Lifelong learning” is a new paradigm of personnel training in enterprises

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.74905

Keywords:

learning, paradigm, continuity, project management, communication, Markov chain, knowledge holders, transfer

Abstract

World practice to overcome the lack of knowledge and meet educational needs under the terms of career growth and personal improvement and development is based on the modern paradigm of continuous postgraduate education ‑ lifelong learning (LLL).

In the context of learning management, the analysis of features and synthesis of the structure of interaction of the basic process entities as knowledge holders were performed. Referring basic knowledge holders ‑ team, customer, training and in-depth knowledge systems to certain discrete states, which the system may take, allows representing the system using a Markov chain with four discrete states. A directed graph of the Markov chain reflects the secondary projection of a communication on the knowledge space rather than the physical interaction of the knowledge holders. Markov chain transition probabilities for the project environment define its characteristics that vary in discrete time by the steps in the form of a set of state probabilities. Cognitive properties of the model which is based on the Markov chain makes it possible to set some specific values of the transition probabilities of the system.

The results obtained are the justification for continuing training and acquiring additional education of personnel in the deficit of knowledge that is necessary for the implementation of unique projects. Using the developed cognitive model of the interaction of knowledge in project management, the paradigm of “lifelong learning” was justified. The knowledge management structure includes four fundamental entities: the customer, the team, training and in-depth knowledge systems of the knowledge owners. These entities are in a constant process of knowledge sharing. The systems of training and in-depth knowledge play a role of generating new knowledge, which was absent in the project environment. Continuing education ideally is aimed at balancing between the needs of society and the motivational structure of personality that actually should be implemented through the mechanisms of the influence of education on the socialization of the individual.

Author Biographies

Viktor Gogunskii, Odessa National Polytechnic University Shevchenko ave., 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Systems Management Life Safety

Olexii Kolesnikov, Odessa National Polytechnic University Shevchenko ave., 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Systems Management Life Safety

Kateryna Kolesnikova, Odessa National Polytechnic University Shevchenko ave., 1, Odessa, Ukraine, 65044

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Information technology in mechanical engineering

Dmytro Lukianov, Belarusian State University Nezavisimosti ave., 4, Minsk, Belarus, 220030

PhD

Department of General and Clinical Psychology

Faculty of Social and Cultural Communication

References

  1. ISO/DIS 29990:2010. Learning services for non-formal education and training – Basic requirements for service providers (2010). ISO: ISO/TK 232, 18.
  2. Bosco, J. (2007). Lifelong learning: what? why? How? Western Michigan University, 8. Available at: http://homepages.wmich.edu/~bosco/docs/LifelongLearning-2.pdf
  3. Making a European Area of Lifelong Learning a Reality (2001). Commission of the European Communities. Brussels, 40. Available at: http://aei.pitt.edu/42878/1/com2001_0678.pdf
  4. Bushuyev, S. D., Bushuyev, D. A., Rogozina, V. B., Mikhieieva, O. V. (2015). Convergence of knowledge in project management. Technology and Applications, IDAACS, 496–500.
  5. Ozorhon, B., Karatas, C. G., Demirkesen, S. (2014). A Web-based Database System for Managing Construction Project Knowledge. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 377–386. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.043
  6. Kvasz, L. (2014). Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions between sociology and epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 46, 78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2014.02.006
  7. Stepko, M. F., Klymenko, B. V., Tovazhnyansky, L. L. (2004). Bologna process and lifelong learning. NTU "Kharkov Polytechnic University". Kharkov, 111. Available at: http://library.zntu.edu.ua/Bolon_process/Book.pdf
  8. Sherstyuk, O., Olekh, Т., Kolesnikova, K. (2016). The research on role differentiation as a method of forming the project team. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2/3 (80), 63–68. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.65681
  9. Otradskaya, T., Gogunskii, V. (2016). Development process models for evaluation of performance of the educational establishments. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3/3 (81), 12–22. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.66562
  10. Rivera, A., Kashiwagi, J. (2016). Identifying the State of the Project Management Profession. Procedia Engineering, 145, 1386–1393. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.204
  11. Lizunov, P. P., Beloshchitsky, S. A., Beloshchitskaya, S. V. (2011). Design – vector control by higher education institutions. Management of development of complex systems, 6, 135–139.
  12. Oganov, A. V., Gogunsky, V. D. (2013). Using the theory of constraints in implementing enterprise project management office. GESJ: Computer Sciences and Telecommunications, 4 (40), 59–65.
  13. Kolesnikova, K. V. (2013). Modeling of semistructured project management systems. Odes'kyi Politechnichnyi Universytet. Pratsi, 3 (42), 127–131. doi: 10.15276/opu.3.42.2013.25
  14. Demings System of Profound Knowledge. DEMING.PRO. Available at: http://www.deming.pro/deming_profound_knowledge.html
  15. Project Management Competency Development Framework (PMCDF) (2013). Model development project manager competencies, 91.
  16. Jeffery, K. J. (2015). Distorting the metric fabric of the cognitive map. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19 (6), 300–301. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.04.001
  17. Naimpally, A., Ramachandran, H., Smith, C. (2011). Lifelong Learning for Engineers and Scientists in the Information Age. Elsevier, 102.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-30

How to Cite

Gogunskii, V., Kolesnikov, O., Kolesnikova, K., & Lukianov, D. (2016). Lifelong learning” is a new paradigm of personnel training in enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(2(82), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.74905