Development of a method for assessing the society national security level based on the triple helix concept

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.337398

Keywords:

triple helix, clusters, national security system, integral assessment indicator

Abstract

The object of research is the process of formation of a network structure and a new, non-hierarchical method of coordinating the links of assessing the society national security level, based on the triple helix concept. The triple helix (network interaction of science, business and the state) is presented as a universal institutional matrix for an innovative type of growth and conditions for continuous updates of the relationships of the political, social and economic part of the society national security level. From these positions, the concept of the triple helix allows to form the principles of managing the society national security level under the conditions of interaction of its parts. In this case, the main indicators of national security are taken into account. The economic and social situation at the local level directly affects the stability, manageability, civic cohesion and the country’s ability to resist external and internal threats. The proposed models provide the formation of the national security level integrated indicator model through the main factors of the political, social and economic components. The conducted studies provide a more objective assessment of "preventive" security measures in the context of providing data from state bodies and operational information from law enforcement agencies. At the same time, both quantitative and qualitative assessments of the national security level are taken into account, which provides confidence in ensuring the national security level of the state as a whole. The proposed method for assessing the national security level is based on a model for calculating the integral indicator of the regional society national security level, which ensures timely intervention by authorities and state institutions in stabilizing and/or increasing the national security level. Thus, at the beginning of 2022 in Lviv (Ukraine) it was 65.75 (stable region), in Mariupol (Ukraine) – 32.75 (before occupation, risk to security)

Author Biographies

Serhii Yevseiev, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Cybersecurity

Stanislav Milevskyi, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Cybersecurity

Yevhen Melenti, National Academy of the Security Service of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor

First Vice-Rector

Oleksandr Voitko, National Defence University of Ukraine

Doctor of Military Sciences, Associate Professor

Strategic Communications Institute

Mykhailo Aleksieiev, National Defence University of Ukraine

PhD, Leading Researcher

Bohdan Morklyanyk, Yevhenii Bereznyak Military Academy

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Information Technology

Serhii Povaliaiev, Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Machine Parts and the Theory of Mechanisms and Machines

Rositsa Shvorak, National Technical University “Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute”

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Software Engineering and Management Intelligent Technologies

Yelyzaveta Sevriukova, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

PhD Student

Department of Enterprise Economics and Business Organization

Dmytro Rykov, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD Student

Department of Information Technology Security

References

  1. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The Triple Helix---University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory For Knowledge Based Economic Development. EASST Review, 14 (1). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241858820_The_Triple_Helix_-_-University-Industry-Government_Relations_A_Laboratory_for_Knowledge_Based_Economic_Development
  2. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government Innovation in Action. Routledge, 180. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203929605
  3. Hasumi, Y. (2007). Roles of International Organizations and the EU in Governing the Global Economy: Implications for Regional Cooperation in Asia. The Third EU-NESCA Workshop. Korea University.
  4. Lindholm, A. (2010). The EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region. Update from European Commission. State of the Region Report 2010.
  5. Gadetska, S., Dubnitskiy, V., Kushneruk, Y., Ponochovnyi, Y., Khodyrev, A. (2024). Simulation of exchange processes in multi-component environments with account of data uncertainty. Advanced Information Systems, 8 (1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2024.1.02
  6. Hospers, G.-J., Desrochers, P., Sautet, F. (2008). The next Silicon Valley? On the relationship between geographical clustering and public policy. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5 (3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0080-5
  7. Drucker, P. F. (1992). The New Society of Organizations. Harvard Business Review.
  8. Ketels, C. (2009). Clusters, Cluster Policy, and Swedish Competitiveness in the Global Economy. Expert report No. 30 to Sweden's Globalisation Council.
  9. Schebesch, K. B., ȘSoim, H. F., Blaga, R. L. (2024). The triple-helix model as foundation of innovative entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology, 4 (2), 104–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeet-08-2024-0026
  10. Kunwar, R. R., Ulak, N. (2024). Extension of the Triple Helix to Quadruple to Quintuple Helix Model. Journal of APF Command and Staff College, 7 (1), 241–280. https://doi.org/10.3126/japfcsc.v7i1.67006
  11. Lassa, J. (2021). Food Security is a Triple-helix security phenomenon: An observation from COVID-19 in Indonesia. COVID-19 beyond Health Insecurity. Available at: https://conference.ihsa.info/call-for-papers/view/2714/
  12. Yang, Y., Egelund Holgaard, J. (2012). The important role of civil society groups in eco‐innovation: a triple helix perspective. Journal of Knowledge-Based Innovation in China, 4 (2), 132–148. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561411211235730
  13. Giraldo Martinez, G. A., Valencia Pérez, L. R. (2022). The Triple Helix and its Intervention in the Research and Development of Products for International Security and Defense. Revista de Relaciones Internacionales, Estrategia y Seguridad, 17 (1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.18359/ries.5600
  14. Kotnik, Ž., Klun, M. (2025). The Reluctance of the Local Public Administration to Participate in the Triple Helix. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 18 (1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2025-0005
  15. Kośmider, T. (2023). National Security And Social Capacity. International Journal of Legal Studies ( IJOLS ), 15 (3), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.2801
  16. Katz, Y. (2025). The Controversy Over Equitable Burden-Sharing In Israel’s National Defense. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 08 (04). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i4-34
  17. Grubicka, J. G., Nitka, M. (2023). Security versus the inclusive vision of the digital society determinants of selected aspects of cyber security. Zeszyty Naukowe SGSP, 86, 205–219. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.7155
  18. Linton, G. (2024). Triple Helix Dynamics and Hybrid Organizations: An Analysis of Value Creation Processes. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15 (4), 20797–20822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-01911-2
  19. Espuny, M., Reis, J. S. da M., Giupponi, E. C. B., Rocha, A. B. T., Costa, A. C. F., Poltronieri, C. F., Oliveira, O. J. de. (2025). The Role of the Triple Helix Model in Promoting the Circular Economy: Government-Led Integration Strategies and Practical Application. Recycling, 10 (2), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling10020050
  20. Carayannis, E. G., Campbell, D. F. J. (2022). Towards an Emerging Unified Theory of Helix Architectures (EUTOHA): Focus on the Quintuple Innovation Helix Framework as the Integrative Device. Triple Helix, 9 (1), 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1163/21971927-bja10028
  21. Hladchenko, M., Pinheiro, R. (2018). Implementing the Triple Helix Model: Means-Ends Decoupling at the State Level? Minerva, 57 (1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-018-9355-3
  22. Yevseiev, S., Ryabukha, Y., Milov, O., Milevskyi, S., Pohasii, S., Melenti, Y. et al. (2021). Development of a method for assessing forecast of social impact in regional communities. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (2 (114)), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.249313
  23. Khto za koho proholosuvav u druhomu turi vyboriv Prezydenta Ukrainy: demohrafichni rezultaty Natsionalnoho ekzyt-polu2019. Available at: https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-presshall/2689257-hto-za-kogo-progolosuvav-u-drugomu-turi-viboriv-prezidenta-ukraini-demograficni-rezultati-nacionalnogo-ekzitpolu2019.html
Development of a method for assessing the society national security level based on the triple helix concept

Downloads

Published

2025-08-30

How to Cite

Yevseiev, S., Milevskyi, S., Melenti, Y., Voitko, O., Aleksieiev, M., Morklyanyk, B., Povaliaiev, S., Shvorak, R., Sevriukova, Y., & Rykov, D. (2025). Development of a method for assessing the society national security level based on the triple helix concept. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(4 (136), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.337398

Issue

Section

Mathematics and Cybernetics - applied aspects