digestion. Food Hydrocolloids, 44, 328–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.08.023
  19. Zhong, Q., Chen, Y., Zhang, X., Yang, G., Jin, W., Peng, D., Huang, Q. (2024). Correlation between 3D printability and rheological properties of biopolymer fluid: A case study of alginate-based hydrogels. Journal of Food Engineering, 370, 111970. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2024.111970
  20. Ji, H., Zhao, J., Chen, J., Shimai, S., Zhang, J., Liu, Y. et al. (2022). A novel experimental approach to quantitatively evaluate the printability of inks in 3D printing using two criteria. Additive Manufacturing, 55, 102846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2022.102846
  21. Cui, Y., Yang, F., Wang, C., Blennow, A., Li, C., Liu, X. (2024). 3D Printing windows and rheological properties for normal maize starch/sodium alginate composite gels. Food Hydrocolloids, 146, 109178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109178
  22. Yang, F., Zhang, M., Bhandari, B. (2015). Recent development in 3D food printing. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57 (14), 3145–3153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2015.1094732
  23. Whulanza, Y., Hidayaturrahmi, P., Kurniawati, T., AJ, R. (2017). Realization and testing of multi-material 3D printer for bone scaffold fabrication. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1817, 040001. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4976786
  24. Fonkwe, L. G., Narsimhan, G., Cha, A. S. (2003). Characterization of gelation time and texture of gelatin and gelatin–polysaccharide mixed gels. Food Hydrocolloids, 17 (6), 871–883. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-005x(03)00108-5
  25. Yan, N., Yang, L., Xiao, X., Huang, P., Shu, C., Song, S., Tan, H. (2025). Research on Structural–Mechanical Property of Rice Starch Gels for Food 3D Printing and Flexible Sensing. Journal of Food Process Engineering, 48 (5). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.70126
  26. Okazaki, M. (2018). The Structure and Characteristics of Sago Starch. Sago Palm, 247–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5269-9_18
  27. Du, C., Jiang, F., Jiang, W., Ge, W., Du, S. (2020). Physicochemical and structural properties of sago starch. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 164, 1785–1793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.310
  28. Nishiyama, S., Okazaki, M., Katsumi, N., Honda, Y., Tsujimoto, M. (2015). Surface charge on sago starch granules. Sago Palm, 23 (2), 77–83. Available at: https://www.sagopalmsociety.com/_files/ugd/3f58e5_4142a53f161840f68dc865bd28bed78f.pdf
  29. Singh, J., Singh, N. (2003). Studies on the morphological and rheological properties of granular cold water soluble corn and potato starches. Food Hydrocolloids, 17 (1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-005x(02)00036-x
  30. Pérez, E. E., Breene, W. M., Bahnassey, Y. A. (1998). ariations in the Gelatinization Profiles of Cassava, Sagu and Arrowroot Native Starches as Measured with Different Thermal and Mechanical Methods. Starch - Stärke, 50 (2-3), 70–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1521-379x(199803)50:2/3<70::aid-star70>3.0.co;2-u
  31. Ronda, F., Roos, Y. H. (2008). Gelatinization and freeze-concentration effects on recrystallization in corn and potato starch gels. Carbohydrate Research, 343 (5), 903–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2008.01.026
Development of sago starch-alginate hydrogels for extrusion-based 3D food printing

Downloads

Published

2025-08-26

How to Cite

Taqdissillah, D., Irsyad, M., & Whulanza, Y. (2025). Development of sago starch-alginate hydrogels for extrusion-based 3D food printing. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(11 (136), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.336896

Issue

Section

Technology and Equipment of Food Production