Designing an approach to building the teams of high technological projects performers at virtual instrument-making enterprises

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71493

Keywords:

high technological project, virtual instrument-making enterprise, team of performers of a project, expert evaluation of scenarios

Abstract

The approach to building the teams of the performers of high technological project is described, directed toward a decrease of uncertainty in the process of realization of a future project, connected with the establishment of compliance among the tasks of the project, which have innovation nature, and by the level of competence of potential performers. The key stages of the approach are: forming the base of contenders for participation in the project; assessment of competence of contenders; forming alternatives of the composition of a project’s team; analysis of alternatives with the aid of the scripted methods of collective expert evaluation; selection of a rational variant of the team of the performers of a project. The relevance of the conducted research is determined by the world-wide trend of development of post-industrial society in the direction of the virtualization of production. In the course of the performed study we proved the expediency of development and application, in the process of personnel management at a virtual instrument-making enterprise, of special methods of selection the contenders for the composition of the teams of high technological projects planned for implementation. Based on them, it is possible to design tools of decision making support to both top manager and HR-manager of VIE. The described approach, unlike the known ones, makes it possible to decrease the level of uncertainty (NO-factors) in the aspects of incompleteness, carelessness, inaccuracy. The applied significance of the results of the study can be quantitatively evaluated on the basis of a special method, designed in the course of the study. This method is directed toward the assessment of economic efficiency of the application of this approach to the process of designing high technological projects, which will make it possible to decrease overhead expenses at planning the strategy of VIE.

Author Biographies

Andrii Sobchak, N. E. Zhukovsky National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute" Chkalov str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management

Elena Shostak, N. E. Zhukovsky National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute" Chkalov str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070

Postgraduate student

Department of management

Tamara Tseplyaeva, N. E. Zhukovsky National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute" Chkalov str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070

PhD, professor

Designing the department aircraft and vertoletov,

Olga Popova, LLC Scientific-Production Enterprise "KIATON" Astronomichna str., 17/40, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61085

Commercial Director

Anna Firsova, N. E. Zhukovsky National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute" Chkalov str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61070

Postgraduate student

Department of management

References

  1. Baranov, M. N., Saakova, L. V., Shmatko, A. D. (2011). Razvitie i gosudarstvennaja podderzhka malogo innovacionnogo predprinimatel'stva v nauchno-tehnicheskoj sfere. SPb.: Izd–vo SZTU, 131.
  2. Kyzym, M. O., Matjushenko, I. Ju., Shostak, I. V. (2012). Perspektyvy rozvytku informacijno–komunikacijnyh tehnologij i shtuchnogo intelektu v ekonomikah krai'n svitu ta Ukrai'ny: monografija. Kharkiv: VD «INZhEK», 492.
  3. Martynov, L. M. (2003). Metodologija upravlenija organizacijami v informacionno-kommunikacionnoj srede. SPb.: Izd-vo SPb GUEF, 180.
  4. Zhilina, A. I. (2002). Etalonnaja model' professional'noj kompetentnosti menedzhera (rukovoditelja). SPb.: IOV RAO, 228.
  5. Zavgorodnjaja, A. (2001). Upravlenie znanijami v organizacii. Novye znanija, 1, 28–30.
  6. Zimnjaja, I. A. (2003). Kljuchevye kompetencii – novaja paradigma rezul'tata obrazovanija. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnja, 5, 34–42.
  7. Larichev, O. I., Moshkovich, E. M. (1996). Kachestvennye metody prinjatija reshenij. Verbal'nyj analiz reshenij. Moscow: Nauka. Fizmatlit, 208.
  8. Asai, K., Vatada, D., Ivai, S. et. al. (1993). Prikladnye nechetkie sistemy. Moscow: Mir, 392.
  9. Shafer, G. (1976). A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 297.
  10. Smarandache, F., Dezert, J. (Eds.) (2004). Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion. Collected Works, American Research Press, Rehoboth, 473 p.
  11. Kovalenko, I. I., Shved, A. V. (2012). Nekotorye prikladnye zadachi teorii grubyh mnozhestv. Vestnik HNTU, 1 (44), 7–14.
  12. Shostak, E. I. (2015). Formirovanie komand ispolnitelej vysokotehnologichnyh proektov na innovacionnyh predprijatijah s ispol'zovaniem ekspertnogo ocenivanija scenariev. Vіsnik Nacіonal'nogo tehnіchnogo unіversitetu «HPІ». Serіja: Mehanіko-tehnologіchnі sistemi ta kompleksi, 36 (1145), 57–63.
  13. Byrne, J. A., Brandt, R., Port, O. (2006). The Virtual Corporation: The Company of the Future will be the Ultimate in Adaptability. International Business Week, 8, 36–41.
  14. Kievskoe otdelenie Proect Management Institute. Available at: http://www.pmi.org.ua/
  15. Mejtus, V. (2006). Virtual'nye predprijatija v obshhestve XXI veka. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravlenija, 4,71–81.
  16. Kuratovskij, K., Mostovskij, A. (1970). Teorija mnozhestv. Moscow: «Mir», 416.
  17. Strel'chuk, E. A. (2010). Sravnitel'nyj analiz metodov opredelenija urovnej kompetencij IT specialistov v sistemah ocenki personala. Sistemi upravlіnnja, navіgacіi ta zv’jazku, 1 (13), 171–175.
  18. Slastenin, V. A., Isaev, I. F., Shijanov, E. N. (2002). Pedagogika. Moscow: Izd. centr "Akademija", 576.
  19. Pegat, A. (2009). Nechetkoe modelirovanie i upravlenie. Moscow: BINOM. Laboratorija znanij, 783–798.
  20. Zade, L. (1976). Nechetkaja logika: ponjatie lingvisticheskoj peremennoj i ego prilozhenie k prinjatiju priblizhennyh reshenij. Moscow: Mir, 167.
  21. Orlov, A. I. (2002). Ekspertnye ocenki. Moscow: Ekzamen, 31.
  22. Kovalenko, I. I., Shved, A. V. (2013). Ekspertnye tehnologii podderzhki prinjatija reshenij: monografija. Nikolaev: Ilion, 216.
  23. Kitaev, N. N. (1975). Gruppovye ekspertnye ocenki. Moscow: Znanie, 64.
  24. Saati, T. (1993). Prinjatie reshenij. Metod analiza ierarhij. Moscow: Radio i svjaz', 278.
  25. Dubois, D., Prade, H. (1986). A set-theoretic view of belief functions. Logical operations and approximations by fuzzy sets. International Journal of General Systems, 12 (3), 193–226. doi: 10.1080/03081078608934937
  26. Stanovs'kyj, O. L., Kolesnikova, K. V., Lebedeva, O. Ju., Heblov, I. (2015). Dynamic models in the method of proect management. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (3 (78)), 46–52. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.55665
  27. Kucherenko, E. I., Drjuk, A. D. (2014). Extension of methods of intelligent control of complex objects. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (3 (70)), 13–18. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2014.26123

Downloads

Published

2016-06-23

How to Cite

Sobchak, A., Shostak, E., Tseplyaeva, T., Popova, O., & Firsova, A. (2016). Designing an approach to building the teams of high technological projects performers at virtual instrument-making enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(2(81), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.71493

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 2(81) (2016): Information technology. Industry control systems

Section

Industry control systems

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Андрей Павлович Собчак, Elena Shostak, Tamara Tseplyaeva, Olga Popova, Anna Firsova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.