Static planning models synthesis of quality improvement of software development process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.43003Keywords:
quality, software development process, maturity model, utility functionAbstract
The task of quality improvement planning of the software development process is presented in the form of the problem of rolling scheduling, which involves the formation of static and dynamic models. The synthesis of the static problem, which is multicriteria and based on the formalization of maturity model was considered in the paper. The utility functions of the extent of achieving the target profile and resource provision, necessary to accomplish the goal were used as criteria. Resource provision is determined by two generalized indicators. The first is finance, which are distributed among the individual structural components (practice and focus areas) of the software development process. The second - a resource indicator, is associated with the time the company employees must spend on advancing the software development process to a higher maturity level, that is, the time the employees are distracted from the company's core activities. Three models that are focused on the following tasks: searching for a compromise with respect to various categories of the CMMI (Capability Maturity Model - Integrated) model and two sets of utility functions; defining a compromise with respect to the target integrated utility functions of two groups of criteria; searching for the optimal value of the generalized objective utility function were formed. The models are mathematical programming tasks with integer and Boolean variables.
References
- Persse, J. R. (2006). Process Improvement Essentials. O'Reilly, 352.
- Poulin, L. A. (2005). Reducing risk with software process improvement. Auerbach Publications, 288. doi: 10.1201/9781420031126
- Mutafelija, B. (2009). Process improvement with CMMI v1.2 and ISO standards. Auerbach Publications, 406.
- Martins, P. V., Silva, A. R. (2007). ProPAM: SPI based on Process and Project AlignmentMartins. IRMA Internacional Conference, 124–143.
- Steenbergen, M., Bos, R., Brinkkemper, S., van de Weerd, I., Bekkers, W. (2010). The Design of Focus Area Maturity Models. 5th SIKS/BENAIS Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, 317–332. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_22
- Maier, A. M., Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P. J. (2009). Developing maturity grids for assessing organisational capabilities: Practitioner guidance. 4th International Conference on Management Consulting, Academy of Management (MCD'09), 116–127.
- Godlevskiy, M. D., Shehovcov, V. A., Braginskiy, I. L. (2012). Modeling principles of assessment and control of quality in software development process. Eastern-Eurapean Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5/3 (59), 45–49. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/4512/4195
- Godlevskiy, M. D., Braginskiy, I. L. (2012). Dinamicheskaia model' i algoritm upravleniia kachestvom processa razrabotki programmnykh sistem na osnove modeli zrelosti. Problemy informacionnyh tehnologiy, Kherson: OLDI-Plius, 6–13.
- Godlevskij, M. D., Braginskiy, I. L. (2013). Information technology of quality management of software development process. Eastern-Eurapean Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2/9 (62), 63–67. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/12448/10347
- Chrissis, M. B., Konrad, M., Shrum, S. (2003). CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Addison-Wesley, 688.
- Ahern, D. M., Clouse, A., Turner, R. (2008). CMMI Distilled: A Practical Introduction to Integrated Process Improvement. Addison-Wesley, 288.
- Ovezgel'dyev, A. O., Petrov, Je. G., Petrov, K. Je. (2002). Sintez i identifikaciia modelei mnogofaktornogo ocenivaniia i optimizacii. Kiev: Naukova dumka, 163.
- Sarkisian, S. A., Ahundov, V. M., Minaev, E. S. (1977), Bol'shie tehnicheskie sistemy. Analiz i prognoz razvitiia. Moscow: Nauka, 350.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Анна Александровна Голоскокова, Михаил Дмитриевич Годлевский
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.
